Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
He kind of hit the nail on the head with that diatribe. I especially liked the 1984 big brother reference. Quite appropriate as apple has been acting more like big brother and less "thinking different"
Yes. They failed to realize in 1984, being small up-and-comers and all, that once you do gain power you will always end up like Big Brother in the end.

Doesn't matter if you're a communist leader, innovator, entrepreneur, artist, hippie, fascist, anarchist, liberal, freedom fighter... if you actually do get people to follow your lead, you will ALWAYS end up as a paranoid, self-serving control freak in an ivory tower with all your fancy ideals flying out the window, while pondering how to best squash your detractors and competitors and how to best brain wash the masses into obedience: Thought police, Kool-Aid or The Matrix?

the more the story gets out, it becomes apparent this was a theft!
That's like saying "The more people actually go to theaters and watch Gigli, the more they'll realize that it wasn't as bad as everyone said". Maybe it was the worst movie ever, maybe it wasn't, but it's too late to change public opinion once the snowball has started rolling. And the ones who did bother to watch it and found it not entirely horrible aren't going to admit it.

The bandwagon goes where it wants to go. Once it has decided, however irrationally, that Apple = Gestapo, Apple will have to work 200 times harder to prove that it isn't quite the Hitler's henchmen the rumors speak of. It's not like the bandwagon is going to stop and go "well you know, now that we have more information from both sides I'm starting to see this thing in a whole new light. Apple is cool again in my book!". To turn it around you need to build a 20 ft concrete wall or something.

So The law doesn't really apply when there's public image at stake? LOL
I don't think you should ask the poster about that, I think you should ask Steve.

- Hey Steve, would you be willing to give up some of the Apple brand's value in terms of perceived coolness, in order to ensure that one person is punished for picking up a mislaid phone and selling it to a tech blog instead of returning it?

What do you think he would respond?

A) True, we have spent several decades and billions of dollars on honing our brand image. As post-hippie Californians we thrive on being perceived as cool and laid back, and considering the amount of grass we've smoked over the years and all the naughty little things we did, like steal the "iPhone" trademark from another company without flinching, maybe we shouldn't be ones to talk. But, what the hell, I'm willing to throw all that away to see these punks nailed.

B) Abort! Abort!
 
I agree. Steve Jobs is definitely taking this too far. A lot of people that were indifferent about him, now don't like the guy (based on what I've been reading in news articles and on forums).

+1... Steve is upset because Gizmodo took his spotlight on the KeyNote. Now he cant present the iPhone as first time. Next time you want secrecy, dont let the items get out from Apple Headquarters. Stupid issue.:rolleyes: Move on and keep doing nice products...

BTW, I love Apple products... I will buy the iPhone and MBP 15" i7.... APPHOLES....
 
Very well stated. You'll notice that very few posts in the forum are riding the fence. They either see very clearly that a felony was committed, or they see that Apple is an evil monolithic empire, kicking down 'the little guy.'

This is called moral relativism... where everything is 'relative' unless it happens to you - then it becomes a big deal and a reason to be indignant. Those who are claiming they now see Apple as the new Microsoft are delusional. They think they hate big business, but are too delusional to realize how they benefit from big business. There are corrupt companies out there, but many choose to throw out the baby w/ the bath water. They align themselves ideologically with the likes of Che Guerva and his ilk, who would not and could not deliver an innovative device like an iPhone at a price for the common man, and then demonize the company that brings them the products they cannot get enough of.

It's hypocrisy that has gone into hyperdrive.

Yeah, keep in mind this is all over a phone. An expensive toy for grownups.

Missing kids and amber alerts don't get this kind of attention unless there is a particularly "sensational" aspect to it.

Let's keep this in perspective.
 
I agree...

Yeah, keep in mind this is all over a phone. An expensive toy for grownups.

Missing kids and amber alerts don't get this kind of attention unless there is a particularly "sensational" aspect to it.

Let's keep this in perspective.

Thank You. I posted something similar on another site when the break-in, or whatever you want to call it, was first reported.

Think about it. Law enforcement officers couldn't find Jaycee Dugard for 18 yrs, and had even visited the home of her abductors after complaints from neighbors about what they were hearing, yet didn't even enter the home or search the property. I realize they probably had no way of knowing she was there, but something was definitely not right, and they knew the owner of the home had a criminal history.

Obviously, there's plenty of money behind the task force to protect the toys. If the same motivation was behind finding an abducted child, she would have been gone for only 18 days instead of 18 years.

It is time to gain some perspective, and get our priorities straight.
 
Totally agree with Jon Stewart. I think apple could have spun this in a positive way, but instead went all 1984 on Jason Chen not cool
 
it's funny how people say it's just a phone. It's not that its just a phone its the PRINCIPAL of it.

It's like a store owner who catches someone who steals a canned good that costs .98 cents. Most store owners would prosecute that person to send a message.

Same thing with the iphone. Is it okay because it's just a phone that a trade secret should compromised? Obviously some people on this board don't understand how competitive the industry is.

And as for this hurting Apple i doubt it really makes apple look like "The man" Maybe some geeks will feel that way or some people who want a reason to dislike apple.

But Apples sales are still at an all time high. The AAPL stock is high so im getting a great return. And i wouldn't compare Apple to some Orwellian creation.

A Company that is attempting to protect it's intrests is not evil. However a person who profits from Theft by monetary gain or in this case a Journalistic scoop is evil. Gizmodo is Reaping what it Sowed.
 
QUESTION: Would the police in your town break down the door of someone who stole your cell phone?

ADMIT IT... Answer? NOPE!​

And please let's go down the trade secrets route, we're not talking anything breakthrough here or nuclear technology. This was a crazed over-reaction by both local police authorities and Apple and they deserve to be roundly ridiculed, lambasted, and criticized for this complete waste of tax dollars and destruction of property and home invasion, all for a lost cell phone by a drunk guy in a bar.

Is your cellphone worth $8500 to Gizmodo?

Yeah, I thought not...
 
So everyone is clear now that Apple did not kick down anyone's door and that Jon Stewart was pretty far off the mark, right? If you want to argue that Apple should not report felonies to the police, be my guest, but that was the extent of Apple's involvement.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.