I'd pay $40 for this piece of plastic... not $200
Wirelessly posted (Johnny iphone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)
This seemed nice but equates to nothing more than an overpriced, flop IMHO
No tb, gb-Ethernet, FW800?
Like others have said - this dock is fine for MBA 2010 and prior models; not us TB owners!
I find this really odd, how come they bother with the usb? All a Macbook air dock would need it a thunderbolt and power connector, basically mimic the connector coming form the thunderbolt display but ending up in a hub and transformer for power. Yes a dual cable leading to the hub, not some complicated contraption to fasten the computer in.
Dah!
----------
Perhaps because its not meant for 2011 MBAs.
Whatever they do I hope they get the Thunderbolt license and make a Thunderbolt dock.
There IS definitely Thunderbolt licensing as it has been copyrighted, registered, etc.
Apple learned its lesson after FireWire licensing slowed adoption - the Thunderbolt port and controller specification are entirely Intels. Similarly, theres no per-port licensing fee or royalty for peripheral manufacturers to use the port or the Thunderbolt controller.
This is just awful! Put $200 towards a TB display. Cheap looking, additional psu, limited to 10/100mb Ethernet, terrible.
HengeDocks should make an air-compatible model and blow this one out of the water.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)
They need thunderbolt support. And support for 2560x1600 instead of only 2560x1440.
set them up with several million $ so they can hire engineers, management, and pay for an advertising campaign. oh yeah, and get those licenses handled. then all they'll need is a Chinese sweatshop and you'll have it on the shelves at Best Buy.
Nice idea to dock on both sides...but with Thunderbolt this isn't necessary.
$200 for a rather ugly looking dock that doesn't even give you gigabit ethernet...I'll pass.
Good for 2010 MBA owners I guess.
My wants for a dock for my Air:
- 1 Cable (Thunderbolt)
- Can have an external plug for powered ports
- Display port/TB daisy chain port on the back
- Gigabit ethernet port on the back
- 2 USB ports on the back (For a desktop KB/Mouse
- 2 USB (3.0 if possible) ports on the front (for easy access)
- FW800 port on the back (for external drives)
Make it brushed aluminum to match the Air and sell it for $99. Would work for every laptop and even desktop with a Thunderbolt port.
There is a huge difference between licensing and a licensing fee! You are mixing those up which you really shouldn't. I was only responding to the part for having a license to use it and for that you have to because it is registered, copyrighted, etc. You also need a license to use the SDK (which is crucial if you want to create thunderbolt products) and/or to log into the official thunderbolt website. So yes, you do need a license in every aspect. You nor I said anything about fees, that's what you are talking about now. If you want to know more about that I suggest contacting Intel via the link to the official website.Of course it's intels property, but that does not mean that there is a license fee on top of the actual asking price of the controller. This is what Anandtech wrote about it a while ago.
It needs to dock on both sides because on the left is power + usb + audio (and sd card on the 13"), on the right there is usb + thunderbolt or mini DisplayPort. Docking on both sides also makes it more sturdy and in this case it also looks good imo.It needs to dock on both sides so the secure lock will work. Just docking on one side will not secure the laptop.
There is a huge difference between licensing and a licensing fee!
What's your point? If they can't make it right because they don't have the money/engineers, are we supposed to buy it just to make them feel better about selling an expensive USB hub?