You can get the same effect with different cameras that are close together but have a very different depth of field. If you throw in LIDAR, you can likely get away with only one camera.Well as I understand it there need to be quite some space between the two lenses in order for a VR (spatial) camera to work. Look at all the VR cameras that already exists. I think the iPhone lenses are too close to each other to create a proper 3D effect.
Curious how will the LIDAR help this would be cool if so then I can use my iphone to take pictures and Vision Pro for what I want to do with the geology outcrops and such I envision doing stereo for.You can get the same effect with different cameras that are close together but have a very different depth of field. If you throw in LIDAR, you can likely get away with only one camera.
Your phone has a phone app that many people don’t use.Why should those of us who will not get the headset have to pay for a chip in an iPhone that we will ever use?
External hard drive access, for one.It makes me wonder what additional features related to the headset that chip will enable…
Many people who are still concerned about their health, and the health of others, still wear masks. It's possible to include both Touch ID and Face ID in the same device and give users a choice. Let's quit making excuses for Tim Cook's mediocrity.faceID is vastly superior to TouchID. Not sure why anyone would want it back. I have never once since iPhone X and every model since had an issue being recognized. It just works. Except when we started wearing masks which has been fixed and is done anyway.
It’s possible but it’s an unnecessary complication to an already expensive device for a very small segment of the population.Many people who are still concerned about their health, and the health of others, still wear masks. It's possible to include both Touch ID and Face ID in the same device and give users a choice. Let's quit making excuses for Tim Cook's mediocrity.
I was a big Touch ID fan, until I changed to Face ID.faceID is vastly superior to TouchID. Not sure why anyone would want it back. I have never once since iPhone X and every model since had an issue being recognized. It just works. Except when we started wearing masks which has been fixed and is done anyway.
They're likely waiting for the tech to improve or material cost to go down.Apple never adopts new wifi standards. They always wait 2-4 years.
It’s been 3 years since 6E went mainstream and we still don’t have a 6E iPhone. I think it could be another 3 iPhones until we see 7.
I say this entire report stinks.
You will need two iPhones and a Belkin accessory to join them together.I think future iPhones (and perhaps even iPads) will be able to take spatial photos and videos for Vision. They showed a user taking them with Vision Pro but I’ll bet that won’t be the only way.
We’ve got a bunch of iPhones used for testing at work and the OLED ones have the homscreen icons burned in. It’s not normal usage mind; we tend to have screen lock times either very generous or disabled.They're likely waiting for the tech to improve or material cost to go down.
IIRC AMOLED displays came out as early as 2008(?) but it took Apple nearly a decade to adopt it.
I have yet to hear of any recall for the 1st iPhone X over AMOLED burn-in.
I hope anyone seeing this has a reading comprehension level higher than a hamster.We’ve got a bunch of iPhones used for testing at work and the OLED ones have the homscreen icons burned in. It’s not normal usage mind; we tend to have screen lock times either very generous or disabled.
To produce spatial photos on an iPhone, you’d need to add a camera module at the bottom of the phone, because you need as much distance between cameras as you can get. Doing this with an iPad would be even better, as there would be more space between cameras, allowing for more of a dimensional image.I think future iPhones (and perhaps even iPads) will be able to take spatial photos and videos for Vision. They showed a user taking them with Vision Pro but I’ll bet that won’t be the only way.
Until you get to the chunk it’s in. Then you’ve only got 5 minutes until it despawns.Cool, so when I loose my phone, I can walk trough the city with my vision pro and have 2 hours to find it 😎
Well, those trillions don't grow on trees.So I guess this effectively just added £1000+ to the cost of the Vision Pro, though I suppose prospective buyers would also likely be annual iPhone upgraders anyway.
The display on my X is doing fine after five and a half years.They're likely waiting for the tech to improve or material cost to go down.
IIRC AMOLED displays came out as early as 2008(?) but it took Apple nearly a decade to adopt it.
I have yet to hear of any recall for the 1st iPhone X over AMOLED burn-in.
And maybe the 15 Pro as well if the periscope camera is required as some people here have speculated and the periscope camera is exclusive to the 15 Pro Max.Wow! Vision Pro already making iPhone 14 and older obsolete.
This is in contrast of the 2015 Google Nexus 6P I got and experienced burn-in within 12 months.The display on my X is doing fine after five and a half years.
Apple never adopts new wifi standards. They always wait 2-4 years.
faceID is vastly superior to TouchID. Not sure why anyone would want it back. I have never once since iPhone X and every model since had an issue being recognized. It just works. Except when we started wearing masks which has been fixed and is done anyway.
LiDAR gives you range data for each point on the image. It might not be down to the pixel level, but it is a Z map. If you take several pictures of the same object from different angles and you know where the camera is for each of the images, you can even build a decent 3d model of the object.Curious how will the LIDAR help this would be cool if so then I can use my iphone to take pictures and Vision Pro for what I want to do with the geology outcrops and such I envision doing stereo for.