I agree not everyone here has engaged genuinely, but as someone who doesn't agree with your statement "including the 1m cable doesn't make any sense except greed" (maybe paraphrasing), I believe I responded (post#72 and a little in #148) genuinely and in good faith by offering ways that I see it possibly making sense (feel free to disagree). This is not to say that Apple definitely didn't do it out of greed because I try not to make judgments of that sort (unless absolutely necessary, as I find intention often tricky to figure out/know). Nor do I believe that I am a good judge of what Apple should and shouldn't do. I only offer what I believe to be possible non-greed-motivated logic behind their decision.
To reiterate my arguments--if high price is the reason Apple is obligated to include the 2m cable, then that implies that Apple is justified to include a 1m cable with the rumored cheaper MacBook. It also implies that Apple is obligated to include a 2m cable with their more expensive iPhones and Watches etc. I imagine most don't believe that to be true, and if so, then cable length is really just about device type and usage, not about price. You maintain that because Apple advertises the iPad Pro with the Magic Keyboard as a possible laptop replacement that a laptop length cable should be included with the iPP. But I think there is a jump in logic because then why not also argue that Apple should include the MK with the iPP or at least package them together since they are advertised together? Of course it's because not everyone uses the iPad Pro as a laptop, some use it as a tablet because that's what it is baseline. So it makes sense to include the tablet usage length cable with the iPP. As I said in post 148, I think you would have a stronger case of saying that the 2m cable should be included with the MK.