Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
People, websites, youtubers post their own interpretation of the cost to produce an iphone without any real knowledge of what the cost is to Apple. Because that is the holy grail of information and then it can be used to bak into the numbers of iphones sold.

Not so fast, those wet fingers in the air are to be taken as seriously as Marcus Welby diagnosing a real life patient.
so much misinformation on youtube and here it's not funny.
If you believe Pei comments with youtube BS view, it's no wonder people are as confused as they are. Just like podcast and youtube self believing real fact loudmouths...... there are hundreds of thousands of these ad-driven misinformation lowlives. I ignore most.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
It makes you wonder, had Apple gone with a different body style for the current SE, would there have been a higher demand and potentially an SE in 2024 (or later)?

I actually think the SE was a going to be a problem because the phones have advanced beyond what an SE price point can support. There are multiple cameras, better screen technologies, wireless charging, etc. These things cost money, and modifying current designs (i.e. removing a camera module from a 12 mini to make it a cheaper SE) is costly.

I just don’t think Apple has been making phones that can use the same hardware, take on a new chipset, and still sell for $429.

Not to mention that an iPhone XR body with iPhone 16 chip would probably heavily impact iPhone 16 sales.
 
It would be nice if the SE had a bigger screen. My mom basically wants an iPhone to be a dumb phone as she gets older so the new SE would be perfect, except she's so used to a bigger screen that the iPhone 6 style screen is too small. She was using an iPhone X but was having touchscreen issues so needed to get a new one.

All the other newer iPhones are too expensive for her when she just wants basic functions. SE was the right price and she would have bought one otherwise. In the end she decided to get an actual dumb phone, which has an even smaller screen and old fashioned keypad, but the allure of going back to simpler times in her twilight years was too much to resist when a normal sized iPhone would cost her well over $1000 AUD.

Ya I think Apple should update the SE into the iPhone 8 Plus body. It would still look old enough that it wouldn’t cut into the sales of Apple’s more expensive offerings, while at the same time providing more incentive to SE users.

I think keeping the same design for three upgrades in a row was a bit too much. Should have done the upgrade into the 8 Plus body in 2022.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ac1d 8urn
The problem with the 13 mini, which was created by the 12 mini, was battery life not the price, if it did 7 plus hours, I would buy for $675 without a second thought. You are right about the 14 plus, it's very poor value against the 14 Pro Max
The funny thing is the 12/13 minis have longer battery life than the SE or the earlier 8, people just started expecting more battery life in recent phones.
 
  • Like
Reactions: one more
Why does Apple keep starting and stopping iPhone models and changing sizes? Get it together, Apple! Keep it consistent and stop upsetting fans of particular sizes! And give us a true one-handed phone again!
I’m angry.
 
False. There are a handful of people who pretend to want Touch ID on the internet. In the real world, Touch ID is less valuable than Face ID, and is perceived as such.
You must have really big hands.

Face ID is sufficient but the ridiculous number of gestures it takes to substitute for the Home button is the real problem. The Home button makes it simple to use and for many of us, that's enough. Besides, we don't want a 6.1 inch display. 4.7 inches of display is good, 5.1 inches without much of a bezel would be better for aesthetics, as long as Touch ID is available.
 
The Mini was not discontinued, you can still buy a brand new 13 mini straight from Apple for the exact same price as it was on its launch day.
It never got lowered in price,
??? I’m pretty sure the 13 Mini started at $699 ($729 without carrier discount) and is now $599.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mkoesel
It would be nice if the SE had a bigger screen. My mom basically wants an iPhone to be a dumb phone as she gets older so the new SE would be perfect, except she's so used to a bigger screen that the iPhone 6 style screen is too small. She was using an iPhone X but was having touchscreen issues so needed to get a new one.

All the other newer iPhones are too expensive for her when she just wants basic functions. SE was the right price and she would have bought one otherwise. In the end she decided to get an actual dumb phone, which has an even smaller screen and old fashioned keypad, but the allure of going back to simpler times in her twilight years was too much to resist when a normal sized iPhone would cost her well over $1000 AUD.

What about picking up iPhone 11? Good old 6.1” LCD screen, great battery and not so expensive nowadays.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JapanApple
What's the iPhone SE? The iPhone SE 1 was an attempt by Apple to use up their existing small screen displays. The SE 2 followed in the footsteps of the SE 1. The SE 3 was just a cash grab. I don't expect another SE 4 for about 5 years.
 
What about picking up iPhone 11? Good old 6.1” LCD screen, great battery and not so expensive nowadays.
The phone is way too big; I think part of the appeal of the SE has been that it’s a smaller phone that appeals to those with smaller hands and older folk not caring to have an entertainment powerhouse in their phone.
 
The current SE sports an A15 in it. That's what passes for a high-end SoC still and is what the iPhone 14 comes with as well.

I bet the current product does the job fine so the plan will be to just continue selling it for a longer while.
 
I’m 40 and I don’t play games or take photos.

I just want a phone, email, social media apps and the SE fits the bill perfect.

My parents have the SE which suits them because they just want iMessage to speak to kids and grandkids etc and to receive photos from family etc.

I
And, the Home Button has been around since 2007. Lots of people have no interest in learning a new way to control their phone. My wife tested my iPhone 13 and thought FaceID was ok, but the constant swiping to control the phone was very cumbersome (and I agree!). The home button is a very clear and pedagogical way of controlling the phone, the swiping on all-screen-iPhones doesn't feel as natural (perhaps yet).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ac1d 8urn
They've already added 5G to the SE and raised the price along with it.

