I was thinking about the iPhone 16. Can play AAA games with the A18 chip and 8GB RAM. It has wonderful colors. Although its camera is not as good as the pros, it is very advanced. Not everyone may want pro models. Personally, my first choice would be the pros. But in some places these phones are not easy to access and not everyone wants a phone to do professional work.
But it has a 60hz screen. It's not the end of the world and there is an alternative for those who want it, yes! Let's continue with the rest people. If this phone's screen was 120hz or at worst 90hz, it could be one of the best phones on the market in terms of price performance, maybe the best. Let's look at this from both sides.
If this happened, people would be happy; Because those who had old base models would buy the iPhone 16 with enthusiasm. Because there are more serious innovations compared to previous models and they knew that they would have a better screen experience with a better screen refresh rate.
Any Android user looking to buy a new phone would also prioritize the iPhone 16. Because you know that even the cheapest Android phones have 90hz at worst.
On the other hand, only those who will use the iPhone 16 Pro for professional work would buy it. Its luxury product status would continue. But... I don't know. Saving features that are no longer considered pro only to the pro model seems like unconsciousness and market cheating to me. Won't be able to make an extra $200 profit for almost the same thing.
Only Apple can do this.
Apple's iPhone has been just pro model since 2017. I think they should only release one model. Just like before.
I know, some people like the refresh rate that has been used for 17 years and may see the 120hz screen as just a luxury feature; Just like a mobile camera can shoot video.
I just want people in all circumstances to have access to technology that is now a cliché. Especially if he's paying $800. In countries like Türkiye, it is 1900 dollars. But hey, Apple will do this 1 year later. Applause.
But it has a 60hz screen. It's not the end of the world and there is an alternative for those who want it, yes! Let's continue with the rest people. If this phone's screen was 120hz or at worst 90hz, it could be one of the best phones on the market in terms of price performance, maybe the best. Let's look at this from both sides.
If this happened, people would be happy; Because those who had old base models would buy the iPhone 16 with enthusiasm. Because there are more serious innovations compared to previous models and they knew that they would have a better screen experience with a better screen refresh rate.
Any Android user looking to buy a new phone would also prioritize the iPhone 16. Because you know that even the cheapest Android phones have 90hz at worst.
On the other hand, only those who will use the iPhone 16 Pro for professional work would buy it. Its luxury product status would continue. But... I don't know. Saving features that are no longer considered pro only to the pro model seems like unconsciousness and market cheating to me. Won't be able to make an extra $200 profit for almost the same thing.
Only Apple can do this.
Apple's iPhone has been just pro model since 2017. I think they should only release one model. Just like before.
I know, some people like the refresh rate that has been used for 17 years and may see the 120hz screen as just a luxury feature; Just like a mobile camera can shoot video.
I just want people in all circumstances to have access to technology that is now a cliché. Especially if he's paying $800. In countries like Türkiye, it is 1900 dollars. But hey, Apple will do this 1 year later. Applause.
Last edited: