I still trust Mark Gurman. That’s about it.after what happen with today event i would not listed too any more leaks about up comeing stuff
I still trust Mark Gurman. That’s about it.after what happen with today event i would not listed too any more leaks about up comeing stuff
Mark Gurman is the legend.I still trust Mark Gurman. That’s about it.
I know that - they are a consumer company.That consumer crap what makes Apple billions of dollars every quarter. 💰 🍎
$100+ billion dollar in revenue. That is what Apple and Tim Cook is chasing.
View attachment 1789065
If anything, the fact that they’ve put so much work into AR features that are so rarely used leads me to believe they have another use in mind for it.It’s not because it doesn’t exist. There is absolutely zero consumer interest in this product category. If there was another company like Samsung would have launched some sort of buggy alpha-type deal to try to get the lead on Apple (See: Galaxy Gear) but they haven’t.
AR has some fantastic applications in an industrial setting but Apple do not make industrial devices: they make consumer technology.
Honestly, when was the last time any of us user AR on our iPhones?
I could see that. But that's not what "launch" typically means. "Announce in WWDC, launch in Q4" would be more plausible.presented next year at WWDC with release date 6 months later
Agree. We are still not there in terms of battery and processing technology. It is not possible to make thin and light AR headset integrated into normal glasses frame, which is the only type of product that could be appealing to average consumer. Google tried some years ago with Google Glass and found that these are not feasible for the general public. I'm yet to find anyone wearing Google Glass in the wild. When you google "AR headset" you only find news about companies shutting down and renders of ridiculously big and heavy prototypes that probably will never be released. As for VR headsets, these are currently good only for gaming and watching porn. Apple is not in neither of these two businesses.It’s not because it doesn’t exist. There is absolutely zero consumer interest in this product category. If there was another company like Samsung would have launched some sort of buggy alpha-type deal to try to get the lead on Apple (See: Galaxy Gear) but they haven’t.
AR has some fantastic applications in an industrial setting but Apple do not make industrial devices: they make consumer technology.
Honestly, when was the last time any of us user AR on our iPhones?
Did Kuo really predict new MacBook Pros too? I know Jon Prosser definitely did, but I genuinely did not know that Kuo also added weight to that rumorHe already predicted new hardware to launch yesterday
When became the smartphone really popular by consumers, before the introduction of the iPhone?It’s not because it doesn’t exist. There is absolutely zero consumer interest in this product category. If there was another company like Samsung would have launched some sort of buggy alpha-type deal to try to get the lead on Apple (See: Galaxy Gear) but they haven’t.
AR has some fantastic applications in an industrial setting but Apple do not make industrial devices: they make consumer technology.
Honestly, when was the last time any of us user AR on our iPhones?
Kuo intel comes from supply sources. Apple can place large order for a specific component and release the actual product a half a year later. So there could be always timing mismatch. Apple's orders within the supply chain are usually quite significant and always leave some traces, which is exactly what Kuo is using for his predictions. This is different from some youtubers who claim to have a guy or gal in Apple Park giving them hints and leaks. No sufficiently high-ranking apple employee with access to new product releases will risk his 6 figures annual salary and destroying his/her professional career in Silicon Vally in order to earn what? A couple of thousand dollars from a random fat youtuber? And a respectful youtuber would not risk getting sued by Apple, and potentially getting banned from youtube for participating in criminal bribery activity. Easy as that. For me, the only reliable leaks are the ones we get from supply sources and those coming from random sources immediately before events (last 24 hours). Everything else is in 99% of the cases pure speculation based on guessing.Kuo is a bot Too much of his spam lately…especially about the new hardware that was launched yesterday
They’re going to launch a brand new platform before WWDC?
I call BS.
It's more plausible that the AR headset is announced at WWDC next year and it'll launch 6-12 months later.
True, but you're missing the point. Announcing it is NOT the same as launching it.I mean WWDC is in the second quarter….
What a co-inky-dink.It's just occurred to me.... you know what we haven't heard about for months? That damned CAR.
Not sure about it.It’s not because it doesn’t exist. There is absolutely zero consumer interest in this product category. If there was another company like Samsung would have launched some sort of buggy alpha-type deal to try to get the lead on Apple (See: Galaxy Gear) but they haven’t.
AR has some fantastic applications in an industrial setting but Apple do not make industrial devices: they make consumer technology.
Honestly, when was the last time any of us user AR on our iPhones?
The rumored headset is basically a VR headset with some form of video passthrough. I agree that good AR with semitransparent lenses is not feasible, based on publicly available information. Google Glass was not AR.Agree. We are still not there in terms of battery and processing technology. It is not possible to make thin and light AR headset integrated into normal glasses frame, which is the only type of product that could be appealing to average consumer. Google tried some years ago with Google Glass and found that these are not feasible for the general public. I'm yet to find anyone wearing Google Glass in the wild. When you google "AR headset" you only find news about companies shutting down and renders of ridiculously big and heavy prototypes that probably will never be released. As for VR headsets, these are currently good only for gaming and watching porn. Apple is not in neither of these two businesses.
Google Glass is AR, not VR. VR headset are useful in very very narrower cases. Yeah, there is an initial wow effect when you first try Oculus Quest or similar high-end VR device, but after few hours playing, it is usually put aside collecting dust. And it is not like we haven't tried. These VR headset have been around for what? 10 years maybe? We have already tried some form in implementation in all these use cases you mention and the fact is that it is not a game charger by any stretch of the imagination. I think Apple should take a completely different approach towards AR and VR in general.The rumored headset is basically a VR headset with some form of video passthrough. I agree that good AR with semitransparent lenses is not feasible, based on publicly available information. Google Glass was not AR.
There are definitely other Apple-approved uses for VR besides games. Art and music apps, social apps, virtual movie theaters. Just being able to have a virtual multi-monitor setup anywhere would be useful.
Google Glass is not AR or VR. It's not AR because the content it shows do not line up with anything in the real world, or adjust based on the rotation or position of the user. It's more like just mounting an Apple Watch a foot in front of your face, like one of those biker mirrors that attach to a helmet.Google Glass is AR, not VR. VR headset are useful in very very narrower cases. Yeah, there is an initial wow effect when you first try Oculus Quest or similar high-end VR device, but after few hours playing, it is usually put aside collecting dust. And it is not like we haven't tried. These VR headset have been around for what? 10 years maybe? We have already tried some form in implementation in all these use cases you mention and the fact is that it is not a game charger by any stretch of the imagination. I think Apple should take a completely different approach towards AR and VR in general.