Like I said above, I wasn't speaking in absolutes. There are cases where the dog goes against the grain. But this is not common. If you want to keep defending the incredibly false idea that pit bulls are just bad dogs, be my guest. But you're wrong.
Well, I'm actually correct, statistically speaking. In a three year period from 2006 through 2008, 59% of all deaths from dogs were by pit bulls. But let's not let something like facts and actual statistics cloud our judgment, right? After all, it's all the owners' fault, right?
By the way, thanks for taking one thing I said out of context and disregarding everything else I said, which actually somewhat agreed with what you were saying.
Because the more you say it, the harder it is to take out of context:
Their bad reputation is due to horrible dog owners, not the dogs themselves.
There really aren't any bad breeds, just morons with dogs.
Yes ... the most dangerous dog breeds ... when raised by horrible owners.
...they are raised to do stupid things for stupid owners. That is the entire point of all this.
The dogs get a bad reputation because of bad owners.
There are no inherently bad breeds, just crappy owners.
Most of the time, however, problem pets ... or dangerous pets ... are a result of the owner ... nothing else.