It’s quite interesting that if you look back at the first generation of the iPod or the Phone — what happens in the next two, three, four years is dramatic.
In our work, we've always tried to design in a way where you're not aware of the problems that we've had to solve. That's the job of the designer: to solve problems and explore, but not really drag you through what all the problems were.
And giving us grammar lessons to boot!Sometimes I suspect that Apple execs must sit around thinking of pompous phrases to repeat, that will awe the naive.
With Jobs, I actually had a strangely perverse admiration of the way he could twist the meaning of words. It was his forte. These guys are just Jobs-wannabes spouting nonsense.
Apple TV has failed to capture the hearts of many after so many iterations. Will Apple Watch go the same path? I certainly hope not for Apple's sake.
Loose a bunch of use benefits with your plan. I have version one with no regrets. By version 3 or 4 I maybe in the market if the new benefits are worth the costs. At any rate, Apple Watch has good value for me. Nice to see interest from those who are not already Apple Watch owners.I'm planning on skipping gen 2 of the Watch and nailing the 3rd gen. That's the plan for now anyhow.
Apple TV has failed to capture the hearts of many after so many iterations. Will Apple Watch go the same path? I certainly hope not for Apple's sake.
I think Jony's done an amazing job.
Someone has to balance all the bitching and moaning going on here.
this makes so much sense. I think someone finally decoded Apple's problem. Now to sit back and watch them shrink since they'll never be able to admit/ correct the above issues.You know... I see Ive, Phil and Cue as Apple's Mccartney. Hair force one, the hardware engineers, other software engineers, Scott were Apple's Lennon.
When Steve was alive, there was a balance in power. Since he died, Cook had to be CEO (face of the company, not part of the brain anymore. Beancounter), Scott is gone, and Ive/Phil/Cue got way more power. The balance was destroyed.
Consequence? The best beancounter on the planet has no one to put him in check, and despite having the best software and hardware engineers in the world, they are powerless against Ive, Phil and Eddy. Everything that comes out of Phil's mouth is pure ********. Ive needs someone to control his genius otherwise it all becomes excessive and narcissistic (rose gold. It's pink, dude.). Cue... I know nothing about him, but I know that he was in control of the MAS and iTunes and he killed both of them, as far as potential is concerned.
Steve itself doesn't seem very important to me. Apple was 100% the work of fantastic talented people. Steve wasn't a great engineer, or a great designer, or great at management. But he was great at putting those Paul Mccartney in check.
We see the result in Apple having the best products and ecosystem (iPhone 6s/6s plus/iPhone SE/iPad Pros/rMBP/iMac) and also the most useless, overpriced, outdated, foolish piece of garbage in the whole tech industry (Every iOS device being sold with 1GB of RAM or 16GB of onboard storage, HDD Macs, Macs with TN Panels, cMBP, Mac Pro with rebranded cheapass """""""""firepros"""""" and not pro at all.).
It all makes sense to me. Seeing Ive in that picture only intensifies this feeling.
I applaud and appreciate you for such an in depth assessment & understanding of what makes Apple, Apple. However I disagree with the less RAM, less storage assessment. I think every Apple device is always outfitted with the amount of power that it DESERVES for it's time. Cuz what you do with that amount of RAM/power is always continuously getting established. You can't properly establish the end use and function when you give the device more power than it knows what to do with. Once a couple things and end use have been established and outfitting extra RAM serves a true purpose WITH the software to SUPPORT it, then only does Apple takes the big plunge. Why did Apple outfit the watch with a measly A5 processor cuz its functions were still to be established. I've always believed this is what keeps Apple devices ahead and really what makes this company so great.You know... I see Ive, Phil and Cue as Apple's Mccartney. Hair force one, the hardware engineers, other software engineers, Scott were Apple's Lennon.
When Steve was alive, there was a balance in power. Since he died, Cook had to be CEO (face of the company, not part of the brain anymore. Beancounter), Scott is gone, and Ive/Phil/Cue got way more power. The balance was destroyed.
