Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Sounds like a good time for Apple to introduce the first laptop running under the A12 chipset reducing their dependence on x86 and macOS 14 eliminating 3rd party app support and App Store only and elimination of iTunes music download purchases.
 
  • Like
Reactions: npmacuser5
How can technologies like Thunderbolt 3 push forward if Apple keeps selling products with obsolete technology? And a 900p non-IPS display in 2018?

Just lower the price of the Retina MacBook (they’re on sale all the time, anyway), add a second USB-C port, and be done with it. People buy the Air only for it’s affordability, anyway.

And while they’re at it, update the Mac mini as well.

You do realize the current MacBook doesn’t have Thunderbolt 3 right? Adding a second non-Thunderbolt 3 capable USB-C port wouldn’t solve that. In its current form factor, with the current processors being used, there are likely not enough PCI lanes to support Thunderbolt 3. Even if there are, they would likely have to reduce the size of the battery, affecting battery life or make the computer significantly larger. It would also likely increase the price.

That is why Thunderbolt 3 is aimed at the Pro/Prosumer market.
 
Last edited:
Sounds like a good time for Apple to introduce the first laptop running under the A12 chipset reducing their dependence on x86 and macOS 14 eliminating 3rd party app support and App Store only and elimination of iTunes music download purchases.

Now that's an interesting premise. Although I'd love to know if Mac owners would miss x86 support. In the business world, it's still a very Windows centric and having that option to boot into it is a selling feature.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HobeSoundDarryl
For all the people who are advocating reducing the MacBook price:

No, people aren't buying the MacBook Air for its price alone. There are number of issues that plague the MacBook that don't touch the Air. Here are eleven reasons people prefer the MacBook Air (11"):

1. Battery Life — The MacBook Air gets better battery life, especially if you're programming a lot on Xcode; coupled with the fact that the MacBook doesn't unambiguously shut off (there seems to be a low-power sleep mode that it likes staying in when charging, as well as turning on during charges), the MacBook Air more efficiently uses its battery and keeps its charge from day to day

2. Weight — The MacBook is heavier when you factor in all the dongles you have to carry for multiple port access (one port isn't enough for power supply + mouse + USB connector to device for programming). The MacBook Air 11" is much lighter weight, all supplies included.

3. Size - The 11" is far more portable. It has more ports, its screen is wide enough for side-by-side comparison without being tall enough to become a hindrance on airplane and train tray tables; the 12" screen is a hindrance because the taller footprint requires a more acute angle of screen bend to stay open, especially when the seat in front of yours reclines. The MacBook's extra screen size also makes it a poor fit for tray tables on airplanes and trains, while the 11" MacBook Air opens perfectly on those same tables, even if the seat in front of yours reclines. (Keep in mind people in Japan are on trains all the time, so being able to work from a traytable is a major win. In fact, all the Japanese people that I know on Apple laptops opt for the 11" for this very reason alone.)

4. Arrow Keys — The new keyboard's arrow keys are harder to move up-and-down quickly due to half-size, unresponsiveness. Tabbing up and down on the MacBook keyboard is a nightmare because it's easy to slip and hit the wrong arrow, which throws off line edits in prose and code. It also doesn't respond as crisply to fast arrow strokes up and down, since they occupy two halves of the same square "key."

5. Trackpad — The MacBook's trackpad has too many levels of depression, highlight & drag too error-prone, can get sticky and stuck in depressed state. Many people prefer the simpler one-click type in MacBook Airs. It has fewer levels of state and depression.

6. USB-C Only — no support for old-style USBs, non-Apple mice that many people use with receivers.

7. USB-C Power — The non-magnetic port is too difficult to connect, easy to pull laptop on a trip. I have to carry multiple MacBooks due to battery life constraints, and now have to carry two AC adapters (heavy bricks!), several USB converters, and Lightning cables to program on my devices. Weight increases about fourfold.

8. Blind Charging — no red/green light to differentiate full charge, like the MacBook Air's MagSafe 2 adapter. It's also hard to know if the MacBook stays off during charging. It makes a sound (that you can't mute), and sometimes when I open the lid despite having shut it down the night before, it's already turned on.

9. Charging Sound — Despite mute speakers, this beeps audibly & annoyingly on connection to power. Some people like students work in libraries or public transport and need to mute everything.

