Nothing has been decided. All the judge said is that she won't force Amazon to stop using the term while the case is decided.
This won't be over for several years.
This won't be over for several years.
I didn't read the complaint, but did Apple really claim that "App" was short for or somehow signified "Apple"?
And, I agree, "App Store" is too generic on its own and should require a modifier: iOS, Windows, Amazon, Android, Apple, etc.
How is "Windows" generic? When has the word "windows" ever been used to describe an operating system?
Granted, it is a pretty generic term.. but you can't really tell me that when you hear App Store you don't think of Apple first? Android has for the most part been associated with the term marketplace. Apple pretty much made the term it is today, despite the generic aspect.
Apple should have obtained rights to it back in 2008.
...
The fruit is spelled McIntosh.Actually, a "Macintosh" is a kind of apple.
Agree with Microsoft should be granted those TM; and they have.I dearly hope we don't hear hear further cries of "but Word and Windows are really generic; how is it that these words were trademarked by Microsoft?"
Because "Word" and "Windows" have never been used to describe a word processor or an operating system. Trademarking "Appstore" is like trademarking "Grocery Store". It's absurd.
Is this an argument that the term is so closely associated with Apple that they should own it, or is it an argument that because you think of Apple first, it's not hurting them at all to have others use it (and may actually be benefitting them)?
How is "Windows" generic? When has the word "windows" ever been used to describe an operating system?
Microsoft has sued or threatened to sue several companies who used the word "Windows" in a product name.
Bad comparison. I somehow see a "GrocStore" trademark-able.
Application is generic. AppStore isn't.
This is absolutely worth fighting for. App Store should rightly belong to Apple in the context they use it. It's as valuable to them as the generic term Windows is to Microsoft. So I'm outraged by this news.
I dearly hope we don't hear hear further cries of "but Word and Windows are really generic; how is it that these words were trademarked by Microsoft?"
Because "Word" and "Windows" have never been used to describe a word processor or an operating system. Trademarking "Appstore" is like trademarking "Grocery Store". It's absurd.
I wonder what makes Apple decide when to use the i prefix and when not to. They seem to overuse it and risk diluting the brand but then do not use it when it might be good to. Why didn't they go with iApp Store?
Anyway Apple really brought the term App into the everyday lexicon. The term existed previously but only after Apple's iphone and app store did it become mainstream.
It doesn't have to have been used before. Both components of the trademark are generic terms, and together the term is generic. There were stores selling applications before Apple launched its "App Store" - heck, any retail store selling computer software could be described as an App Store.