Probably keep the same RRP but a lower build cost means more profit as that's literally all they care about then they have the cheek to wonder why sales are tanking.Sounds like Apple is cutting corners on quality this year.
Probably keep the same RRP but a lower build cost means more profit as that's literally all they care about then they have the cheek to wonder why sales are tanking.Sounds like Apple is cutting corners on quality this year.
It should be that way, but unfortunately as history proved, Apple has exerted a really poor quality control over Mac and iPhone displays over the years.Do you not think that Apple has a clear standard that any partner has to meet? Do you think they will accept anything less than their spec? Supply dependence on anyone from anywhere is not wise. I don’t think depending on displays from Samsung is smart considering they are a strong competitor in the same categories.
I’m over these yearly releases with little to no innovation. (That goes for all cell phone makers not just apple) I’ll upgrade maybe every 3-4 years from here on out.
and blame it on inflation etcApple will still increase phone prices nonetheless.
Your comparison is off.
Korean LCD display panels were on par/superior to Japanese ones almost from the start,whereas Chinese never been superior to Korean panels not even on par as of now.
Apple is doing this simply to cut costs/increase profit.
But that's what they are doing - they've learnt from the Koreans how to make OLEDs to a high stanadard (as evidenced by BOE passing Apple's validation tests) and will now look to out-compete the Koreans on price. The Koreans will probably still keep an edge on new technologies like QD-OLED and QNED but as OLED becomes mainstream expect it to go more and more to Chinese manufacturers over the next 5 years or so.Yes, because they proved themselves, let's get back on this in 15-20 years and see if BOE is better than Samsung, because right now, it's not and I wouldn't want displays from them in my calculator not to mention my very expensive phone.
And that nonsense that China will produce everything and will excel in everything is proving to be a complete BS already. They are good at manufacturing stuff other nations designed and developed but not designing and developing their own products.
Korea (namely LG display and Samsung display which btw are different than LG Electronics/Samsung Electronics) quickly overtook Japanese LCD panel technology.The way I recall it is that Korea very quickly got on par with Japan and then undercut them on price to the point where Sony had to first go into a JV with Samsung and then just buy the panels from Samsung. The Japanese vendors outperformed the Korean vendors on the finished product due to their chipset integration, motion handling etc, but the underlying panels achieved parity very quickly. Chinese vendors (and BOE) have been making OLED panels for years - it's just now that they have passed Apple's validation.
iPhone 15 Pro range will still be Samsung only.I used to say „wait for iP15+USB-C will be best iPhone ever“, but now after reading this „Get the iP14Pro while you can, will be the last good iPhone!“, heh.
Probably for more profit margin to satisfy Wall Street. There's a good chance they use the less expensive BOE panels, you know the savings won't be passed down to the consumer.Moving to more dependence on China seems very short sighted. Hopefully this is just a negotiating tactic to get better pricing from the other options.
Surprised Apple is going to keep the iPhone Plus model around when Kuo said days ago that Apple was looking to reevaluate the iPhone 15 lineup due to poor iPhone 14 Plus sales.Apple has placed orders with display supplier BOE for the iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Plus for the second half of 2023, with the supplier potentially overtaking Samsung as the iPhone's largest display provider by 2024.
Apple is reportedly "seriously" concerned over the sales performance of the iPhone 14 Plus, the 6.7-inch non-Pro variant of the iPhone 14 lineup. As a result, it is considering ways to restrategize its iPhone lineup for next year.
The post outlines two possible strategies reportedly under consideration at Apple, with the first being to further differentiate the pro and non-pro iPhones, which was previously rumored by Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo. Secondly, Apple is considering reducing the price of the Plus model of the lineup, which starts at $899, according to the post, which cites supply chain and industry sources. A price reduction of the Plus model means the standard iPhone, which starts at $799, could also see a price decrease unless Apple wants to shrink the pricing gap between the two models.
BOE had once met Apple's quality standards (after several failures), but then they made a change to their design (to lower their manufacturing costs?) without informing Apple. When Apple found out, BOE got cut as a supplier.Do you not think that Apple has a clear standard that any partner has to meet? Do you think they will accept anything less than their spec? Supply dependence on anyone from anywhere is not wise. I don’t think depending on displays from Samsung is smart considering they are a strong competitor in the same categories.
Nevertheless, BOE is unlikely to be excluded from Apple's OLED panel supply chain going forward because its presence puts pressure on Samsung Display and LG Display to be more competitive and cut prices.
While this may be true, there is a key difference here.It's funny - I remember around 15-20 years ago forums were filled with this kind of comment around TVs and not wanting a TV with a trash "Korean" panel when the Japanese panels were so much better. BOE (and any other Chinese supplier) will need to pass Apple's QC and specifications and the future for the mainstream is likely going to be Chinese displays.
Specs can drop if you want to lower prices to boost sales of sluggish products like the iPhone 14.Do you not think that Apple has a clear standard that any partner has to meet? Do you think they will accept anything less than their spec? Supply dependence on anyone from anywhere is not wise. I don’t think depending on displays from Samsung is smart considering they are a strong competitor in the same categories.