My guess is that the iPad Air will transition to miniLED when the iPad Pro transitions to microLED... that seems a lot more likely IMO...
LG Display makes WRGB displays for TVs. Samsung makes RGB displays for phones. RGB is considered superior due to the fact that the white sub pixel in WRGB displays dilute color saturation at high brightness. It’s only used to get more brightness. However with their evo panels it’s less of an issue.LOL. Mini-LED is just marketing for FALD with more zones, but it is still an LCD display. I would generally take an OLED over any LCD technology, but now I wonder. Will the iPad Air use LG's RGB OLED technology, which is essentially red, blue and green filters (like in an LCD) back-lit by red, blue and green OLEDs (which, combined, produce white backlighting), or is it going to be using Samsung's Super-AMOLED tech, which we have in iPhones and which relies on a less sharp pentile arrangement? I can see how mini-LED could be marginally better on a larger (and lower PPI, vs iPhone) screen than pentile.
Yeah tbh it seems like it’ll be pretty much the same form factor with the display being the main tent pole feature. Would definitely like to see different materials used aside from aluminum which would be cool. They gotta be cooking up something on that front.So regardless of the screen type, am I right in thinking that rumours of the last week or so seem to suggest we shouldn't expect a massive change in terms of design from the 2021 iPad Pros? For a short time there I thought we were maybe going to see significant changes to the form factor and features to differentiate it from the Air, but maybe the screen tech is going to be the main thing.
It’s good to see many educated people here with regards to screen technology. Like them I’m wondering how OLED is the low tier. If it’s true, its backwards. MiniLED does not offer the same performance. Go look at the recent TVs with the tech. Blacks and blooming are terrible compared to OLED. I predict Apple will artificially limit the brightness of the OLED and call it inferior. As if brightness is the only important factor in a screen. This is troubling if true.
Obligatory reminder that the "organic" in OLED has nothing to do with "organic" in the sense of "from organisms" or "biological". The LEDs are organic in the sense as they are made with organic chemistry.They say follow the science, so I'll point out something scientific. OLED is organic and has a predetermined life cycle. That means the chemicals decay and die out eventually. I'll bet mini-LED and LCDs outlast OLED in any form.
IF that was the case Samsung would use it in their TVs, but they don't because for larger panels its not as good.
It is confusing. Yet the Apples XDR screen is a miniLED. If OLED was so superior, why did Apple not use it for their flagship display?
Rumours long time ago suggested 10,000 LED zones for the portables and not the puny 500 used in the XDR.
Well the amount of dimming zones need to be the same as the amount of pixels for it to be equal to OLED in contrast and deep blacks department.Mini LED is superior to OLED, it’s pretty obvious.
With enough dimming zones, mini LED offers essentially infinite contrast. It is also brighter than OLED. Color accuracy is also superior. The only downside as Kuo has reported is that mini LED is more expensive than OLED.
If you think OLED is better, you haven’t been paying attention. The current TVs aren’t representative of what the best mini LED can do nor what Apple wants from manufacturers.
Well the amount of dimming zones need to be the same as the amount of pixels for it to be equal to OLED in contrast and deep blacks department.
Mini-LED offers other advantages of course. Many of which matters more for a mobile device, I wouldn’t take mini-LED over OLED for movies though.
Samsung would use it if it could - LG won't sell Samsung OLED panels.IF that was the case Samsung would use it in their TVs, but they don't because for larger panels its not as good.