Price for the new display?
Probably $1,999 ...
That sounds about right but being Apple $2499 wouldn't be too shocking.
Price for the new display?
Probably $1,999 ...
Geeze. Relax, if you get this worked up with rumors, I’d hate to see what gets ur panties in a wad in real life.Fuuuuuuuuuuuuu....
Seriously Kuo, I was really counting on the MBP to be the one correct rumour for this year
I agree, I too have been waiting since 2009 for Apple to make a better Mac Pro.Man, I hope at WWDC we will finally have the Mac Pro and this 31" 6K display. This wait is painful.
Apple favored the 16:10 aspect ratio for their Cinema Displays until the they released the 27” LED Cinema Display and the 27” Thunderbolt Display. I suspect they will stick with the 16:9 aspect ratio, although 16:10 is a slim possibility. That being said, I would estimate that the native resolution of a rumored Apple’s 6K Cinema Display would be 6144x3456, which is 1.5x the resolution of the current 21.5” 4K iMac’s display. At the rumored 31.5” display size, it also works out to be 223 DPI, which is consistent with Apple’s philosophy on what qualifies as “Retina” for the Desktop.
The cost will probably be between $1999 and $2499, but could get as high as $2999. Remember the old 30” Apple Cinema Display debuted at an eye-watering $3299 (for the times) in June of 2004. If it includes any “new and ground breaking” display technologies (120Hz Pro Motion, HDR support, expanded beyond P3 color gamut) expect it to hit $2499-$2999. Hopefully Apple will also add a Thunderbolt hub in there as well (USB-C ports, 10Gb Ethernet port, 85w charging).
Hopefully, Apple will also release similarly spec’ed 4K 22” and 5K 27” displays at $999 and $1499 to give users a choice for their 2019 iMac, 2018 Mac mini, 2018 MacBook Air and 2018 MacBook Pro...and, maybe, the 2017 iMac Pro, but do not bet the farm on it.
That sounds good to me. I’m probably one of the few who’d actually like a 17” laptop. Powerful like a desktop but still portable. Perfect combo for me![]()
You know what would be cool? A 2015 MacBook Pro, but modernize the internals (CPU, RAM, FSB, etc.), and change the TB2 to USB-C/TB3. That's it. Don't change the chassis, keyboard, or anything else. It's fine.
yes, I don't need a 31.5 or even a 27 monitor, a 22 is enough for me, I hope they release multiple sizes not that big and expensive thing of 31.5.
The 13” MacBook Pro is probably Apples best selling Mac by a country mile. For such a move to work, Apple would need to significantly reduce the cost to build and price points of the 15” model.
This is actually super important. Hopefully more info is coming soon.In a previous research note, Kuo predicted that Apple would launch both a 31.6-inch display and a 16-16.5" MacBook Pro in 2019, so it's not entirely clear if the 15-17" MacBook refers to a separate notebook or if Kuo now believes the 16-16.5" MacBook Pro is coming a few years later than he originally expected.
Geeze. Relax, if you get this worked up with rumors, I’d hate to see what gets ur panties in a wad in real life.
[doublepost=1554817517][/doublepost]
Whats the difference between 1 and 0? The ability to clean the fans with compressed air?
I just want a 15 inch MacBook Air.
Yep, it's rough.I agree, I too have been waiting since 2009 for Apple to make a better Mac Pro.
I've given up though, as when it does eventually arrive you just know it's design will still be unfit for purpose and it'll be priced too high too which will harm sales and thus fulfil Apple's belief that their customers don't want a flagship Mac - which of course is utter nonsense.
They just don't want a flagship product that's spiralling in cost (being 30% more than it used to be) and dwindling in functionality.
In 2005 Apple's flagship quad core G5 tower was $1999.00
In 2006 the first Mac Pro was $500 more at $2499 and by 2013 the trashcan Mac Pro began at $2999 - that's an increase of $1000 for a flagship Mac in just 8 years.
Compare this to an iMac which is nearly 20% less. It was $1299 in 2005 and just $1099 by 2013.
Apple have to get their head out of their arses and put a halt to the escalating costs and diminishing functionality of ALL their computers.
I've had money burning my pockets eager to go into Apple's for almost a decade now, but they have managed to make their newer items a sideways step at best and a backward step at worst on nearly every model they make from iMacs to MacBook Pro's to Mac Pro's - and don't get me started on the Mac Mini!!!!
Apple have shown time & time again that they simply will not revert to releasing products that people actually want so there is no longer value in owning them.
I've always been happy to pay a bit of a premium for a Mac, but Apple have pushed the boundaries on this to the extreme over the last decade or so and they are no longer good value which they were in the past.
So I've stopped caring now as even if they announced a perfect Mac Pro tomorrow it's likely it'd be beyond my means anyway.
That's without factoring a screen which we all know will be far more to purchase than it should too and going by Apple's recent history will probably have 'issues'.
So yes Apple have done the unthinkable and turned an avid supporter of their product into an 'old fan'.
It's like loving the Music of Depeche Mode up until 1996. Then Alan Wilder leaves and their music is just not as good, but unlike Apple Depeche Mode don't charge 30% more for it too!
If Apple can pull this off, that bodes well for the industry
OLED looks great on Laptops and PC monitors, superior to LCDs today (not in gaming though), but has not been widely adopted yet for multiple reasons outside of price...its just not practical at that scale because of the issues that burn in can bring productivity users. Its not like a phone where you are turning on and off your screen hundreds of times per day and on a small scale where software can make micro adjustments. It's different when its always on, 24/7 in some cases.
I hope Apple releases this monitor this year...I also hope its not too prohibitive in price but no doubt anything with new tech like this, it will be
micro LED has incredible potential.
This rumor has nothing to do with OLED or micro LED, it’s about the type of backlighting Apple will be using for their LCD panels.Man as a display geek, I just can't wait for that 6k screen!
It'll be physically bigger than than the 5k, and have more real estate in terms of scaled resolution, as well as at least similar sharpness to the 5k!
And the icing on the cake... Micro led should give us OLED like picture quality!
This guy throws crap against the wall and sees what sticks.
After reading the Wikipedia article on Quantum Dot technology, I am wondering if MiniLED will help to increase the actual color gamut that this rumored 6K Cinema Display monitor can display and move Apple past DCI P3 and over to Rec. 2020/2100. Maybe that’s realistic, maybe it isn’t. Maybe Mini LED will make this possible or maybe I am all wet.People MiniLED is not MicroLED...think of something similar to quantum dot displays...just another LCD IPS display with enhanced brightness, smaller LEDs, contrast and more local dimming....
https://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/article/645696/microled-vs-mini-led-what-difference/
I just want a 15 inch MacBook Air.