Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iPad? Well, the sad truth is I've forgotten what year i bought my last iPad. And I use it daily. It just works fine for my purposes so I see no reason to replace it.
I still use my original.....really, the first one, iPad in the kitchen to keep recipes on. It works just fine for that and is much more efficient to organize, find, and read than my old recipe books and recipe card holder.
 
Apple hit it out of the park with the M1 MacBooks. No need to upgrade, unless you are still running an Intel MacBook. I replaced my 2017 MBP with a refurb M1 MBA in the Spring of 2022 and imagine I'll go longer than 5 years before I upgrade this time around.
Agreed, although I went from the M1 to the M2 MBA and don't regret it for a second. The M1 (I gave it to my daughter) now feels positively chunky after using this slim beauty.

And I DO notice the difference in screen brightness from the M1.

All that said, it'll be at least ten years (or it's death) before I replace this thing again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chuckeee
Indeed. The main problem Apple now has .... people don't really need to upgrade from M1/M2 to M3. The M1/M2 current machines are good enough for most people and will last fine for more than 5+ years.

This is what is going to hurt M3 the most in my opinion.
Let’s not give Apple any ideas like the M1 was “too good..”

Already noticed FCP performance issues when upgrading my very expensive M1 MacBook Pro 2021 to macOS Sonoma….

There always customers who upgrade because they want the latest and greatest. Probably the majority of users upgrade when they had their Mac for a good number of years to justify the high cost. I would guess that the average Mac consumer replaces or buys a Mac on average 3-5 years. Apple knows this and is why the supported longevity of a Mac version is what it is.

It looks like the “hype” of Apple silicon first response wave is dying down, so probably we can expect a once a year CPU update yearly cycle going forward.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
It will be interesting to see who is correct on the rumor treadmill, Kuo or Gurman.

Each “say” different things about predicting when the 3mn comes out. We will see what happens in October..that should determine who is just “saying” stuff to keep their band going or who has become a has-been.
 
It’s just hard to justify upgrading devices when base storage and base memory doesn’t justify their starting prices.

Start iPad storage at 128GB and MacBooks at 512GB and MacBook Pros at 1TB.

NAND prices have drastically fallen in the last year.
256GB should be base for non pro, 512GB for pro mobile devices.

512GB for non pro and 1TB for pro computing.

And going from 1TB to 2TB shouldn’t be so expensive either.
 
I am in the market for an M3 Mac. My i9 maxed out MBP is getting near the 5~6 year old mark, when I generally upgrade. As well as a M3 iPad Pro. Work gave me an M1 MBP that was a maxed out machine. So that has tided me over…
 
I have a 13" M1 air and like it a lot. I bought it back when the 15" air did not exist and whose design I love. It's a fanless laptop, so I want all of the thermal improvements that will come with the M3. So I will be one of the folks that will upgrade the minute they come out.

But for most people, I just don't see them getting excited over like 10-15% performance in terms of shelling out thousands for a new machine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
I imagine demand luxury tech sales will continue to fall off. With the corpse-in-chief we have in the US signing policies that have worsened inflation, worsened the cost of living, much like many other countries poor policy makers, the world is struggling to recover economically.
All data from respectable sources suggest inflation has steadied in the US without a whiff of a recession, and the economic recovery and rebalancing both in the US and in several developed economies are progressing fine.
 
Customers do not give a flying crap about 5nm vs 3nm etc. These specs are for geeks.
And they shouldn't, as it most likely will make either no difference, or so little a difference as to be moot!!!

I'm a geek, but I don't even care about that. I see a lot of people that seem to care around here, but I'm a different kind of geek I guess.
 
All data from respectable sources suggest inflation has steadied in the US without a whiff of a recession, and the economic recovery and rebalancing both in the US and in several developed economies are progressing fine.

Consumer debt isn’t looking too great too me. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CCLACBW027SBOG

Neither does personal savings rate

Nor rent for primary residence in urban areas

Make no mistake, people are getting squeezed left and right. You may be technically right that inflation is cooling and recession is being avoided, but the data doesn’t fully capture what’s actually going on. We are teetering on the brink in many ways.
 
  • Like
Reactions: macsforme
Just trying to educate myself and showing my ignorance:
Is single core speed more important than amount of RAM? For some reason, I thought RAM was the key to reduce audio mixing latency nowadays.
The OS is the biggest impediment to reducing latency. MacOS has all sorts of things going on all the time. That's why Sonoma has a game mode, but I don't even think that would be good enough for audio mixing.

To get latency as close to 0 as you can, you either need a realtime OS (marginal), or dedicated hardware that does nothing else.
 
So Kuo is just saying next year’s feature bumps aren’t as desirable as last year’s? Well, color me surprised… a lot of the switchers attracted by “cool, quiet, fast, long battery life” have switched, and now they’re all set to enjoy their devices for a few years.
 
~30% drop in revenue... I wonder if they forecasted it, or if we can expect to see heavy M2 device discounts at the end of the year.

I'll bet there's a glut of underwhelming base models out there.
 
