I think they should have done this out the door but I suppose they wanted to test the water first. Specifically it would have been nice to have a higher local capacity.
I dont. If they did that, they would face Apple straight on, at a price point that wouldn't scream "BUY ME". The hardest part of building a platform is always to get initial growth. The "cheap" route seems like a nice way to bootstrap the platform. Once that is done, and people are "in", they can go head to head with Apple. Before that? Not so much.
----------
But we know LTD posted that as an insult to Windows as he thinks Lion is the best thing ever, hence my sarcastic reply.
To me, Lion surely beats Leopard and SL. Then again, i haven't had any real problems with it, and I've taken my time to figure out how to make it usable as well... (for some reason, all great settings seemed to be turned the wrong way by default)