i don't get the point of needing a hard drive if it streams anyways.
unless you're going on vacation and want to watch a movie or two..in which case you arent going to watch 200 hrs of video, and if you do, you should probably get a life.
i don't get the point of needing a hard drive if it streams anyways.
Things are cached to the HD as it streams. I wouldn't want to be at the mercy of an 802.11g connection. The quality of the experience without the HD would go down quite a bit.
I'd have to disagree here - I sync my music and photos, but I stream TV shows and movies and have no problem with a 802.11g network at home. Takes a couple of seconds to begin playing when selected, but that's it.
TV is its lack of a DVD player. If it had this, it would allow people to use it as an "all in one" media center. Sure there are movies and shows on iTunes, but what if it's a DVD that isn't available via iTunes? Having a built-in DVD player probably wouldn't cost too much more on Apple's part, and it would make the high price a lot more justifiable.What do you think it happening in the seconds before it plays? That's the video getting cached. Without media getting cached somewhere (either a traditional hard drive or ram) it would be a terrible bunch of heartache.
I don't think the AppleTV needs to be the end-all-be-all but I see room for improvement. If people think it is perfect I'm glad for them, I'm sure it makes for a happy purchase. I personally think that there are some basic features that would increase value without adding bloat, and having considered my options I think that I would need that value in order to happily own an AppleTV.
I think I see a Mac Mini in my future. Not perfect either, but it more closely resembles what I'd want. That is to say a larger hard drive and the potential for DVR.
I'd also like to point out that there doesn't have to be just two AppleTV's. We have iMac's and Mac Pro's, why not AppleTV's and AppleTV Pro's then?
That would be cool - but I guess from Apple's point of view it would blur the line with the mac mini too much.- It had a DVD player (hackers get it region free)
It doesn't even need the scart socket - just an option to do RGB on the three video phono sockets, and its trivial to connect that to a scart cable (really cheap adaptor cable). It may even be possible to do this in software - which would make the thing a lot more appealing in the UK and Europe!- No RGB scart output? It's not HD so why not?
I know it's the video being cached, but that doesn't change my point - once that's done which takes 3 seconds tops, then I have no issues whatsoever across my 802.11g network.
I also never said that it is a perfect device and that it couldn't be improved. I was just disagreeing with MikeL who said he wouldn't want to be at the mercy of a 802.11g connection.
My only problem with theTV is its lack of a DVD player. If it had this, it would allow people to use it as an "all in one" media center. Sure there are movies and shows on iTunes, but what if it's a DVD that isn't available via iTunes? Having a built-in DVD player probably wouldn't cost too much more on Apple's part, and it would make the high price a lot more justifiable.
i don't get the point of needing a hard drive if it streams anyways.
TV...My many issue with it is that after every show I watch or after I listen to an album I have to re-sync to my library, which takes about 10 minutes.
Why don't you just change your source to your mac and stream everything? You'll have access to everything all the time. I stream mine from my mac off an external harddrive and have yet to have a hiccup.
I think he has a defective unit, mine does not do that. FWIW, I want to watch / listen to stuff when the Mac is not on.
just take the laptop into the living room
i mean, look at its features, just take the laptop into the living room, it isnt worth the money just to stream content from your computer, i mean, even the new ipod has more storage than it
😀 That post made me happy.😀So use an $1100 item when a $299 one will do?
Now THAT is dumb.
Personally I think the aTV is a great idea but I'm waiting for an update to it. Prices will come down eventually, and I'd like to see it support more video options, like the free streamed versions of TV shows most networks are now offering.
TV has far more potential than some people give it credit for. The basics behind it will soon be more prevelant, but for now, a small percentage of the population will be "testing" it and the rest of us will wait until we're ready for it.
TV. The price of 3
TV units is a lot lower than 3 laptops. Other benefits:
TV at the same time. I may not do both, but a family member might want to watch a movie while I'm traveling.
TV.I know it's the video being cached, but that doesn't change my point - once that's done which takes 3 seconds tops, then I have no issues whatsoever across my 802.11g network.
I also never said that it is a perfect device and that it couldn't be improved. I was just disagreeing with MikeL who said he wouldn't want to be at the mercy of a 802.11g connection.