Consequence? The best beancounter on the planet has no one to put him in check, and despite having the best software and hardware engineers in the world, they are powerless against Ive, Phil and Eddy. Everything that comes out of Phil's mouth is pure ********. Ive needs someone to control his genius otherwise it all becomes excessive and narcissistic (rose gold. It's pink, dude.). Cue... I know nothing about him, but I know that he was in control of the MAS and iTunes and he killed both of them, as far as potential is concerned.
Steve itself doesn't seem very important to me. Apple was 100% the work of fantastic talented people. Steve wasn't a great engineer, or a great designer, or great at management. But he was great at putting those Paul Mccartney in check.
We see the result in Apple having the best products and ecosystem (iPhone 6s/6s plus/iPhone SE/iPad Pros/rMBP/iMac) and also the most useless, overpriced, outdated, foolish piece of garbage in the whole tech industry (Every iOS device being sold with 1GB of RAM or 16GB of onboard storage, HDD Macs, Macs with TN Panels, cMBP, Mac Pro with rebranded cheapass """""""""firepros"""""" and not pro at all.).
It all makes sense to me. Seeing Ive in that picture only intensifies this feeling.
You know... I see Ive, Phil and Cue as Apple's Mccartney. Hair force one, the hardware engineers, other software engineers, Scott were Apple's Lennon.
When Steve was alive, there was a balance in power. Since he died, Cook had to be CEO (face of the company, not part of the brain anymore. Beancounter), Scott is gone, and Ive/Phil/Cue got way more power. The balance was destroyed.
Consequence? The best beancounter on the planet has no one to put him in check, and despite having the best software and hardware engineers in the world, they are powerless against Ive, Phil and Eddy. Everything that comes out of Phil's mouth is pure ********. Ive needs someone to control his genius otherwise it all becomes excessive and narcissistic (rose gold. It's pink, dude.). Cue... I know nothing about him, but I know that he was in control of the MAS and iTunes and he killed both of them, as far as potential is concerned.
Steve itself doesn't seem very important to me. Apple was 100% the work of fantastic talented people. Steve wasn't a great engineer, or a great designer, or great at management. But he was great at putting those Paul Mccartney in check.
We see the result in Apple having the best products and ecosystem (iPhone 6s/6s plus/iPhone SE/iPad Pros/rMBP/iMac) and also the most useless, overpriced, outdated, foolish piece of garbage in the whole tech industry (Every iOS device being sold with 1GB of RAM or 16GB of onboard storage, HDD Macs, Macs with TN Panels, cMBP, Mac Pro with rebranded cheapass """""""""firepros"""""" and not pro at all.).
It all makes sense to me. Seeing Ive in that picture only intensifies this feeling.
Oh thank goodness I am not the only one who couldn't really find actual meaning to all those prettily accented words. And I was hearing his accent in my head as I read all his babble. He could be a politician. He said a lot without really saying anything.
Apple lost the hammer, "No Guy" with power. Replacement needed!I very much agree with your assessment. I see Steve as the director of the movie. He had the creative vision and he was able to work with a wide variety of talented artisans to craft a fantastic finished product. But there's no director now.
Phil is insufferable and you can tell he's sort of a middle of the road guy who has managed to rise probably higher than he should. Cue is the one I really don't get. He seems wickedly ineffective as a product manager...yet he continues to rise. Makes no sense.
And Ive, talented as he is, has turned into a raging narcisstic, an endless fountain of insipid quotes about design philosophy. Barf. You design gadgets dude. They are nice. But they are iterative and narrow in focus, not the second coming of design.
Cook is a great producer but every film needs a director with vision. I frankly think Ive's best work happened under Jobs, when Jobs could collaborate and control the ego. Since then design has more or less flatlined at Apple (other than thin!) and the UI work is becoming increasingly counterintuitive.
Make if he used glass and aluminum to design it it would have been better...What a boring and uninspiring outfit.