Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I just can't see how you guys are willing to opt for a thinner mbp, if it means losing the ports and getting rid of the hard drive and only having an ssd. Optical fine I can live with that being external, but whats the point of having a laptop if I have to carry around all this crap to use it.
 
I just can't see how you guys are willing to opt for a thinner mbp, if it means losing the ports and getting rid of the hard drive and only having an ssd. Optical fine I can live with that being external, but whats the point of having a laptop if I have to carry around all this crap to use it.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think that "removing the hard drive" is an option on the table at this point. Replacing the HDD with a SSD doesn't save any space really.
 
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think that "removing the hard drive" is an option on the table at this point. Replacing the HDD with a SSD doesn't save any space really.

Yes it does. Have you not seen the SSD's in the Air's?
 
Not sure if this was mentioned earlier...

My old PC laptop had an ethernet port that slid out like a little CD tray. Kind of hard to explain, but it was only about as thick as a couple of credit cards. You'd plug in downward and all the important bits seemed to line up....

that being said - Apple's known to kick the older technologies before anyone else, I wouldn't be surprised if they decide it's time to go exclusively WiFi soon.
 
The Superdrive and the HDD make up a little more than 1/3 of the volume inside the MBP case, not to mention that they are the thickest parts inside the MBP. If Apple gets rid of those they will have much more space to work with.

They could elongate the Motherboard (just like in the air) and distribute the ports equally on both sides. Now the ethernet port is only 0.4" thick. They could put that all the way up towards the screen (oposite magsafe) and have a wedge design with the thickest point being 0.7-0.8 and going all the way down to 0.2-0.3. Slimming down the screen would help a lot. With the elongated motherboard (on the 15" MBP) they will have enough space for a great heatsink with 2 fans (offering enough air to cool down an ivy bridge quadcore and a mid size GPU) and towards the thinner part they could fill it up with a great battery.(~10 hrs).

The 2nd possibility is that they could go with a uniform design (~0.7") just like in the current ones and save ~1lb of weight. Either or the next MBP wont have HDD nor the Superdrive and IT WILL BE THINNER AND LIGHTER.
 
I rather like the MBP form factor as it is right now. Thinner? I don't care, and I dislike the design of the Air.

As others have noted, it'd be difficult to make the MBP much thinner and to retain an actual Ethernet port, which I need. And I refuse to use an adapter - that defeats part of the point of having an all in one laptop. As does removing the optical drive - I use mine quite a bit.
 
that being said - Apple's known to kick the older technologies before anyone else, I wouldn't be surprised if they decide it's time to go exclusively WiFi soon.

That will be a good idea considering how fast and reliable wifi is.

Not.
 
They could always remove that pointless round part at the bottom and make the bottom lid flush with the case. If they wanted to make it even thinner, they could just remove uncommonly used ports and make adapters.


This could work. It still thinner than before, but not as thin as Air. Thus justifying the 2 lines (MBP and Air). If went any thinner, then whats the point of MBP and Air? Just call em all Air and be done with it.

:D
 
As long as I get all the functionality and performance, I welcome a thinner, lighter MBP. However, since it's thermal management is already horrible, I doubt that even Apple can handle thermal problem with thinner design.
If making it thinner requires compromises in spec, it's no longer a mbp.
 
OMG, I used to own that exact DELL laptop. It was so heavy carrying across an airport. It must have been like 7 lbs!!

I'm happy with the MBP as is. The 13" size is perfect for my needs.

7lbs isn't heavy... the 13" MBP weights only 5lbs (I doubt 2lbs is that much of a difference). I have owned 17" laptops before (back in 2003 and around) and they weighed around 11-12 lbs...
 
Is it possible that Apple removes most of the ports, but then offers a docking station/port replicator add-on (at an exorbitant price)?
 
It makes you wonder if they make something like the MacBook Air but include a small rectangular Thunderbolt adapter on the side that includes Ethernet and USB.

I wonder how people would feel about that...

