The shorter the stems, the lower mics quality is. And that's why AirPods record better audio than AirPods Pro. Without stem, these will sound even worse to whoever is on the other side of a phone call.
I hope they don't remove the stem. It's perfect for music controls, much better than that "tapping", which works 50% of the time.
Actually, I prefer to use the ‘stem’ as a gripping method to adjust them in my ear versus touching the earbuds themselves. So yes, I agree with what you said, but I use the stems as more of an adjustment method in addition.
^^^ These. All great points about keeping the stems. I hope the removal aspects of the rumors aren't true. I think they'd be quite hard to deal with and handle w/o the stems. I also think the stems help anchor them in people's ears, as they already don't stay well for some people (I inherited mine after my wife gave up on them. Never thought I could stand in-ear type earbuds, but the Transparency mode solves most of my 'pressure' issues, surprisingly.)
I don't think most could tell the difference between reasonably high bitrate compressed and lossless anyway, even with the highest end of headphones. It is more a marketing thing (which seems to be working!).Everyone is talking about the technical limitations of lossless via Bluetooth, but here's the thing: AirPods are tiny. You are not going to notice the difference in sound quality with them.
If we were discussing high-end wired headphones or IEMs, sure. AirPods weren't designed with serious listening in mind. They trade sound quality for convenience and portability.
Marco Arment has covered this quite a bit on episodes of ATP podcast. Apparently, the difference most people hear has more to do with the prevalence of remastering often involved when creating the lossless versions.