Amazing lossless is much better quality I don’t care about virtual surround spacial audio I want higher quality audio
People are nuts for thinking there’s a massive and noticeable difference from 256kbps or 320kbps and up -Yes, there is an audible difference if you are listening on top of the line speakers or headphones. But not on small headsets.
The real, important difference is heard when going from 96kbps to 128kbps, 128 to 192, 192 to 256, etc.
I’ve seen several blind tests done with audio experts and most of them can’t even tell the difference, and those that can need a lot of time to decide what is lossless and what is not.
Lossless audio not supported on the $550 AirPods Max.
I'd rather bet on UWB:Lossless cannot happen under bluetooth. This will probably be only available via wifi.
This sentence doesn’t make any sense.
I would expect Apple is developing their own competitor to Qualcomm’s aptX Lossless to provide the required features over the Bluetooth connection.
I'd rather bet on UWB:
The chip is Apple-designed (which they seem to prefer as of late), and it would enable better localization, lower latency, and lower power consumption.
I don't know about chip size(which one is bigger), also I think not everybody would like to have a WiFi transmitter attached to the ear.
Which isn’t fully lossless.I would expect Apple is developing their own competitor to Qualcomm’s aptX Lossless
There is no law of nature saying it can’t happen, but it’s been difficult to push lossless compression that far, at least.Lossless cannot happen under bluetooth. This will probably be only available via wifi.
Flac and aptX are separate encodings. AptX isn’t fully lossless at Bluetooth bandwidth.FLAC can be streamed over Bluetooth using aptx compression.
Which isn’t fully lossless.
There is no law of nature saying it can’t happen, but it’s been difficult to push lossless compression that far, at least.
Flac and aptX are separate encodings. AptX isn’t fully lossless at Bluetooth bandwidth.
Well to be fair I’ve had the AirPods since they first came out. Then moved onto the AirPods 2 and then pros. I’d not lost a case or AirPods up until the AirTags came out. However I have anxiety that I will lose the case so I’ve attached an airtag to my AirPods Pro case but I would find this new feature really helpful.I haven't lost my Airpod case yet, but have misplaced a few buds that fall out and scoot in strange places, and lost one riding my bicycle outside once. I find the 'find my iPhone' sound so hard to triangulate very often. It seems to be the right frequency to bounce off walls and make finding it just a little more difficult, and frustrating. Are other people experiencing that? So an Airpod case that has that capability sounds less a good idea, and more an offer for frustration, and those ports getting clogged with debris, and potentially swamped with sweat, water, moisture...
I wonder if this is an obfuscation provided by Apple? Putting a speaker in the case doesn't make much sense, to me. *shrug*
We will see...
Does that case actually stick to the back of iPhones? I believe the polarity of the magnets is the same so they wouldn’t work together, it should only stick to MagSafe chargers, therefore reverse wireless charging wouldn’t work.I was really surprised when they actually updated the charging case to support MagSafe, but didn’t add any other features. My only guess would be iOS 16 supporting reverse MagSafe charging from iPhone to AirPods. God forbid they added Qi reverse wireless charging for older AirPods and non-Apple devices.
But yeah, they better add a sound-emitting case with U1.
The current Find My capabilities are basically useless and hardly work. I often get notifications that I left my AirPods behind when they’re actually still with me.