10. Keyboard — The MacBook keyboard sucks. It is loud & clicky, the keys are too close, unresponsive arrow-up, and is typo-prone if your fingers are flying fast and rely on key depression ("travel") for positive/negative feedback on correct keystrokes. The MacBook Air is the smallest, lightest machine with the old-style keyboard.

11. Power -- The MacBook, despite increasingly better chips, still cannot rival the Air for development tasks like building large Xcode projects and editing in Photoshop/Illustrator. Despite its age, the Air still has the better processor. I'm working on a fully upgraded 11" Air (2015), and it outperforms the fully-speced MacBook from 2016 on builds.
The 11" Air's screen sucks in comparison. Even ignoring the fact it's not Retina, the quality and viewing angles just aren't in the same league. In fact, that is the main reason I never ever bought the 11", even though that's the form factor I had wanted for a long time.

Dongles are not great, but if you don't need them then the 12" MacBook is significantly lighter. Furthermore, the MacBook charger is lighter. Also, the thing will even charge off an iPad charger with just a USB cable. The one adapter I bring with me though is a USB 3 to USB 3 adapter, which is just a few grams.

The 2017 MacBook keyboard is a vast improvement over the 2016 MacBook keyboard. That said, I do prefer the MacBook Air's keyboard. However, in 2017 the MacBook keyboard is more reasonable. I agree the 2016 MacBook keyboard sucked.

As for the trackpad, the MacBook Pro wins here. In fact, I prefer my 2009 MacBook Pro trackpad over the 2015 MacBook Air trackpad and the 2017 MacBook trackpad.

The 2017 MacBook CPUs are a significant speed boost over the 2016 MacBook CPUs. In Geekbench 4, the MacBook Core i7 beats the MacBook Air Core i7, and the MacBook Core m3 (and i5 of course) beats the MacBook Air Core i5. Assuming Apple doesn't upgrade the Air much this year or next, then the 2019 MacBook will be much faster than the MacBook Air, because it's likely going quad-core in 2019.

The 12" MacBook works great on planes and trains. In fact, that's why I bought it. The 12" is only 3% taller than the Air, but it's actually 6% narrower, which means it actually has a smaller footprint than the 11" Air. However, both are good for planes and trains. In contrast, the 13" Pro and 13" Air are kinda awkward in economy class.

You do realize the current MacBook doesn’t have Thunderbolt 3 right? Adding a second non-Thunderbolt 3 capable USB-C port wouldn’t solve that. In its current form factor, with the current processors being used, there are likely not enough PCI lanes to support Thunderbolt 3. Even if there are, they would likely have to reduce the size of the battery, affecting battery life or make the computer significantly larger. It would also likely increase the price.

That is why Thunderbolt 3 is aimed at the Pro/Prosumer market.
The MacBook will mostly like get quad-core and Thunderbolt 3 next year with Ice Lake Y. There has already been leak indicating this, in a Y series 5.2 W chip (slightly higher wattage than the current Kaby Lake Y 4.5 W chip).

This makes perfect sense, since Ice Lake has Thunderbolt support built in. No need for an extra chip. In addition, IIRC Ice Lake upgrades USB C from G1 5 Gbps to G2 10 Gbps, again with no extra chip needed.

My original hope was to wait for a TB 3 / USB C Gen 2 MacBook, but after learning it wasn't coming any time soon, I got the 2017, which got the improved keyboard and the HEVC hardware upgrades, in 2017.
 
Last edited:
Apple ARM entry system with MacOS and IOS apps, great idea. Awesome for many on a limited budget, and those that need more functionality then IOS alone offers. Still use the Intel for the Pro models. Apple goes its own way, we do not get a vote.:(
 
  • Like
Reactions: jpn
It's just a recompile of code. Click a button and boom.

They would still release a DP of some kind, even if the compiler handles 99% of the code they still need to test and debug.

Remember, there have been problems going from iOS to iOS and macOS to macOS on the same architecture.
 
Sounds like a good time for Apple to introduce the first laptop running under the A12 chipset reducing their dependence on x86 and macOS 14 eliminating 3rd party app support and App Store only and elimination of iTunes music download purchases.

What would this be good for?
They would immediately loose a lot of the education market, at least in the technical and science domain. If MacOS becomes a closed shop and can not run things like Homebrew, etc. people are forced to leave the system. Myself included...
 
