Laslo, you really should stop... you're just getting deeper and deeper. Go with the old saying "If you find yourself in a hole, stop digging." Panaflex would be abhorred with your statements on video and film.
First off, HD will have to be compressed to fit on HD-DVD. HD takes a tremendous amount of space. There is no such thing as "HD film"... film is film and has its own grade. HD is in reference to digital resolutions and digital cameras. Film can be transferred to a digital HD resolution, but you can work with it at much higher resolutions before printing to digital for distribution. When you work at higher resolutions, it gives you the ability to do greater composting work and graphics integrations and even colour correction-- that ends up with a better finished product.
Frame rates are a whole different topic. Even SD (Standard Definition) in the US runs at 60fps (30 interlaced.) Movies at the theater run at 24fps. Right now, any movie theater will look better than at your house. So I guess that shoots your fps theory out. This is a much larger discussion that you'd think about resolutions, frame rates, media, and analogue sampling. If you're really interested, a good book to check out is The Art of Digital Video by John Watkinson published by Focal Press. It's a good primer on all of this technology and really has little to do with actually shooting film.