Good Guidelines for Running a Country:
Test #1: Does your flag involve a skull? If so, you're probably the bad guy.
Test #2: Does your military goose step? If so, you're probably the bad guy.
Test #3: Do you have to make laws to prevent people from leaving your country? If so, you're probably doing something wrong.
Test #4: When people sneak out of your country and INTO China, it's all over.
Looks like Kim Jong Il has three of the four, and now he's calling burgers good food. And no doubt the North Korean state news channel has announced that the Illustrius Leader invented a new kind of food that he will now benevolently share with his people.
Leaving political discussion aside, this is yet another amusing feat of someone who has to be near the top of the truly insane leader list of all time.
The difference between ol' Kim Jong Il and all the other really nasty leaders in recent history--Stalin, Hitler, Sadam Hussein, Pol Pot--is that his policies have the iron fist intended to beat his people into submission (though they're taken to such isolationist extremes that trying to make his miserable pit of a country look flawless internationally and domestically is far more important than the lives of his own people, even when it doesn't make the slightest bit of sense), but he's also got a wild set of bizzare hobbies and personal quirks.
Most dictators are either interested in world domination (Hitler) or having absolute power over their own little quiet corner of the world (Hussein), but Kim Jong Il's desires don't seem to make a whole lot of sense one way or the other.
North Korea would really be the last place on this earth I think I'd choose to live at this particular point in time.
(And by the way, there's nothing really wrong with the fundamental concept of communism--Jesus, after all, recommended it as the right way to do things--but in practice it has failed abysmally every time it's been tried on a large scale with a top-heavy government. I also think it's somewhat misleading to characterize Bush's greed-based politics and a few personal quirks as religious extremism--religious influnce, maybe (though I'd just call it ignorance in the case of the gay marriage ban), but he has a long way to go before extremisim.)