Not quite. While it's true the MacBook Air will be faster in some tests, the difference is marginal, and in other tests the 12" MacBook is actually faster now. For example:

MacBook Air Core i7: 7500
MacBook Core i7: 8525

With about half an hour of sustained load, the MacBook Core i7 will lose about 6% of performance, which in Geekbench 4 still puts it about 500 points ahead of the MacBook Air.

Furthermore, the 12" MacBook can do full hardware decode of 10-bit HDR 4K HEVC h.265 with 25% CPU load, whereas the MacBook Air can't decode that cleanly at all even with 100% CPU, since it's all decoded in software.

And in 2019 (not 2018), the 12" MacBook will go quad-core if the leaked info on Ice Lake Y is accurate.

I don't think the GeekBench benchmark is very good. In the GeekBench test thermal throttling doesn't take place which is why the iPhone beats the MacBook Pro in GeekBench scoring.

I think Cinebench testing is okay. The Retina Macbook slightly outperforms the MacBook Air in the Cinebench single-threaded test, but the MacBook Air is a little better at the multi-threaded test:

Cinebench R15 single-threaded 64-bit:
* 2017 Retina MacBook (base model) - 120 points
* 2017 MacBook Air (base model) - 116 points

Cinebench R15 multi-threaded 64-bit:
* 2017 MacBook Air (base model) - 277 points
* 2017 Retina MacBook (base model) - 265 points

score results sources:
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Apple-MacBook-Air-13-2017-Laptop-1-8-GHz-Review.230010.0.html
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Apple-MacBook-12-2017-Laptop-Review.230656.0.html

I don't think having hardware 4K decoding is important on the Air which only has a 1440x900 display. And the Retina MacBook only has a 2304x1440 display, so it probably isn't worth using anything larger than 1920x1080 videos on it.
 
Expect it to be ARM-based as it's a great way to test the market. If you want a real Intel MBA then grab one now.

If we get something like Jason Snell's "iBook" it will be using the MacBook form factor, not the MacBook Air.


About the Air in the education market: Apple can't compete with Chromebooks at all. Sure, an Air is definitely better than a flimsy Chromebook, but officials won't care.
It's price, price, price. Either make Air so cheap that you sell at a huge loss or Apple is going to lose anyway. And I'd bet that Apple won't be doing the former.

Price is more than just the ASP. Plenty of reports of how fragile Chromebooks are and how expensive they are to maintain from an IT standpoint. If a Junior High School needs to replace a $200 CB every year (across three years assuming Grade 6-8) and spend $1000 over the three years to support it, a $800 MBA that will last all three years and costs $500 to support suddenly looks to be the better value since it saves you $300 over the life of the student.
 
Just looking at the current state of the Mac lineup is a conglomerate headache.

To be on topic, I'd like to see the Air updated (and Mac Mini) ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: jpn and Appleaker
I don't think the GeekBench benchmark is very good. In the GeekBench test thermal throttling doesn't take place which is why the iPhone beats the MacBook Pro in GeekBench scoring.

I think Cinebench testing is okay. The Retina Macbook slightly outperforms the MacBook Air in the Cinebench single-threaded test, but the MacBook Air is a little better at the multi-threaded test:

Cinebench R15 single-threaded 64-bit:
* 2017 Retina MacBook (base model) - 120 points
* 2017 MacBook Air (base model) - 116 points

Cinebench R15 multi-threaded 64-bit:
* 2017 MacBook Air (base model) - 277 points
* 2017 Retina MacBook (base model) - 265 points

score results sources:
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Apple-MacBook-Air-13-2017-Laptop-1-8-GHz-Review.230010.0.html
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Apple-MacBook-12-2017-Laptop-Review.230656.0.html
Indeed. The speed difference is less than 5%, even in Cinebench. However, Geekbench is a reasonable measure of burst speed, which is how most people use their ultraportables. People are not generally doing 20 minute renders on their machines.

Either way though, the point is that as of 2017, a base model Core m3 MacBook roughly matches a base model Core i5 MacBook Air.

However, this will likely drastically change in 2019, as the Y series chips are strongly expected to go quad-core.

I don't think having hardware 4K decoding is important on the Air which only has a 1440x900 display. And the Retina MacBook only has a 2304x1440 display, so it probably isn't worth using anything larger than 1920x1080 videos on it.
Except that if you have a video that's already 4K, you're not going to re-encode it just to watch it on a MacBook.

