Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
How clever to take something out of context so you can mock it.

The context was: the cost reduction from using Apple silicon instead of Intel allows Apple to use the more expensive micro LED displays.

Stick to acting, Sir Anthony.

That's utterly irrelevant. The sentence about using Apple Silicon remains unnecessary and obvious. That paragraph could just start with the next sentence and make as much, if not more, sense as it currently does.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IG88
Really, Apple skipped numerous Intel Chip updates. The only machines that could not realistically be upgraded every year was the Mac Pro.
Do realize that even when Intel actually released the chip, sometimes they were not actually in volume. Even in Windows PC side, often times it took months for the OEMs to be able to actually ship in volume. Maybe Apple cannot deal with that kind of uncertainty.

Besides, the performance improvements between recent Intel generations are hardly a big deal. This is why AMD easily trounced Intel nowadays. Intel actually had not done any significant improvements on their chips for the last few generations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BKDad
I don't care so much about the weight than the cost. I still use a 2013 MBP. It is powerful enough for me and the M1 in the current Air would be all I need. But I like a bigger display but doesn't need to be a Pro machine that can be used for 4K video editing. Just Word, Browser, Zotero and Mail.
Yup. It would be nice if Apple do a 15" Air. Not everyone who wanted larger screens need a Pro performance. But Apple seems to equate larger screens to Pro premium price (iPad Pro 12.9, iPhone Pro Max, MacBook Pro, etc). :(
 
Intel was a factor, but AS doesn't guarantee regular yearly iPhone like refreshes. The iPad Pro lineup might be a better example, which usually gets refreshed at slightly over 12, but less than 18 month intervals (meaning there will be the odd year like 2019 where you won't see anything).
You're probably right. And it wouldn't be a big deal Imo as computers are now akin to TVs, people no longer upgrade them that often.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Falhófnir
Yup. It would be nice if Apple do a 15" Air. Not everyone who wanted larger screens need a Pro performance. But Apple seems to equate larger screens to Pro premium price (iPad Pro 12.9, iPhone Pro Max, MacBook Pro, etc). :(
It is a shame their lineup is set up in this way, particularly as the 15/16" MBPs have really inflated in price over the last decade or so, necessitating a major investment into a powerful workstation whose power will sit idle for office tasks.
 
All these reports and yet nobody seems to be able to identify a timeframe more specific than “2H 2021” for the new MBPs, still! :(

Worse yet the iMac is always “later this year.” How much later?
I think because that one guy is out already, the leakages are being tightened out now.
Who knows, usually everything would be out in the open a day/days prior to the keynote, so we'll see.
 
The sentence about using Apple Silicon remains unnecessary and obvious. That paragraph could just start with the next sentence and make as much, if not more, sense as it currently does.
Correct. Some of these articles need better editing.
 
How clever to take something out of context so you can mock it.

The context was: the cost reduction from using Apple silicon instead of Intel allows Apple to use the more expensive micro LED displays.

Stick to acting, Sir Anthony.
Still makes no sense there, Skippy. The 2020 MBA uses Apple silicon. Where is the cost reduction from Apple Silicon to Apple Silicon?
 
Apple really should make it habit to update EVERY Mac model YEARLY, just like back in the Steve Jobs days. It's ridiculous that we are now consistently waiting a couple of years for Mac updates for the past ~5-6 years. Just look at any Mac model and the slow pace is stupid. 16" MacBook Pro? Last update was in 2019. iMac? It's been around a year now. Mac Pro? 2019 again. And now MacBook Air is gonna be 2 years away from an update, not to mention it was so neglected in the 2016-18 era.
I think it really comes down to human resources being stretched thin and coordinating the projects to develop a new model. Its not necessarily like there is a separate MacBook Pro, iPad, iMac iPhone teams; Apple might give that impression in their presentations. But, I believe, when the team finishes one project like say the iPhone 12 and iPad Air, they then start full work on the next.

Its why I wasn't surprised the M1 Mac was using the same 5 year old design. Its not because they are holding back, but the work to engineer something differentiated, while functional and adding value, takes a lot of work. Also, the big issue, can we manufacture this at scale, sensitivity to the market its being sold to, material cost, testing the chemicals used, coordinating with the suppliers and different manufacturers in Asia, the process to actually either make a different color sku. Thats a lot of work even for company the size of Apple. Also, there is always the elephant in the room, which is the next iPhone. There is likely a golden rule in the company, don't affect that train at all cost. If iMac has to be delayed, if new iPads have to be delayed, so be it.
 
Right? As opposed to what? Going back to using Intel silicon?

"The laptop will also feature the Apple logo on the upper lid, according to Kuo"
*shuts notebook lid

"Whelp. There's no prize for 2nd place on the internet, and first is clearly taken."

*goes home
 
What exactly is "extreme mobility?" XD

Weight isn't an issue for those who would rather have a pro laptop rather than a wafer-thin pastiche of one. Capability matters more than design.
It appears that user wants a laptop with a large screen, not necessarily a "pro" laptop.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ModusOperandi
What exactly is "extreme mobility?" XD

Weight isn't an issue for those who would rather have a pro laptop rather than a wafer-thin pastiche of one. Capability matters more than design.
"Extreme mobility" is the MacBook Air when it was released. But that was more than 10 years ago. By now, 15inch MacBook Airs are technically feasible with the same weight as the 2010 MBA. But they preferred to keep the MBA with a small display, so that dumb customers understand the price (MBA low cost because small display, MBP high price because bigger display --yes, that's dumb, but that's the way dumb costumers buy).

Now you are telling me "you want a pro laptop if you want a big display". No, sorry but no: I have a 2018 15inch MBP, and I miss (a lot) my older MBA low weight. I don't need the MBP performance. I only need the display. The MBA performance is just more than adequate for me.

I just want a 15inch display at 1.23kilograms (can be done, as shown by LG: yes, call it "plastic", bendable, or whatever, but of course materials need to be light if you want a huge display with almost no weight).
 
  • Like
Reactions: ModusOperandi
Is the Mini LED model supposed to be the same as the colorful redesign in late 2021/early 2022?

Or is it redesign late this year/early next, and then another update for Mini LED later in 2022?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.