JUUK Revo Review: Modern Apple Watch Link Bracelet for Under $200

Discussion in 'Guides, How Tos and Reviews' started by MacRumors, Dec 12, 2015.

  1. MacRumors macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    Apple's 42mm Stainless Steel Link Bracelet is arguably the most luxurious Apple Watch band available, but at $449 it may be worth considering similar but less expensive third-party options available. Enter JUUK, a new company that aims to fill that niche with its lineup of Revo stainless steel link bracelets for under $200.

    [​IMG]

    JUUK, pronounced "juke," is a watch company created by Eugene Ho, a Canadian with nearly two decades of experience in the watch industry. Ho, who moved to Hong Kong in 1997 to establish Pacific Watchworks, has worked on popular brands including Hugo Boss, Tommy Hilfiger, Timberland, Ecko, Reebok and many others.
    Revo stainless steel link bracelets for Apple Watch are offered in polished, brushed or gunmetal finishes for between $145 and $195. A trio of 42mm bracelets are available to ship immediately, while 38mm bracelet pre-orders will ship in late January 2016. 42mm polished or brushed spare links are also available for $12 each.

    Given the popular adage "you get what you pay for," this review will take a closer look at the design and fit of the 42mm Polished Revo model, $195, to see how it compares to Apple's 42mm Stainless Steel Link Bracelet.

    Design

    JUUK's 42mm Revo has a premium look and feel. The link bracelet is crafted from 316L stainless steel, the same grade used by Apple and many Swiss watchmakers, and this particular model has a lustrous all-polished finish. The modern design closely matches the stainless steel Apple Watch's polished case, but like other bracelets of its kind, it collects fingerprints easily and is more susceptible to surface scratches.

    [​IMG]

    In my two weeks of testing the Revo, being careful not to graze it on any hard surfaces, the bracelet still collected some surface scratches visible in natural light. The underside of the Revo is brushed to better hide those blemishes, a common practice in the watch industry for polished bracelets, but opting for the 42mm Brushed Revo entirely may be the better option for Apple Watch users who are less vigilant.

    While Apple began selling "Made for Apple Watch" lugs for official third-party bands in October, the Revo has unofficial adapters on each end of the link bracelet that slide into the Apple Watch casing with ease. The adapters have locking mechanisms on the underside that must be pressed in for a secure fit. Some third-party Apple Watch lugs do not fit very well, so I was pleased this bracelet worked without any issues.

    Click here to read more...

    Article Link: JUUK Revo Review: Modern Apple Watch Link Bracelet for Under $200
     
  2. byke macrumors 6502a

    byke

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2007
    Location:
    LDN. UK
    #2
    I am honestly waiting for Apple to release the Apple watch 2, which will feature a slightly modified lug design (maybe slightly thinner?). Making all Gen 1 watch straps obsolete.
     
  3. Fzang macrumors 65816

    Fzang

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2013
    #3
    Don't be silly. They'll all be compatible with the new $79 adapter. Sold separately, of course.
     
  4. pgiguere1 macrumors 68020

    pgiguere1

    Joined:
    May 28, 2009
    Location:
    Montreal, Canada
    #4
    $195 is pretty expensive for an accessory that looks cheap because of the logo on the back. It's pretty big and looks like the logo of an electronics accessory maker, not of a watch brand.
     
  5. HoosBruce macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2013
    #5
    There are ones for $80 on Amazon and eBay that look much better than this and get great reviews. No thanks
     
  6. LewisChapman macrumors 6502a

    LewisChapman

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2015
  7. shareef777 Suspended

    shareef777

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2005
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    #7
    I picked up a black stainless steel one for $40 off Amazon. Anything over $50 is a rip off. They're all made in China.

    Actually even cheaper:

    https://www.amazon.com/dp/B011A3Q0NG/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_awd_HJiBwbMCBAAZR
     
  8. Brien macrumors 68030

    Brien

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2008
    #8
    I would've bought their Lucarno model in a heartbeat but sadly it looks to have been scrapped.
     
  9. fhall1 macrumors 68040

    fhall1

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2007
    Location:
    (Central) NY State of mind
    #9
    Make sure the "black" is anodized and not just painted on the steel. Even anodized black color will eventually wear at points where the band is always contacting another surface, but the cheap painted bands will scratch off after one scrape.
     