Even iPhones encode video in 4K HEVC now, and QuickTime and the Photos app leverage Intel Quick Sync for decoding those videos.

Price is more than just the ASP. Plenty of reports of how fragile Chromebooks are and how expensive they are to maintain from an IT standpoint. If a Junior High School needs to replace a $200 CB every year (across three years assuming Grade 6-8) and spend $1000 over the three years to support it, a $800 MBA that will last all three years and costs $500 to support suddenly looks to be the better value since it saves you $300 over the life of the student.
From what I've read, Chromebooks are both cheaper to implement and easier to administer, since the OS and software are perfect for this.

Part of the reason they are cheaper is not necessarily because they use inferior quality parts, but because the overhead of the OS is so much less, so one can use lower performance but still high quality parts. I retired my 2008 white MacBook a while back because it was stuck on OS X 10.7.5, and because without SSD it was simply too slow. I tried it with SSD and it sped it up, but without a more recent OS it was still unusable since none of the current browsers etc. ran on it. Finally I removed the SSD and put the HD back in and fully retired it... only to eventually put Chrome OS on it. The thing now flies with 4 GB RAM and spinning HD, and runs a current version of Chrome browser.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jecowa
My concern would be on what they consider "cheaper" and what they'll cut to reach this.

I wish they'd put back certain older hardware components. I doubt that is what they have in mind. Also that I'll be able to afford their idea of cheaper either.
 
It’d be nice if they update the older MacBook Pro they sell without the touchpad. More up to date specs.
 
Considering the age of The CPUs inside the MacBook Air I wouldn’t be surprised wirh it being discountinued or uprgarded to a recent CPU.
 
There's no way they can continue shipping an updated MBA with that screen, can they?
They've done it for this long. If they decrease the price, they can continue doing it for even longer.

Considering the age of The CPUs inside the MacBook Air I wouldn’t be surprised wirh it being discountinued or uprgarded to a recent CPU.
My guess is that in 2018 they will keep it on Broadwell. Certainly they won't upgrade it beyond Skylake though.

I also predict that macOS 10.14 will bring DRM'd HEVC streaming to Mac, but that will be limited to Kaby Lake and beyond.
 
12 inch MB (fanless, no GPU, below 1kg)
15 inch MB (fanless, no GPU, 1kg)
15 inch MBP (8GB NVIDIA GPU, 1.8 kg)
17 inch MBP (16GB NVIDIA GPU, 2.5 kg)

Why the emphasis on the nVidia GPU? Apart of CUDA, which is utilised in a few apps only, I do not see any significant advantage to AMD's Vega.
 
I'll be buying so long as they don't make any drastic changes to ports or power cord. Any upgrades in speed/display would be nice. My 2012 is still cruising along.
I totally agree. My 13” mid-2013 is still a solid machine. I really hope they don’t do away with MagSafe. I was looking to pick up a MacBook Pro, but still prefer to have the MagSafe and SD card slot.
 
Cheaper MacBook Air? Why not just add a usc-c, keep MagSafe 2, and add a lightning port, update the screen and watch the sales sky rocket and overtake the crappy MacBook.

HomePod has poor sales, who would have thought that... the problem is Tim Cook trying to maximize sales with the worst product possible. Why not invest some money in Siri! He is probably too concerned with his bonus.


Totally agree with AirPod, they are solid and have a bright future. Better future without the greedy fool Tim Crook!
 
Last edited:
They will sell Macbook with 128gb. Case closed
No way that MacBook Air gonna get a Retina display, if so, who would buy the 12 inch ones?
Who buys MacBooks now?
At my kids expensive private school which is BYOD, the MBA is the most common laptop, followed by HP Spectres and Dell XPS.
You could probably count the total number of MacBooks on one hand.
 
I don't know what kind of discount Apple gets off list for their CPUs, but the Broadwell CPUs in the current MBA list for higher prices than (newer) Haswell parts with better performance and the same wattage. So Apple could save money just by updating to a newer generation of CPU/iGPU and pass that on to lower the ASP.
Haswell is older than Broadwell. All the Haswell parts came out in 2013-2014. All the Broadwell parts came out in 2015. The Skylake laptop parts came out in late 2015.
 
I like the 12” MacBook but cannot justify its price. Either add a port or two or drop its price $200. But put an end to the Air; it was a great laptop that Apple stopped caring about.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.