Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

ITC Rules For Apple in Patent Case, Bans Some HTC Imports [Update: HTC Responds]

kdarling said:
However, what's worrisome about patents like this one, is that it must've been obvious enough for someone at Google or HTC to independently come up with the same method.
Click to expand...

Sure. They've never heard about the iPhone. They must have came up with the same ideas due to them not copying Apple. :rolleyes:
 
neiltc13 said:
Ridiculous. Apple's patent was proved invalid by someone on the internet - why was this evidence not brought to the court?
Click to expand...

LOL that is the funniest thing I have read in a long time! Alright, all you lawyers, judges and clerks just stop what you are doing. "Someone" on the interwebs has it all figured out!
 
*LTD* said:
In 2007 Steve got up on stage, having come completely out of left field with a landmark product and declared "boy have we patented it!" This goes for most of Apple's products.

Fair warning. Apple's version of the patent game was never any secret.
Click to expand...

Google either thought he was kidding or could get around it by giving Android away "for free." :rolleyes:
 
So what the patent covers is for example bringing up the dialer when you tap a number string that could be a phone number?
 
Mattie Num Nums said:
Just build the phone and let the consumers decide. Chances are they will still want the best phone which is the iPhone. Just let the people make the choice not the courts. These patents aren't make or break patents.
Click to expand...

All these fines and damages and legal fees add up, and put more pressure on Android device manufacturers who are already operating under thin profit margins. It's not going to put HTC out of business, but anything that hurts their bottom line isn't good.
 
Mattie Num Nums said:
Just build the phone and let the consumers decide. Chances are they will still want the best phone which is the iPhone. Just let the people make the choice not the courts. These patents aren't make or break patents.
Click to expand...
I agree with this. Just let the people decide what they want.
 
The ban is full of sound and fury, Signifying [almost] nothing.

HTC will update their devices with an alternative. There won't be any actual "ban"
 
samcraig said:
The ban is full of sound and fury, Signifying [almost] nothing.

HTC will update their devices with an alternative. There won't be any actual "ban"
Click to expand...

Almost nothing? The threat of the ban appears to have convinced them to stop violating the patents that they were found to violate. Isn't that the point?
 
513 said:
So to summarize, Apple lost all the patents against HTC, but won only 2 claims, AND it's only on some HTC devices AND it takes effect only in the end of April AND HTC just said that their "designers have created alternate solutions for the ‘647 patent."

So what did Apple win here ?

EDIT link : http://www.androidcentral.com/htc-f...devices-will-be-banned-import-come-april-2012
Click to expand...

They won the "Hey, lets come out looking like retards to the entire tech. community (sans LTD et al.)" award.
 
Icaras said:
Yea lets just throw away innovation and the law to the side. Who needed those anyway?
Click to expand...

Or let another company spend all their time and money for R&D and implement these changes into our own design when they come out with them.
 
inlovewithi said:
So what the patent covers is for example bringing up the dialer when you tap a number string that could be a phone number?
Click to expand...

Yes. Completely ignoring the fact that phones (and computers) did this long before the iPhone was unveiled.
 
BaldiMac said:
Almost nothing? The threat of the ban appears to have convinced them to stop violating the patents that they were found to violate. Isn't that the point?
Click to expand...

First - you're assuming that they knew they were in violation of a patent in the first place.

And the point of the lawsuit was to get them to stop. The ban was the result. That's the point.

(edited for clarification)
 
White & Case attorney Bijal Vakil :
“I don’t see today’s ruling as a game changer,” he said, adding that one or both parties can appeal the case to a federal court and that HTC could also seek a further stay of the ruling, pending that appeal."

So what, is it going to take one year for those stupid 2 claims to take effect ?

Do you still see a win ?
 
linuxcooldude said:
Or let another company spend all their time and money for R&D and implement these changes into our own design when they come out with them.
Click to expand...

All their time and money? Come on. I wrote a J2ME app back when i was in school that did this using (server-side) regex. Took me less than a day. And, my idea was hardly novel. In fact, i'd used it way prior to that for web development, inspired by its use elsewhere. From the looks of it, the patent is nonsensical (then again, most software patents are).
 
AJH1993 said:
Name ONE of Apple's patents that hasn't been filed in order to sue other smartphone manufacturers.
Click to expand...

Name them yourself. The nearly 800 granted patents this year is listed at LatestPatents.com.

Since 2004 it's rather clear Apple's nearly 4,000 patents granted is more than just smart phones, ipods, ipads and the like.
 
kdarling said:
So, out of the original ten patents that Apple tried to use against HTC, which later got knocked down to about four, they prevailed only on one that is of comparatively low value, which can be gotten around or removed before a ban takes place.

--

Computers have supported discovery of phone numbers, email addresses, etc in a document for a very long time. On phones, Blackberrys have been doing it for years.

All this patent is about, is one particular way of doing that, and that should be fine.

However, it must've been obvious enough for someone at Google or HTC to independently come up with the same method. Heck, just look at how many close previous references are listed in the patent, most from Microsoft. Hmm. I wonder if they could license HTC a different way...
Click to expand...

That seems like the logical conclusion, given the extensive prior art. Still, how something like that is even patentable is beyond me. Either way you look at it, its a friggin Lasagna recipe.

----------
Plutonius said:
Why didn't they implement this initially ? Is it easier to copy and hope that you don't get caught ?
Click to expand...

Or, they just happened to implement the same solution Apple did. You know, it would take less time to actually implement this on your own, than going through Apples patent portfolio looking for their exact implementation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back