If you need to "do the math" to show how different your watches are, you're in trouble.
"Hey, we have the same watch!"
"No we don't, (points to different color wrist band) do the math, buddy."
They spent all this time designing something that wasn't a different design than what's already offered by other companies. Their marketing team has a lot of work to do to convince you a clone of what's already in existence is the next new thing.
Imagine the sigh of relief every Apple competitor let out once they saw what was going to be the market dominating device.
1. It's water resistant. You're caught in the rain, wash your hands, no problem. Waterproof watches (submerging the whole watch in water) are a very niche market.
2. Apple has not stated any battery life yet, and the only rumor of battery life is 2-3 days. You must be thinking of the Android Wear watches.
I assure you if the battery had been anything to speak of they would have spoken about it being tremendous but 12 hours after you put it on itll probably be timeless.
you're missing his point...the millions of possibilities is from the customisable clock face etc.
Please do remember that in Keynote 2015 they will introduce iWatch 2 that they say: "This is best design ever!". And repeat that every 2 years or so.
Watch is not something that people switch every 2 years like phones. Or maybe Apple have created demand that was not there before
I love my Pebble as it's timeless design. It will not be outdated after two years.
That's pretty much what some said about the iPod. History tells us a different story.
I mean, if any company gets up and says "our new phone isn't as good as last years", I think that company is in trouble.
or they just don't know yet and are still optimising? or they want to keep that back as a positive surprise?
It's not mandatory to pick a conclusion that supports your bias.
If you need to "do the math" to show how different your watches are, you're in trouble.
"Hey, we have the same watch!"
"No we don't, (points to different color wrist band) do the math, buddy."
They spent all this time designing something that wasn't a different design than what's already offered by other companies. Their marketing team has a lot of work to do to convince you a clone of what's already in existence is the next new thing.
Imagine the sigh of relief every Apple competitor let out once they saw what was going to be the market dominating device.
Now that is debatable whether apple would refresh this watch every year. It could be just like apple tv right now that got refresh every 2-3 year.
Obviously the next iteration would be thinner design and perhaps longer battery life.
But this product is so not like Apple where they would show you one design that fits all and what they think is right. Apple gives 2 screen sizes with 3 different model / materials and also multiple straps to personalize the watch.
So it is really something to see that Apple gives customisation and choices for their brand new product category.
It's also what the industry told us about (insert self-serving product here), and they were correct!
If you have something to market you market it. They werent done optimising Siri but they still put it out.
I repeat. That battery is not, as the last keynote claimed for some features, tremendous, cool, incredible, fantastic, etc. etc.
If i would buy a smartwatch, it would definately be the Moto 360, that thing is just so beautiful. But this i/apple/whatever Watch is just plain ugly.
Apple watch looks great !!
I don't understand the complain people have, look at apple site http://www.apple.com/watch/ and you would appreciate the craftmanship that goes creating this.
Great job Apple.
How can a designer with such credentials produce something looking so naff.
And then try to justify it with what amounts to the sort of styling options you put on kids jewellery.
Did he hear the words all designers hate - 'I had a go at a design', 'WE like this', or my wife/partner/friend is a bit of a designer' come from above?
This looks so forced .it's just plain butt ugly.
"Dumpster diving confirmed the Moto 360 features a four-year-old TI OMAP3630. Thats the same processor we found in the Motorola Droid 2 four years ago, as well the big cheese that powered their MOTOACTV smartwatch back in 2011. Oh, and we also found a battery that fell a little short of its advertised spec."
go for it...
you're missing his point...the millions of possibilities is from the customisable clock face etc.
What happened to Skinny Jony ??? Either he is buffing up for mr universe or has found the Apple Muffin stash.
Also I can see why he does not speak at the keynotes.....
"Dumpster diving confirmed the Moto 360 features a four-year-old TI OMAP3630. Thats the same processor we found in the Motorola Droid 2 four years ago, as well the big cheese that powered their MOTOACTV smartwatch back in 2011. Oh, and we also found a battery that fell a little short of its advertised spec."
go for it...
Looks great but is almost useless for anyone without an iPhone in their pocket with a data plan. That fact will be a reason many people don't purchase it.
Looks great but is almost useless for anyone without an iPhone in their pocket with a data plan. That fact will be a reason many people don't purchase it.
The question was:
How many different versions of the Apple Watch are there?
Changing the appearance of software doesn't make it a new version. How convenient of Ive to contort the answer to his narrative. Are there infinite versions of the iPhone because of different icon grid combinations?
Its sad Apple has to ensure journalists give them absolute cake questions and don't challenge their answers. If they're so confident in the products let them speak for themselves.