This happens with weak leadership. You end up with politics and Machiavellism driving promotions etc. It becomes corrosive to the company like a cancer which at some point consume the host.This makes Apple leadership sound catty.
This happens with weak leadership. You end up with politics and Machiavellism driving promotions etc. It becomes corrosive to the company like a cancer which at some point consume the host.This makes Apple leadership sound catty.
The image of Gruber in a foot long beard, sitting in a darkened room, in his penthouse suite, Kleenex boxes on his feet, watching the Aqua intro video on repeat, is hard to shake.But John Gruber has criticized Liquid Glass before yesterday's news. And specially, Alan Dye:
"Re-watching Jobs’s introduction of Aqua for the umpteenth time, I still find it enthralling. I found Alan Dye’s introduction of Liquid Glass to be soporific, if not downright *********ty."
There's a time and place for diplomacy and there's a time and place for brutal honesty. This is a time for the latterThere’s a way to write this that isn’t nasty and personal against one person.
That’s fair…that’s how he sees things. I do wonder if Apple users under 30 who don’t have the same allegiance to the legend of Steve Jobs would feel the same. I’ve watched the Aqua introduction, its fine….Jobs was a great presenter. I don’t find it that much better than the Liquid Glass intro 🤷♂️But John Gruber has criticized Liquid Glass before yesterday's news. And specially, Alan Dye:
"Re-watching Jobs’s introduction of Aqua for the umpteenth time, I still find it enthralling. I found Alan Dye’s introduction of Liquid Glass to be soporific, if not downright *********ty."
There's a time and place for diplomacy and there's a time and place for brutal honesty. This is a time for the latter
I think the fact that Liquid Glass is worse on MacOS than it is on iOS is not just a factor of iOS being Apple’s most popular, most profitable, most important platform — and thus garnering more of Apple’s internal attention. I think it’s also about the fact that the Mac interface, with multiple windows, bigger displays, and more complexity, demands more nuanced, more expert, interaction design skills.
Maybe that says a lot of the current leadership's apathy towards software UI. Under Steve Jobs, Apple was a design-led company. Under Tim Cook, Apple is an operations-led company, with design as a back seat. It's quite possible that the current leadership doesn't view creatives in the same manner that Jobs did. Put another way, maybe Dye wan't let go because he was better at playing the political game instead of doing great UI design.And if Dye was in that job because of Jony Ive why was he kept in that job after Ive left?
Most (not all) of the complaints I see about the Liquid Glass design are from Mac users, so there may be some truth to this.I couldn't agree more with this. I hadn't put my finger on it as well as Gruber does here, but macOS 26 just feels like such a worse experience than iOS 26. IMO the Liquid Glass experience is very cool looking on iOS (and even better on TvOS) but macOS feels like a sloppy port of the iOS design.
Blaming the guy who left Apple 6 years ago makes no sense. Who did Dye report to after Ive left? Why didn’t they replace him if he had no business being in that role?Back then, even if he knew, gruber probably wouldn’t have fought city hall.
Who promoted him? Well Jony. Tim would have blessed it but Jony picked his lieutenants.
So the dye stains are in Jonny’s hands.
I don’t think you get a product like the Vision Pro out of an operations led companyMaybe that says a lot of the current leadership's apathy towards software UI. Under Steve Jobs, Apple was a design-led company. Under Tim Cook, Apple is an operations-led company, with design as a back seat. It's quite possible that the current leadership doesn't view creatives in the same manner that Jobs did. Put another way, maybe Dye wan't let go because he was better at playing the political game instead of doing great UI design.
Well LG compromised utility and functionality for me for a change for change sake cosmetic change.Gruber's talk about Dye's loyalty to Apple ignores how Dye likely feels about the reaction to LG. Loyalty only goes so far if you feel attacked on so many sides, as he may be.
It’s sad watching these old school Apple commentators entering their “grumpy old man” phase.
You don’t agree with the design direction Apple’s taken in recent years. Totally fair. Design is subjective. But just because you don’t like it doesn’t mean the man doesn’t care about design.
Different people have different tastes.
Incumbency has its benefits.Blaming the guy who left Apple 6 years ago makes no sense. Who did Dye report to after Ive left? Why didn’t they replace him if he had no business being in that role?
The same people who praised Apple designs these recent years will now celebrate this and also praise Apple for choosing a good replacement. They will praise Apple if it decides to double down on current designs, and will praise Apple even more if they end up taking another direction.
I agree. Nor a risk averse company.I don’t think you get a product like the Vision Pro out of an operations led company
As I recall, people used to **** on Dye when he got promoted because he came from packaging design (which is funny with the amount of Apple users that keep their boxes for no reason).Biggest issue people have is Dye's background wasn't remotely in software design and it shows. If that many people in the field have issues with what he did, I don't see that as being grumpy.
All I know is I despise Glass UI. If he was responsible for that then I'm glad he left.