Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Anker already has a pretty good lineup of such chargers and they are likely considerably cheaper than an Apple-branded one would be. We'll see if this one turns out to be true I guess.
 
Nice so since removing the charger from the box like 2 years ago we'll have 3 new chargers? (18w 20w and now this?) each time there's some incompatibility with accessories and stuff with fast charging.

Maybe they'll start a charger upgrade program soon to go along with iPhone lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: DeepIn2U
Anker is already working GaN type two devices which will be even smaller. It's my understanding from the "decoder" podcast they have some patents in place on this technology that will allow them to stay a year to two ahead of the competition.
 
Apple may replace the existing 20W USB-C power supply with this new 30W GaN one that should be just as small and portable but useful to power/fast-charge a wider range of low power devices.
 
Didn't Anker kinda do this all ready like two years ago?
Yeah I had the Anker 30 watt PD1 for a few years now. Mine has stopped working correctly, however. It starts charging then stops for no reason. Bit of a letdown. I have since bought the 65 watt pod charger though and it is currently working, it's basically a little larger than the Apple 20 watt charger but has 65 watts of power, enough for laptops.
 
LOL this thing is such a POS, Apple should be ashamed. I've been using Anker's cheaper, smaller and all around better plugs for a couple years now. Didn't even bother to unwrap the plugs that came with my 2021 iPad Pro or M1 MBA. I charge both with the same 30w Anker plug, and my iPhone 13 with a 20w Anker plug.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NightFlight

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2022-03-07 at 1.51.32 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2022-03-07 at 1.51.32 PM.png
    1.5 MB · Views: 69
Anker already has a pretty good lineup of such chargers and they are likely considerably cheaper than an Apple-branded one would be. We'll see if this one turns out to be true I guess.
Anker doesn't make a GaN travel charger.... Looks like Apple isn't either in this case
 
I mean it's great that Apple is doing this, but as others have said, Anker already makes these with multiple ports and it's likely significantly cheaper than Apple's. I've never had a problem with Anker's products.
 
Most likely still won't be smaller than Anker Nano II 45W - the best & smallest "serious power" I've had so far. Also not sure why Apple packs just 30W charger with Macbook Air M1, when it's able to use ~45W for faster charging.
 
Really wish they would bring back the 12W iPad adapter or MacBook charger design with the detachable duck head. I hate not being able to attach my 6 ft extensions to my 18W adapters.
 
Which will probably be $10 more.

More smoke and mirrors from Apple.

They say: “we’re ditching USB chargers for the environment.”

They mean: “we’ve made the boxes smaller to save on shipping costs. You have to spend an extra $20 on a USBC charger because all your old ones are USBA. Oh, and we’ve not knocked $20 off the cost of the phone.”
 
With the 16-inch MBP’s that provides 140W.

Last year with the 140W GaN changer they made for the 16 inch MBP. It was one of the first USB-C chargers that could output more than 100W from a single port.

definition:
Gallium nitride, or GaN, is a material that's starting to be used for semiconductors in chargers. It was used to make LEDs starting in the '90s, and it's also a popular material for solar cell arrays on satellites. The main thing about GaN when it comes to chargers is that it produces less heat. Less heat means components can be closer together, so a charger can be smaller than ever before—while maintaining all the power capabilities and safety standards.


Neither Apple‘s 140W,


Nor the 96W charges on their product page states either is a GAN charger.


edit:

links to


links to


without a subscription to the final link not once is there a proper confirmation by Apple in print stating either is a GAN charger just a statement that 1 source confirmed yet said source is not linked to show from the horses mouth. I have issue with this type of reporting.
 
Are you certain with proof that it is a GAN charger?
From a link here on MacRumors
As well as its use of the USB-C PD 3.1 standard, Apple also confirmed that the brick is its first gallium nitride (GaN) charger, which means it’s using the material that allows companies to build higher-powered chargers that are smaller in size than their traditional counterparts.

Have I torn one open to prove it? Nope, but there are folks on the internet that have, not hard to find.
 
  • Like
Reactions: szw-mapple fan
definition:



Neither Apple‘s 140W,


Nor the 96W charges on their product page states either is a GAN charger.
I literally typed “Apple GAN Charger” into Google and got the result from here at MacRumors. I didn’t think that “knowing what to type into the search field” was that much of a “skill” per se, but perhaps it is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: szw-mapple fan
From a link here on MacRumors


Have I torn one open to prove it? Nope, but there are folks on the internet that have, not hard to find.
See my latest post.

nothing specific in that above link I posted that just before you did.
it's mentions someone else stated Apple confirmed, no actual confirmation directly from Apple.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.