So far in the right direction
I've tested the iWork.com Beta... so far I've found it useful. I see others wish there was some editing allowed from those that help me review a document, but so far I think it does help me in a way other file sharing services don't.
The way I work with my clients (I'm a consultant) I need them to take a look to a document and give me their thoughts. If they get the ability to edit it directly, it automatically turns into a nightmare, while each reviewer changes/deletes parts on the document and forgets to put a red colored note, or a small text box to explain him/herself. Before you know it you get 5 different versions of a document that you have to sit and compare each of them... and worst of all, each reviewer can't argue for/against or build on the opinion of another reviewer, since they seldom share or read other reviewer's review. There´s a way (in PC/MSOffice) to email a document to a chain of reviewers, but one can't review until another finishes, and it tends to take forever until all reviewers get a shot at the document.
I find it useful, since when me and my colleagues work, there's always one (and only one) person responsible for a document and its final edit while others collaborate. I guess this stands for dissertation and investigation papers.
I think this beta is in the right direction... of course there are things missing and we still have to see how much will it cost and the terms and conditions they will offer for the service... we'll see.
I've tested the iWork.com Beta... so far I've found it useful. I see others wish there was some editing allowed from those that help me review a document, but so far I think it does help me in a way other file sharing services don't.
The way I work with my clients (I'm a consultant) I need them to take a look to a document and give me their thoughts. If they get the ability to edit it directly, it automatically turns into a nightmare, while each reviewer changes/deletes parts on the document and forgets to put a red colored note, or a small text box to explain him/herself. Before you know it you get 5 different versions of a document that you have to sit and compare each of them... and worst of all, each reviewer can't argue for/against or build on the opinion of another reviewer, since they seldom share or read other reviewer's review. There´s a way (in PC/MSOffice) to email a document to a chain of reviewers, but one can't review until another finishes, and it tends to take forever until all reviewers get a shot at the document.
I find it useful, since when me and my colleagues work, there's always one (and only one) person responsible for a document and its final edit while others collaborate. I guess this stands for dissertation and investigation papers.
I think this beta is in the right direction... of course there are things missing and we still have to see how much will it cost and the terms and conditions they will offer for the service... we'll see.