If they've cancelled a 2024 refresh of the SE (which is still pretty far out), I bet this has something to do with the switch to USB-C. Apple is going to introduce the iPhone 15 line with USB-C next year, but they aren't going to run around and redesign all of their old iPhones that they still sell to include USB-C. That also rules out reusing an old product design for an updated SE (which they are so found of doing). By 2024, any SE would have to be an entire new design with USB-C...something Apple has proven unwillingly to do for a low cost iPhone. It may well be that the SE we have today will remain until a USB-C iPhone trickles down to the SE.
So the first USB-C iPhone SE will have to based on the iPhone 15 (non-Pro model). Now the question is how long will it take before they can sell one at close to $400 and still be happy with the margins? 2026? 2027?
 
It's not that simple with the phone. Aspects of SOC will be designed with USB-C in mind.
I don’t think it would be a major challenge for Apple since an individual already accomplished it. It’s possible some other component is to blame, like the A17 or more specifically, availability of the A17 in early 2024. Now, you’ll probably say what about the A16? Well, it’s possible Apple doesn’t want to use the A16 because it’s significantly more expensive than the A15 and it wasn’t really Apple’s original intention to use the 4nm (really 5nm) processor at all as they wanted to go straight to TSMC’s more advanced 3nm processor for the 14 Pro/14 Pro Max. It may not even be used in the iPhone 15.
 
The logic board is easy. The whole package is not. Rearranging a board is not redesigning an entire phone, which is what is required for a major change like USB-C.
It’s not redesigning the entire phone. Just the frame and the socket already used in iphone 15 by then.

U remember the article about a student integrating USBC in an iphone X?
When selling millions the cost of that change is peanuts.
 
I’ve just sold my iPhone 12 Pro Max and just gone back to my old SE from 2020 that I had as a spare and I love it! Felt small at first but after a day you get use to it and the best bit of all is the Touch ID! It’s so much better than Face ID.. shame they’ve cancelled a new model as it’s fantastic
If you don’t mind me asking, what was the reason to the change?
And also, don’t you miss the battery, camera and screen quality?
Sorry for my questions, but I’m just curious😊
I’m currently rocking a 12 PM and I would have a hard time to go to a SE, even the 2022.
 
Yeah, that iPhone 14 Plus is selling like GANGBUSTERS

Much more likely that Apple can't get it's margin numbers high enough anymore, so better FOR THEM to scrap it. I mean, who cares about the grannies and younger kids. Perhaps they can eat cake, instead.
Yes, grannies and younger kids don’t matter, I agree. They don’t need an iPhone and if they’re getting one they can use the somewhat larger SE. granny will be dead soon and children do not matter WHATSOEVER until they turn 18. They are a detriment on society until then.

I like how you take the “let them eat cake” approach to a marginally smaller premium smartphone. Tell me more about your first world problems and what a hard life you have.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: JapanApple
Its my belief that the underlying problem is Apple’s absolute refusal to make anything less than a near double profit margin on their devices. I don’t know what the margin is on the current SE, but I know Apple makes about 100% margin on the flagship lineup.

Look at what Google, Samsung, and others offer at $400-$450. It’s absolutely mental just how good those devices are for the price.

And then look at Apple’s $430 offering. I reckon Apple isn’t willing to do a new SE (even with a four year old design, the XR) because they can’t hit the margins they want.

For the record, I say this as a happy owner of the 2022 SE (small phones ftw).
Yeah, as the smartphone market matures & the competition are increasingly making very good full screen phones with modern features in the $400-500 bracket, apple’s profit margin at the lower end will have to give.

Only Apple knows how well the 5g SE is doing, but I’d expect not well.

Gone the days I suspect, where the Apple brand name allowed them to market a 6-8 year old design.

For 2024, I think they have 3 credible options:

SE Plus 5G - based on the iPhone 8 Plus (with USB-C)
Quite a few people here on this forum would love this, but I suspect that launching a new version of a design that debuted 10 years ago would not go down well.

XR SE 5G - based on the XR (with USB-C)
Probably the most sensible option at this point for a cheaper to make full screen phone.

You’d have to imagine that a redesign similar to the 14 for easier repairability would be needed too.

The other big issue would be if a 60hz LCD screen will cut it at the lower end when so many android phones are OLED 90hz (even if some of their screens are a bit iffy).

However, if replacement screens and repair costs are cheap / easy that could be a major selling point.

Could Apple be shooting itself in the foot by offering a full screen for a cheaper price? Not really, as you’d be getting a form factor that was ‘good/ok’ in 2018.

SE Mini - based on the 13 mini (with one camera lens and USB-C)
The only major issue here would be if people want a cheaper smaller phone or a cheaper bigger phone. Given the amount of cheap big screen android phones - where 6.1 inches is seen as ‘small’ - this would likely be a risky proposition. Plus the chassis interior would likely need to be redesigned to be more like the 14. Oh and Apple would probably have very thin margins on this phone.
 
I've been using touch id for a decade at least now, I prefer the size of the SE/mini's and I could adapt to face id if I had to as I do quite like the all screen display but the main issue for me is I don't get on with OLED screens and the SE 2022 is the only LCD option available.
 
The 14 Plus isn't doing well, because it's too close price wise to the Pro Max, considering the huge differences, people are just buying Max if they want a large phone for a $200 odd more
This. It’s not a matter of dimensions, but price. iPhone 14 and 14 Plus should be at least $100 cheaper than they actually are.
 
I heard it from the CEO of Nothing, Carl Pei, in this video:

I’m assuming (?) he got his info from some of the reports that came out about the cost. If you Google “iPhone 14 cost to produce” you’ll see a number of articles about it. I believe the initial report came from Nikkei Asia.

Here’s one article that covers it: https://www.investopedia.com/financial-edge/0912/the-cost-of-making-an-iphone.aspx
Carl Pei blatantly lied several time in the past… the “flagship killer” 😆
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.