Just trying to educate myself and showing my ignorance:
Is single core speed more important than amount of RAM? For some reason, I thought RAM was the key to reduce audio mixing latency nowadays.
Hey there, good question! Ram is important for mixing large projects, but single core speed is what matters for reducing latency during real-time recording. Many will argue to use direct monitoring, but to free a person up from a racks worth of gear, I prefer to use software plug-ins. Plus, I find that inspiration and creative choices can come from using EFX, so I don’t like to turn them off, such as singing dry with direct monitoring.

As far as RAM, I had 64 GB on my 2019 i9 Intel, and it stunk. Using a M1 Air, however, with 16gb was amazing. I’ve found that 24 GB of RAM works like a charm for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chuckeee
All data from respectable sources suggest inflation has steadied in the US without a whiff of a recession, and the economic recovery and rebalancing both in the US and in several developed economies are progressing fine.
Except every other REAL way of measuring economic recovery is absolutely in the gutter. Americans are way worse off now and the longer we continue what we’re doing the worse it gets. Gas is still over double what it was 3 years ago (pre-COVID), groceries are at least 50% more expensive, rent is nearly double, mortgages and interest rates are astronomical compared to pre-COVID. That all amounts to people feeling less comfortable spending money on luxury items. The policies made by current administration in the US are indefensible. They clearly haven’t worked. Forget the disastrous border policy, Ukraine policy etc, it all amounts to people feeling less comfortable buying new things, so maybe they keep their phone longer, laptop longer, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: persuasiveghost
Look at net incomes. Stagnating. People can't afford to just buy fancy stuff or things too expensive. This is why more budget friendly stuff like iPhone SE, Mac mini or iMac are exactly the right thing to do and keep in the Apple portfolio.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
I have a maxed out M1 MacBook Pro 16", cost like $7k. I'm not gonna upgrade it for another 10 years when things actually physically break.
I didn't go quite that far, but I finally replaced my Mid 2012 15" cMBP with a M2Max (lower tier) 64GB RAM, and 2TB 16" back in January. I wanted 4TB, but just wasn't willing to spend that much. I only skipped the M1 gen because I generally like to wait one gen after huge changes for big problems to be sorted, but the M1 range ended up being pretty solid. I'm hoping to keep this new MBP for at least 6 years, would prefer to get another 10 out of it like I did my old one.
 
It can't be any worse, assuming the M3s receive a paltry improvement over the M2, like the A17 Pro did over the A16.
M2 is based on the same core architecture as the A15, not A16. A16 was a one off on 4 nm, Macs will jump from 5 to 3, skipping it entirely.

M3 will be either based on A17 or on a different new design made specifically for N3E.

~20% would be a realistic but conservative estimate.
 
Look at net incomes. Stagnating. People can't afford to just buy fancy stuff or things too expensive. This is why more budget friendly stuff like iPhone SE, Mac mini or iMac are exactly the right thing to do and keep in the Apple portfolio.
It's not even about can or can't.

Macs and iPads have always had longer upgrade cycles for most people. They don't even have actual cycles, they just get used until they develop issues or get noticeably slow.

It's going to take years until M1 devices start feeling slow, especially for casual users, which is probably most M1 MacBook Air and almost all iPad customers.

Honestly, even for a lot of professional users M1 is plenty fast, the 8 GB of RAM are far more of a concern here than actual processing power.
 
Well for me, Apples determination to keep the base spec of everything right on the edge of useful for most users and then max out the cost of EVERY single option to upgrade them is not just a cynical exercise, its an active disincentive to upgrade from that point forward. Once you've pulled the pin and gone through that frustrating exercise, where you know you are being milked for every dollar you've got, you become that more determined to hang on to your new purchase and get the most possible use from it before you even think of upgrading to a new device again. I have to think its a case of making an extra dollar today and losing two dollars Apple could have made tomorrow because their pricing model takes you out of the upgrade cycle for longer.

Well said.
They have removed me totally.

I use a Hack and buy my phones and iPads preowned, where someone else took a bath on it
 
I would argue that certain design decisions and quality issues have diminished the overall value proposition for Mac laptops versus the past. I owned a 2021 MacBook Pro (14", M1 Pro) for about a year before ultimately selling it and reverting to my older Apple machines. The primary factor was that I experienced moderate to severe eye strain with it (I am not generally an eye strain sufferer, but after extensive research the issue seems to be the display panel backlights or GPU driver issues such as harsh/aggressive temporal dithering). There are many similar reports about people suffering eye strain from modern Apple products including MacBooks, iPhones, iPads, etc.

There are a plethora of other concerns about modern MacBooks, such as cracking display flex cables (YouTuber Hugh Jeffreys did a video touching on this I believe, and the only remedy appears to be a full display assembly replacement, which you can't even do yourself without desoldering/resoldering an IC from the board), the soldered-on/non-upgradeable storage, the gimmicky oversized display notch, the fact that you can't even power it off to clean it (it basically turns back on whenever you touch it), etc. Then, at the end of the day, you will have minimal support for extending the life of the machine by running alternative operating systems once Apple no longer provides system updates, as all components are proprietary and driver support must be reverse-engineered (thankfully, the Asahi Linux team is working on this).

Apple products used to be known for their premium quality, longevity, and high degree of polish/refinement. Unfortunately, customer trust is difficult to earn and easy to lose, especially when your customer wastes several thousand dollars and spends months dealing with vision illness from using your products.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CloudsNeverDie
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.