Love it if it's a kind of spider that crawls out of your pocket!
Without Steve Jobs, Jony Ive's industrial designs are underwhelming. Jobs brought out the best in Ive and kept his worst tendencies in check.
Although Ive and Scott Forstall did not get along, Apple was at their innovative peak when Ive was in charge of industrial design and Forstall was in charge of GUI design. Tim Cook was so cluless and mediocre that he fired Forstall and was so unisprining to Ive that Ive quit.
As for Scam Altman, it's highly doubtful that he'll be able to elicit the best in Ive, so their collaboration might result in industrial designs in the same leage of awfulness as the notch.
I understand that to some people, money is everything. And that kind of money ought to really make you not care about anything, but the truth is he once was relevant and now he’s not and that probably does get to him. I don’t want a device that is “contextually aware“ of everything around me at all times. I’d love to see a device that somehow enhances my privacy. Good luck to him either way.he just sold his company for $6.5b.. I don't think he really cares
Io was founded last year by Ive and three other people, and raised $225 million in VC capital before the OpenAI acquisition (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Io_(company)). The company wanted to develop devices, not provide design services like LoveFrom. Ive and LoveFrom remain independent and nevertheless will do design work for OpenAI. So the two companies are really for different lines of work.Its odd, we all heard of 'LoveFrom' but I never once knew of the existence of 'io' until they announced the purchase.
Was this company manifested as an offshoot of LoveFrom for the specific reason of being bought by OpenAI?
…Altman apparently told OpenAI staff it's "the coolest piece of technology that the world will have ever seen" after testing Ive's prototype at home…
This reminds me of the hype surrounding the Segway.![]()
Yes, "io" is a LoveFrom (LF) offshoot. Its staff, from LF and originally Apple, confirms this. OpenAI’s $6.5B equity buyout enriched Jony Ive and his team. This allowed Jony to sell a hardware venture while keeping LF’s brand and control intact. If io faces hurdles or legal issues (stolen data), LF remains unaffected, enabling Jony to continue unhindered. The separation frees LF’s remaining employees for other projects under Jony’s direction.Its odd, we all heard of 'LoveFrom' but I never once knew of the existence of 'io' until they announced the purchase.
Was this company manifested as an offshoot of LoveFrom for the specific reason of being bought by OpenAI?
It's a still from the video OpenAI posted last month.Is it just me, or does that photo of the two of them talking look AI generated? It has to be, right?
Why would he create hype around a product if he doesn't care?
he just sold his company for $6.5b.
Hmm, not wearable? How about edible, inhalable, injectable, or insertable?
io brownieHmm, not wearable? How about edible, inhalable, injectable, or insertable?
Not AI but definitely over-processed, over-coloured, etc. They're in Francis Ford Coppola's Cafe Zoetrope in San Francisco.Is it just me, or does that photo of the two of them talking look AI generated? It has to be, right?
He sold his company for $6.5b worth of "equity" that may never convert to anything liquid. He needs to earn his salary and he needs his new firm to actually generate profit before he dies.he just sold his company for $6.5b.. I don't think he really cares
My sister used to have this spider brooch that she'd put on her clothes. It totally freaked people out it was brilliant.Love it if it's a kind of spider that crawls out of your pocket!
Indeed, Jony and his partners own perhaps 5% of OpenAI (who owns "io"), which is built on stolen data and probably greatly overvalued, were it even built on proprietary data.He sold his company for $6.5b worth of "equity" that may never convert to anything liquid. He needs to earn his salary and he needs his new firm to actually generate profit before he dies.
Then battery life would supper, and still it isn't needed because we already have a watch and a phone.What if it's a Pencil?
If phones and watches didn't exist and GPT was more truthful and accurate then they'd be onto something. Given its Jony they'll surely make money, but longterm you wonder if they will have enough sales. Even making it a phone is a poor idea as they exist already and have the app installed. Perhaps the real reason for making this is GPT's attempt to not be replaced by another app.Rabbit, Humane, Friend. They all tried this and failed not just because the execution was bad, but the utility didn't exist.
Because he has more money than his future great-grandchildren will know what to do with (paper billionaire) and well, he’s not really into philanthropy or golf.Why would he create hype around a product if he doesn't care?