Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iWatch Rumored to Include UV Light Exposure Sensor
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Disagreed. While, after playing with a real UV meter for some days (I have a professional one) it's pretty easy to estimate the actual UV radiation on a given day (this is why I don't really use my UV meter any more), it's still good to have such a gadget with you or if you can't estimate the UV levels because you haven't had a chance to play with a decent UV meter to gain some experience allowing you to estimate the current UV level.
Of course, all depends on what kinds of UV regions it's capable of measuring. UV-A? UV-B? (Surely not UV-C; that is, around 185 nm, which is only useful to measure whether you have any direct exposure from non-natural UV-C emitters in, say, hospitals.)
Last edited:
To everybody questioning the usefulness of UV metering in an also outdoor sports-oriented gadget: just look around on eBay / Amazon - there are TONS of (to keep the costs down, pretty rudimentary (10-level), but, for running, perfectly adequate) UV meters for runners.
UV metering is definitely asked for by most outdoor sportsmen/women. And it doesn't take up much volume as opposed to, say, a Geiger-mueller counter.
UV metering is definitely asked for by most outdoor sportsmen/women. And it doesn't take up much volume as opposed to, say, a Geiger-mueller counter.
I call this one as totally false, reasons being a watch or band is worn under clothes as much as not, and not all of Apple's markets are sun blessed!
But you never know.
But you never know.
Runners / outdoor sportsmen(women) generally don't wear that much clothes, which makes the need for UV protection / estimation even more important. And if you do wear clothes, then, you don't get that much of an UV dosage. (Even light clothing essentially blocks all kinds of UV radiation.)
Employers want a sensor to indicate when workers are being lazy. An electric shock is then emitted!
Quite of few my co workers would have 3rd degree burns of they did that lol.
Probably. Not me though. I couldn't care less about Apple's watch, or "wearables" in general.
Got to agree here, a watch is such a thing of personal taste it is inconceivable that Apple could produce something aesthetically pleasing to enough people to make it worth while. I think its going to be a wrist band type device that doesn't necessarily replace a watch but more provides a vehicle to attach sensors and technology to the wearer.
That UI looks amazing. I just hope it looks similar to that (the UI, not the watch itself), because if it's like the way iOS 7 looks, I will pass.
So I'm sure this has been discussed elsewhere, but what is the advantage of having a live tracking of my blood's oxygen saturation at all times? What would I do with that information?
You must have some serious inside information. This product hasn't been revealed as anything yet. It's been rumored to be a wristband, just like it's been rumored to be a watch. No one knows but Apple.
No matter what it is, it will not help you become and/or remain healthy. That is the province of a healthy diet and exercise. Never been secret. If produced, it can help you monitor your health. There is a difference.
There is a system that measures the shape of the pulse waves with a wrist mounted sensor and then applies some very complex math to work out blood pressure. Im not sure if its a prototype or in use anywhere yet but cant see why they couldn't use that system at some point. The iphone is certainly powerful enough to do the calculations.
I agree that being able to monitor blood pressure almost constantly would be a literal life saver for many people.
That's like saying a fitness trainer too doesn't help you remain fit.
Anything which tracks the amount of steps you take, the oxygen in your blood, etc, and gives you valuable recommendation, helps you become/remain healthy.
The point I was trying to make is that it actually adds value to something you don't already have, as opposed to a smartwatch, which simply duplicates the functionality of your phone.
Yes, don't forget that Apple designs their products for use in California
(That's partly why no one else had rushed to do a capacitive screen. When you design in cold climates, you don't want something that requires taking off your gloves and/or using your nose. It's also why Apple thought it was okay to leave out 3G and depend on WiFi, which was far more ubiquitous in California at the time than anywhere else.)
So, back to the problem of the device seeing the sun. How about an Apple headband? No? Okay. Hmm.
Maybe Apple's going to blow everyone away by coming out with a StarTrek like comm badge that you wear on your chest or lapel. It could talk via Bluetooth to a hidden wristband for getting information that requires skin contact.
(half joking)
iFlop
Yes, people thought the iPad would be an 'iFlop,' but I wasn't one of them.
But I will say it about the iWatch, and the masturbatory zeal over its pending birth is puzzling. One, it's prone to banging against countertops and whatever else...and there you go. Two, viewing marvelous content on a tiny surface appeals to no one. Three, people will look stupid holding their wrists to their face trying to view all that 'content.'
Yes, people thought the iPad would be an 'iFlop,' but I wasn't one of them.
But I will say it about the iWatch, and the masturbatory zeal over its pending birth is puzzling. One, it's prone to banging against countertops and whatever else...and there you go. Two, viewing marvelous content on a tiny surface appeals to no one. Three, people will look stupid holding their wrists to their face trying to view all that 'content.'
Every time I put my watch on in the morning I get mad because it won't give me a UV reading. I'll be so happy with my life when this comes out.
Dunno, but I do know that it isn't going to be "iWatch." That name is just awful.
----------
You're getting the idea better than 95% of the people who post to these threads. Or who write these articles.
I'm pretty sure health monitoring has been a centuries old problem that has typically been solved through very expensive equipment and very expensive healthcare visits.
This could be an incredibly big deal for a lot of people. This could also encourage people to care more about their health (especially in an unhealthy country like America). Don't be too thick to see the potential.
Hmm. Need to go check the trademark database and see if "iBand" is taken. That seems to be the favorite choice.
If it is taken, and the owner is some rinky dink place in Maryland etc, then it's probably an Apple shell company holding the name for them until it comes out.
Ah! Should also check Chinese trademarks. Before the iPad came out, Apple grabbed "iPad" and "iSlate", IIRC. I found a while bunch of names that way.
--
EDIT: I checked. A law firm in Boca Raton Florida filed for "iBand" for remote phone alerts in late 2013. It smacks of an Apple surrogate.
However, that application was suspended because a Long Island accessory company had already filed it for watches a few months earlier. They must, of course, actually come out with a product using that name pretty soon (or file for an extension of time), or lose it. If Apple wants the name, they're going to have to buy it from them.
Last edited: