Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I agree with News App complaints. I've never opted in to anything, never set anything up, but get pop ups once or twice a day for articles that are behind paywalls. It seems like such a featured part of the OS, but is clearly just annoying and cumbersome for most users. I turned off notifications, but you would think it wouldn't be so painful to walk the free and unintrusive route.

I miss the days when opting out of payment for digital media was simple. It will be fun to tell my grandkids about the old times.
 
The 'TC Approach' is to throw a bunch of ideas out there and see what sticks.

Granted, Apple have always made at least some poor software, but I feel like the ratio has increased dramatically over recent years as they've tried to dip their finger into too many pies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Selena Agna
The 'TC Approach' is to throw a bunch of ideas out there and see what sticks.

Granted, Apple have always made at least some poor software, but I feel like the ratio has increased dramatically over recent years as they've tried to dip their finger into too many pies.
At this point I’m not going to be surprised if Apple ventures into agriculture sector and provide AI solutions to corporations who are interested in that in the future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yvan256
I feel like this is being a little dramatic. I’m not saying some of the Apple software doesn’t need work but you also have to realize Apple is working on a smaller scale than Microsoft or Google.
Please elaborate on that. Because just like Microsoft and Google, they have more than enough cash in the bank to do basically whatever they want.

Apple makes their own hardware, their own operating system and their own applications. If anything, they're one of the few companies in the world to control the full stack, along with game consoles, Google with their Pixel phones and a handful of small companies making open hardware that runs a distro of Linux.

So what's happening here? Why can't Apple have good software like they did a decade or two ago? What changed, internally at Apple? Did they get rid of a centralized QA team, whose job was to also make sure that, for example, the weather app on the iPhone displayed the information in the same format as the Apple watch? Because unless the latest updates fixed it, it's not. My Apple watch displays the temperature at the top and the time at the bottom while my iPhone does exactly the inverse.

What's needed is someone at the top who has a clear view of what the future hardware and software should be for the users. Someone who cares about the users, not the shareholders. Someone who actively uses a Mac, not an iPad. Someone who cares more about the company's future than what the spreadsheet numbers need to be six months from now.

Tim still seems to be the master of the supply chain. He's clearly good with numbers and profit margins, but he's no leader and certainly no visionary. What's the point of Apple having billions in the bank if they cannot even maintain their own standards from one of two decades ago?

I think most Apple users care about such small details. But when the company no longer care about their loyal users, all they're left with is users who wouldn't blink twice about switching to another ecosystem. After all, if Apple becomes as bad as Microsoft then what's the point of overpaying for Apple's hardware and locking ourselves in their ecosystem?

We don't want Apple to fail, we want Apple to do better.
 
I share your frustration with the app. That is why I stopped subscribing to it, and went back to using 'News Explorer.' It doesn't give me the annoyance the News app did not to mention I don't have to worry about seeing any ads. I control the feeds I see etc.

Thank you for the infos: just bought it ! So much better
Same here. I've had an Apple one premier (haha) subscription for years and was so looking forward to crisp, clean news.

Boy, was I wrong. Apple news is junk. I open it about once a year to see if anything has changed and it is always such a load of frustrating, time-wasting junk. I only keep the subscription for 2TB iCloud (good), Fitness (good), Apple TV (good, but sparse) and Apple music (lousy UX, but tolerable otherwise)

Just bought "News Explorer" too. Thanks @Apple_Robert for the recommendation. Looks really good. A steal at $5.
 
My recommendation is to stop reading news entirely.
Unless your job is related to the news, there is nothing you need to know. You can't change anything and 90%+ is just clickbait without nuance anyway. And if there is something really important, somebody will text you about it. Let your friends aggregate for you and then go about your day without yelling at the clouds in the sky.
 
It's money. That's the motivation behind Apple bending its own App Store rules and why some developers try to get away with things—and they do.
 
Tim still seems to be the master of the supply chain. He's clearly good with numbers and profit margins, but he's no leader and certainly no visionary. What's the point of Apple having billions in the bank if they cannot even maintain their own standards from one of two decades ago?
Tim and all of his executive buddies would just milk apple for as long as they can before packing up and moving out, leaving the company dry and die. After all, even if Tim is sacked now, he already earned way more enough for him and his family, several generations over.
We don't want Apple to fail, we want Apple to do better.
Unfortunately only shareholders have a say on that. And if their collective will is demanding Apple to fail (regardless of their true intention is), Apple will fail regardless of customer support.
 
I subscribed to Apple One not least because of Apple News.

And my God, is the app for that a stinker. It's a very modern Apple app, in that it's borderline user-hostile and scratching Apple's itch, rather than the user's.

Hidden sources​

So, you can hide news sources you don't want. I don't care for tabloids here in the UK, like the Sun and Daily Mail, so I hide them. But... Their stories still appear in the news feed! Just greyed out.

View attachment 2538256
That is so incredibly useless and intensely annoying. Why show me this?

You can make News hide these, via one of its few config options. Just tap "Restrict Stories in Today". But doing so means you lose features – you can no longer see Top Stories, Trending Stories, and Featured Stories.
View attachment 2538257
Why is Apple being so user-hostile here? Restricting headline categories like that is just an arbitrary decision. It has nothing to do with the fact I don't want to see certain news sources.

Accessibility isn't​

I use News on my phone and iPad mini while in bed at night. At that point I've taken out my contact lenses and no longer wear glasses. I have to enlarge the text.

There's no global setting to do this.

I have to adjust this setting individually for every single news source. This is infuriating. Open a news story. Squint. Tap to enlarge text. Repeat, ad nauseam.

Why isn't there just a central setting, like Books, to adjust the font scaling?

Can I change the fonts being used, say to a sans serif font that's easier to read for people with poor eyesight? No. Not even for individual sources, never mind as a global config option.

Configuration? Nope.​

There are almost no configuration options.

I don't care for sports, for example. Some news web sites let you simply hide the sports section. Can Apple News do this? Nope. You're getting sports whether you like it or not. Here's the range of configuration options for the Mac version of the app. Just four of them. OK I know Apple sweats the small stuff. They aren't Microsoft or Linux, firing 1000 config options at you. But this is absurd.
View attachment 2538258
At the top is the aforementioned option to hide news sources I've deactivated – that also kills much of the News app functionality. I'm pretty sure they made this so obtuse for licensing reasons. The corporations they're signed-up with just didn't like users having the power to hide their content, so Apple created a messy compromise that still showed hidden content.

Below that is what feels like a legal requirement from Apple. Scratching their itch...

Third is sports!

Fourth is a bizarro game centre option. What?! Again, Apple scratching their itch to encourage more use of their ecosystem. That was considered so important that it was developed over, say, a basic config option to increase font sizes globally. Who does Apple care about here?

No history​

EDIT: There is, in fact, a history list of articles you've viewed. It's just hidden away. You have to tap the Following option. Yes, that's right.

There's no way to search the history, perhaps because the list flows in from the cloud as you scroll (so isn't all in memory when you first look at it). You can tap and hold on each entry, though, to get useful options like saving it, or sharing it.

Sometimes I tell my wife about an article having read it the previous day, and she asks me to share it with her. But there's no history within News. I can't find it without manually searching. True, if you go in to the app after a break it will highlight the most recent news story you were reading. But you can't get it to show you all the stories you viewed, say, yesterday.

This is super simple. I mean, a teenager designing a news app as part of their computer science school qualification would have that on their feature list.

Useless tables of content​

If you open one of your subscribed magazines and look at the index/table of contents, it's just headlines. No descriptions. Sometimes you get author names beneath.
View attachment 2538259

For example, let's look at the last article in that screenshot. It's about saving lives from synthetic opioids. OK, I might be interested. Is that about government/political action? Is it about care teams on the ground assisting people? Is it a science article about how somebody's created a new compound that helps? I've no frickin' idea.

Again, I feel as if Apple deliberately leaves out descriptions to encourage consumption. I have to tap through to find out. I engage with the content in any event. Win for Apple! But please, why am I being manipulated like this? I'm the one paying for this service. I'm not the product being sold here. Or am I?

"Today" = days or even weeks old​

I've put this one at the end because it's not as bad as it used to be. But it's still an issue.

When you open News, you see the "Today" list of stories. That's stories from... well, today, right? Nope. Stories in that list can be days or even weeks old. OK, so it might still be be good content. But stories can move fast, and frankly anything over a few days old may well have developed beyond that original write-up.
View attachment 2538268

EDIT:​

See below for some comments below about the appalling ads we get served, which are basically the same as spam: "Women in your area are looking for men like you etc." Often with horrible AI slop images and copy. Is this really the best Apple can manage?

/EDIT ENDS​

"It'll get better"​

I know what you're going to say. Apple News is a relatively new app. It'll get better over time.

The Apple News app is 10 years old. And it was actually an app that Apple bought in from outside, it's actually even older.

Apple News+ is six years old.

These are not baby apps and services. They should be much better at this point. Imagine if Microsoft had launched Word and taken the same approach. 10 years after launch and it's still a basic text editor.

But this is another sin of modern Apple, as well as launching basic stripped down apps like this.

They launch... and abandon.

Apple's developers are like school kids playing soccer. Soccer should be a strategic game where players keep their position on the pitch, and only deal with the ball when it comes their way. But on the school playing ground, it's basically 10 kids chasing a ball. They all want their heroic moment. They all think they're better than the other players. They all don't want to do the boring work, like maybe position themselves for a pass so they can actually score a goal.

And I think Apple's development culture is like this. Nobody wants the dull thankless work of improving existing apps. They want the hero work of doing the cool new stuff. They're chasing the ball. This is probably how Apple attracts the upcoming talent leaving college.

I'm just disheartened that Apple is so... well, crap at certain things. It could be so much better. All of the above is super simple. It would take a single developer maybe a week or two to implement, never mind a team. But Apple just has zero interest.
Images are the biggest pain point for me. In many Apple News+ articles you can’t pinch-to-zoom an inline image, and on far too many of them you also can’t tap to open a larger, standalone view. That means anything with detail—maps, charts, infographics, screenshots —becomes a squinting exercise on a phone. Even rotating to landscape rarely helps; the image just sits there, small and fixed, with no way to inspect the finer points.

This isn’t just an annoyance, it undercuts the journalism. If an image carries key information, readers need basic tools to examine it.
 
In many Apple News+ articles you can’t pinch-to-zoom an inline image
Great point. Apple puts the layout decisions of the publisher ahead of the user.

The reason is probably copyright related. I think the whole reason why the News app is so poor is related to rights, in fact. I suspect Apple probably presented the app to these corporate content providers, got it signed off, and now can't change it without asking them again. And that's expensive and difficult. For whatever reason, Apple failed to build in vital features before they showed it to the content providers, like proper accessibility, or the ability to view images full-screen. It's just a hot mess.
 
Click-bait headlines which don't even match the headlines that the source uses
2-week old news articles that age worse than 2-week old fish
Spam ads in the middle of articles for obviously scam products
More than half the price of NYT for less than 5% of the news
But someone must be paying for it, or they'd just shut it down
 
I have been an Apple computer user since the Apple II+ days. I've always loved Apple and their software. But for the last 5 years or more, I have been tolerating the poor quality of Apple software. What was once industry leading (by miles) is now so antiquated, so broken, so obviously not cared for, that I have just about lost any reason to stay with Apple. Windows is no better, but at least I'd be free from the pain of seeing Apple continually drive itself into the sewer.

I look back and see the begining of Apple's spiral into mediocrity when Aperture was discontinued. That software created an entire class of software that didnt exist before: Digital asset management. It took Adobe YEARS to catch up with Aperture. For god knows whatever reason, Apple just let Aperture languish and die. A company with hundreds of BILLIONS of dollars in resources couldnt be bothered to keep one of their gems alive.

Unbelievable.
Absolutely. Aperture was a game changer, and you never had to worry about photos being mismanaged or lost the way you do with Lightroom. I would still pay/subscribe to an Aperture-like service from Apple; it was just so much easier to use than the alternatives.
 
I love the content on Apple News + and subscribe for this reason. However, not having an ability to sort or categorise Saved Stores (folders, tags, anything...) is a real problem for me. I've left feedback to Apple about it a few times.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dyllisphiller
OMG, I forgot to mention that.

Ads! And they're not even good quality ads for premium products. It's the awful base ads, that are literally like spam. I'm married but I get targeted by dating ads for "older women". It's horrible and creepy, with the horrible AI slop artwork, too.

1000s of ads telling me what to do with my pension, too. It seems Apple's ad dept knows one thing, which is that I'm middle-aged. I do turn off ad personalisation.

I think I've managed to block ads in News, however, by using an ad-blocking DNS. Some text ads still appear but I think I've got rid of the visual ads.
100% echo all your points, including this one about the Ads...ads in Apple News are the most annoying, intrusive and irritating ads I think I've seen ever, in any app or web app....so much AI slop, and HUGE animated images of people's feet for some reason, advertising a 'naked shoe' over and and over and over again....when I pay for a paid news service, I expect either no ads or very few ads, but Apple News serves the worst ads and there's zero difference between free vs paid when it comes to this. Surely a paid subscription should mean that 50% of your screen isn't taken up by pictures of some guy's feet....
 
It's not going to get better at all. Apple software is by far, some of the worst software I have ever used. This goes way beyond the news app. All across the board, if the software comes from Apple, it's usually the worst in the industry. Look at what Apple did with Darksky. It's just appalling how poor Apple software is. They simply just don't care.
This is actually very accurate. Their backends are even worse. Unreliable, opaque, no logs, no history, zero visibility. A support system that is the great wall of China - only it extends from ground to the high above - they are the last word, no escalation path, no recourse unless you want to legal and if your country does'n't have some sort of class action thingie or a robust consumer resolution system (which mine doesn't), good luck getting even response or going anywhere.

The only reasons Apple survives are: its fan base (it has a small customer base; and giant fan base), and the fact that Google tracking everything you do - and you can test it, verify it and the Android OS is open source (almost entirely). The sad part is so does Apple, it just that you can't do much to verify that.

Apple sells good hardware (with almost ZERO repairability), pathetic software and even more pathetic cloud services in the name of privacy theatre.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eric Idle
It's not going to get better at all. Apple software is by far, some of the worst software I have ever used. This goes way beyond the news app. All across the board, if the software comes from Apple, it's usually the worst in the industry. Look at what Apple did with Darksky. It's just appalling how poor Apple software is. They simply just don't care.

It's all about the money now. Nothing more.
I've never used Dark Sky, I jumped on the Apple bandwagon quite recently, but I have now learnt that it was integrated into the Weather app. I have to say, the Weather app in Mac OS is probably the best I have ever used, at least among the ones that ship preinstalled (I should say I have never looked for alternatives).
 
Was going to say... I don't know if I support the statement that ALL Apple apps are horrible. The news App is a terrible app. But I don't for a second think Safari, Apple Notes, iMessages, Music, Photos, <list goes on, I won't bore you> are horrible apps.

As someone using Apple since 2011 for my personal computing (lifelong Windows user (still use it to work everyday)) - I like Mac OS's ability to stay out of the way so I can do what I want to do without needing to update, customize, fix, tweak, whatever. Apple is not perfect perfect but I like what the ecosystem does for me and don't see leaving it anytime soon.

Apple News ... however ... is an abomination and pushes me closer to that edge where I start looking elsewhere.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JoeSilver
100% echo all your points, including this one about the Ads...ads in Apple News are the most annoying, intrusive and irritating ads I think I've seen ever, in any app or web app....so much AI slop, and HUGE animated images of people's feet for some reason, advertising a 'naked shoe' over and and over and over again....when I pay for a paid news service, I expect either no ads or very few ads, but Apple News serves the worst ads and there's zero difference between free vs paid when it comes to this. Surely a paid subscription should mean that 50% of your screen isn't taken up by pictures of some guy's feet....
Use NextDNS to remove the ads.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire
IMG_4345.jpeg


This is from a channel which is blocked. It’s absolutely absurd, not to mention that I don’t need to see this first thing when I wake up.
 
I agree with all the comments here, but what I find the most frustrating about Apple News is that it literally refuses to show stories from the sources I follow in my For You section.

The sources I follow, including my Favorites, are less than 1% of the stories in my “For You”. The only time I see news from my sources is when I navigate directly to their channel.

“For You” should be called “For Apple”. As the OP commented, Apple is determined to scratch their own itch by forcing THEIR favorite sources down my throat no matter how many times I click the dislike button, and no matter how many times I click the like button on stories from my sources.

It seems hostile to ignore the user’s preferred sources when creating their For You page. The only alternative is Restrict Stories in Today, which eliminates ALL suggestions and curation.

Another annoying thing is how close the like/dislike buttons are to the back button. I’m constantly hitting them by mistake when trying to navigate back to my feed.

I had deleted Apple News a few years ago and hadn’t used it again until now because I got it with Apple One Premium. I’ve already cancelled my subspription after seeing how bad it remains. New features like Puzzles, Sports and Recipes don’t interest me, yet they’re also hardcoded into the menu bar and forced on the user, so Apple can rub our noses in their “premium” Apple News+ features.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.