oh you got me there Apple, you got me there
It could be argued that the advantage comes from several more years of being in the market and a free to premium route that gives people longer with the service before they make the transition. You can't blame that on Spotify, though.A weak argument, imo. Spotify also has a paid plan and last time I checked it still had more subscribers than AM. What does a free plan have to do with it?
I think it is more of a statement about how they want to pay artists and whether albums have value over radio. Having a freemium service, as JI admits, would be much more popular than Beats1 and would attract a much larger group of people to the party. No, I think it is more of how they see music.I feel like Apple Music is never gonna add a free membership cuz beats1 streams would go down
Yea that toI think it is more of a statement about how they want to pay artists and whether albums have value over radio. Having a freemium service, as JI admits, would be much more popular than Beats1 and would attract a much larger group of people to the party. No, I think it is more of how they see music.
It should be noted that there was a study out a couple weeks ago showing Apple pays more per stream than Spotify. While I think it would be of huge benefit to Apple to have freemium, if their goal is to bury the competition, but it appears that they think it would hurt their image/branding.
Art can't be made if you can't eat.
I feel like Apple Music is never gonna add a free membership cuz beats1 streams would go down
You don't need to make art to eat...
I think art will be around with or without a paycheck from the recording side of it. Before records, music artists made money from performances....they still do. That market will still be available to them if they don't make money from streaming. According to studies, Apple pays more for streaming per song than Spotify, Pandora and Google, so if you care about artists making money, they are apparently the best streaming option.Plenty of precedents where an artist was able to excel cause they were able to put all their attention into a task. Dunno how Michelangelo would have gone if he also had to work 35 hours a week at Starbucks to pay his rent. Probably would end up spending his free time smoking bongs on the couch, caught up in the day to day grind.
Wish anybody would do soLooks like he is just making excuses for the tough questions TC and the board must be asking him.