The only reason anyone feels the wedge is a good design is because Apple produced it. That stupid wedge shape would have been shot down if produced by any other manufacturer. We will eventually have components that run cooler, facilitating a thinner design, but I am hoping it doesn't turn into a mess of unreliable dongles just to plug anything in.

Unrelated to thinness but they should definitely get rid of the HDD and use SSD chips on the board like the Air. For both the 13" and 15" Pro. If they did it on mass they could get the Flash cheap enough. You wouldn't get 750GB of storage, I'd say anywhere between 128GB and 512GB depending on the model and how cheap Apple can get the storage. And the loss of storage size is made up ten fold by the advantages of SSD. Not to mention you can plug in a high speed thunderbolt drive (which would be 3.5" and by default way faster than a notebook hard drive).

They'll probably analyze the percentage of users that require higher capacity drives versus what they are willing to pay for them. I imagine we'd need at least something along the lines of cost effective 512GB capacities to make this happen. No one wants to own a laptop and then carry around external drives, adapters, and a bunch of other stuff just so that the base machine can be manufactured in a slightly more compact form. They need better solutions rather than forcing what they consider a small percentage of users to actually increase the amount of extras that need to be carried with the laptop.


Path of the Macbook Pro is no doubt going to be a machine that is a step closer to the present Air. Steve Jobs very much eluded to this, and the Air is the fastest selling Apple Notebook. I am sure we will see a sliming of the system, with a similar wedge design to that of the Air`s

Now couple the same SSD to a Quad Core & discrete GPU and you are going to have a far more versatile system, as long as the storage is priced reasonably. A system attractive to all; professionals, prosumers, educationalists, students and of course the casual user offering Speed & Power :apple:

Apple has been pushing more and more toward integrated gpus as the norm across their laptop line. Next year the quad core won't be able to run in an air like enclosure (at least not one like what is in the pro), as the tdp isn't coming down that much. If they do manage to get one in, you will see many complaints about heat.

There are a lot of comments that are pretty far off in here, like a slimmed down macbook pro retaining firewire. That's probably the first thing I'd expect to see go even given the outrage last time. Thunderbolt should become a replacement for firewire accessories, but it doesn't have the price or adoption yet.

Is it possible that Apple removes most of the ports, but then offers a docking station/port replicator add-on (at an exorbitant price)?

It wouldn't surprise me even a little. Some things about their designs just annoy me so much. They constantly try to hide wires then for the masses, then a smaller percentage of users are stuck with a hideous mess of adapters and dongles with high failure rates and weak connections. It's incredibly frustrating. The failure rate on all of these little dongle adapters is always high so they even require a backup (they're way more prone to failure than the internal components).
 
7lbs isn't heavy... the 13" MBP weights only 5lbs (I doubt 2lbs is that much of a difference). I have owned 17" laptops before (back in 2003 and around) and they weighed around 11-12 lbs...
The Dell Inspiron 7000 weighed 8.9 lbs. The battery alone weighed 1.45 lbs. Basically two of my MBPs.
 
Last edited:
I firmly believe either the Air will get a "Pro" version, or something of that nature because the MacBook Pro in its current state, will only go the way of the dinosaur. Mark my words. The reason I say this is because even with all its power, the current MBP (I own the 2011 that first hit the shelves this year) is heavy to be lugging around.

Yes we have netbooks and smartphones etc, but we are spoiled.... Plain and simple we it ALL and it better be light! Don't believe me? Then where did the netbook (and Air) come from in the first place? Because we wanted lighter. I don't care, I would rather have all the port and power and lug around my MBP, then to have an Air and not have what I need when I need it.

The condom rule applies here fellas: Better to have it, and not need it, then to need it and not have it.
 
Last edited:
7lbs isn't heavy... the 13" MBP weights only 5lbs (I doubt 2lbs is that much of a difference). I have owned 17" laptops before (back in 2003 and around) and they weighed around 11-12 lbs...

yeah it was a long tie ago. My memory is certainly fuzzy! It must have been more than 7 lbs! :D

It was probably closer to 10 lbs. All I know was it was thick, heavy and slow! :D
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.