Isn't that what Apple Lossless is for?Still no FLAC support (not that I was expecting it).
Apple Lossless is not free. That's what FLAC is for.
Isn't that what Apple Lossless is for?Still no FLAC support (not that I was expecting it).
I'm not upgrading from iTunes 7.2 until they make sorting sane again.
Symbols come before numbers which come before letters. This 'gold standard' of alphanumeric sorting has been used for ages -- even the good old Dewey Decimal system recognizes this.
In iTunes 7.3, Apple decided -- against all conventions -- that it was a good idea to put symbols and numbers after letters when sorting tracks in the library window. I was certain at first that this was a bug, but numerous releases later the behavior is remains the same. This drives me nuts, and I refuse to adapt.
Hopefully they will make it suck a little less on windows.
What I would like to see before that is HE-AAC/aacPlus. People with the smaller flash based iPods like the nano and touch will benefit from it (High Quality at 64kbps). Plus the internet radio in iTunes will also sound much better because a lot of the stations use that codec. But since iTunes doesn't support it they play back at regular AAC.
Why? I don't see any reason to since they already have a lossless format.
Better management of duplicate video and song entries will be included
Apple petition to support open-source FLAC lossless audio codec
I encourage all people who are interested in iPods, iTunes, iPhones and Apple TVs being able to natively support FLAC to contact Apple (politely) and ask for Apple to adopt this open-source free lossless standard format (FLAC) in all their audio products. That way Apple will truly have open, standard (read non-proprietary) support in their popular iPod, iTunes and other products that can freely be read by other competitior's software and hardware products.
The more open formats that Apple adopts, the better we all are. Being tied into proprietary Microsoft WMA (DRM and non-DRM) and Apple ALAC formats is not wise in the long run and will require audio conversions in the future. Better to support a popular, non-proprietary, free lossless format now.
More: http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=53975&st=0
Would you like iTunes to support FLAC? So would we!
Due to the design of iTunes, only Apple can add support for FLAC [1]. And why wouldn't they? FLAC usage is accelerating, many bands like Pearl Jam, Phish, Dave Matthews Band, Metallica -- the same hip, influential people whose fans Apple courts -- are already distributing music in FLAC format, and users are clamoring for it in the iTunes forums:
* [2] "I have seen a lot of people on live music message boards turn away from the iPod because there are other music players that support FLAC. I am on the verge... and I am an Apple die-hard!"
* [3] "If your source material is FLAC (as many bands have gone this way to distribute online music) your choice is to use another music player ..."
* [4] (many more requests)
Make your voice heard! Fill out the iTunes feedback form (politely!) and let them know. Feel free to also direct them to this page. We at the FLAC project stand ready to help as well. http://www.apple.com/feedback/itunesapp.html
XiphQT, through tremendous effort by developers, goes as far as possible in allowing some playback capability via QuickTime. But proper iTunes support -- tag handling, no import delays, etc. -- is not possible without Apple.
http://flac.sourceforge.net/itunes.html
FLAC support in Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard SDK?
What does it mean "supported (...) via its developer SDK"? That's a quite inaccurate statement and I don't think word "supported" can be used with what there is in the Leopard developer SDK. An example implementation of an AudioCodec built on top of libFLAC is all there is. Without any attempts to support any container file format that is used for FLAC (native FLAC, Ogg FLAC) it's of no use to normal users, and of little use even to developers. And there are no "FLAC tools embedded in the Leopard SDK".
For interested a bit more details on that subject in my post here. => http://barelyfocused.net/blog/2007/10/28/flac-support-in-mac-os-x-105-leopard/
I would like this too, although for now I've been using the comments field to accomplish this, only 1/2 way through my library thoughI grab the info from Allmusic.com btw.
I think it's time Apple made a significant change to the iTunes icon. A CD seems... outdated....
A feature I've been hoping (and writing to them) for is to have a Bookmarks menu bar item. I shouldn't have to go searching or browsing to find a favorite artist/album. I should be able to click something like 'Bookmark This' on the page or in a menu and have it save the page in iTunes. I hate having to search for an artist and have a bunch of irrelevant other items come up.
I know they have more practical things to worry about like bugs, but this has been annoying me for as long as I've been using iTunes.
they should make it more like windows media player... i mean that piece of software is probably the best thing ms has done (and office too of course...)
iTunes for windows sucks.. it SUCKS in capital letters!!!
they should make it more like windows media player... i mean that piece of software is probably the best thing ms has done (and office too of course...)
iTunes for windows sucks.. it SUCKS in capital letters!!!
Apple Lossless is not free. That's what FLAC is for.
Apple Loseless isn't free? How much does it cost? Maybe because I don't use it I don't pay for it.