  10. SteveJobs2.0 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2012
  11. ke-iron macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2014
    #12
    That looks cheap to me. It's really hard for 3rd party companies to match the quality and finish of the Apple Watch bands.
     
  12. MH01 Suspended

    MH01

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2008
  13. Piggie macrumors G3

    Piggie

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2010
    #14
    Hard to tell from photo's
    The Apple strap looks cheap in some photo's also.

    Likewise you need to balance price against quality with all things.
    It's like when they review say a $100 tablet against a $500 tablet and they put as a negative the speed or screen of the $100 model, forgetting it's a fifth of the price.

    One should dam well expect a strap that's over twice the cost to be better.
    Is it twice as good? No.
     
  14. SR22pilot macrumors member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2014
    #15
    I have one. The logo isn't bad at all. Because the back is flush it is understated. This is a very heavy band. It feels more like a Rolex Presidential than the much lighter Apple band. Whether you like this is a personal thing. I love the heft. Mine is brushed so it looks closer to the Apple band. However, the sides are still polished and look much better than the Apple band. The band blends very well into my stainless watch. The clasp is nice in terms of looks but a Rolex Presidential feels better as does the Apple clasp. I have nothing but good things to say about dealing with the company. They met their commitments and communicated well. It isn't cheap but it is made to a very high standard so the price is fair. Pictures are posted on the third party band thread on Mac Rumours.
     
  15. Studivan macrumors newbie

    Studivan

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2015
    Location:
    Philadelphia
    #16
    This is a copy of an early Hoco band bought on eBay for about $50.00
     
  16. Marzzz macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2002
    Location:
    The Desert
    #17
    Developing a patina of minute scratches is a fact of life with a SS bracelet, and not really considered a flaw. Owners of $10,000 Rolexes consider it a badge of honor, and wouldn't even think about having the bracelet polished...
     
  17. SR22pilot macrumors member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2014
    #18
    I seriously doubt it. The quality of finish and the quality of the steel used matches very expensive bands. It does use a similar clasp design. Otherwise it isn't close. I think the look is better than the Apple band and I like the greater heft.
     
  18. ke-iron macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2014
    #19
    I rather pay twice the price to have the best looking band. It's so noticeable how cheap and inferior this band looks compared to the Apple Watch stainless steel band. Just go to apple website and look at the pictures, the differences are so obvious. http://www.apple.com/shop/buy-watch...h-link-bracelet?product=MJ472LL/A&step=detail

    I'm glad you like it, but it doesn't compliment the clean lines and finish of the Apple Watch. This band is noticeably inferior.
     
  19. roland.g macrumors 603

    roland.g

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2005
    #20
    I bought a similar band that I think actually looks nicer than the JUUK off AliExpress in August for $90. No logo. A bit more matte. Looks identical to the Apple Watch SS Link band, except for the sizing pins on the side like this one (only on the last 5 links) and the clasp which is like this and not an Apple Watch clasp replica. It is nicer than the JUUK for half the price and at a glance looks like I am wearing the Apple Band.

    That's what should be reviewed here.
     
  20. Denmac1 macrumors 6502a

    Denmac1

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Location:
    Lost in Space
  21. SR22pilot macrumors member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2014
    #22
    I own the band and have had it on my watch in the Apple Store. I like the Apple clasp better for comfort. I much prefer the heavy feel of the Juuk. I prefer the polished sides of the Juuk. Mine is brushed on the top and bottom.

    I am amazed at the comments from people who haven't seen the band in person.

    If you want a light aluminum feeling band then this isn't the one for you. It does not feel light like a Casio link band. This is heavy stainless.
     
  22. Enygmatic macrumors 6502a

    Enygmatic

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2015
    Location:
    Various
    #23
    Guarantee the lugs won't be different; if and when the Watch 2 is released, look for band compatibility with Gen 1.
     
  23. kildraik macrumors 6502a

    kildraik

    Joined:
    May 7, 2006
    #24
    Ridiculous spellings of names that are nonsensical and uninspiring always drive me away from a product or service, regardless of product viability.

    Am I the only one?

    The strongest part of any system or product lies in its weakest component... I wouldn't trust this product because of it's crap name, and definitely looks as good as what's it's price point is.
     

Share This Page

35 December 12, 2015