In the future, we just buy the license to 3D print Apple products ourselves.
you…dont…say…There’s a huge difference between using an industrial metal 3D printer and a Ultimaker printing plastic as a hobby.
And Apple can charge literally an arm and a leg for it. I can feel it.In the future, we just buy the license to 3D print Apple products ourselves.
I’m thinking they got that one wrong and it’s prototyped parts they 3D printed. You don’t 3D print parts for Apple scale production.What I don't understand is:
1. It takes them 12 hours to make a piston. Obviously watch parts will take less time, but depositing all of those layers is going to be time consuming.
2. With the pistons they're talking about almost 1 off parts. How do you make millions of watch parts? That many large printing machines seems like they would fill the factory ...
Stunning.
You only had to buy a separate one if you didn’t already have like 8 in a drawer (like most of us) lol. So yes, it did help the environment, massively.Oh man I’m not really sure how I feel about this. Can’t imagine a 3D-printed iPhone for example. And no one knows for sure how durable would it be.
And oh, to reduce costs huh ? This for sure doesn’t apply to us customers.
Like come on, they have already used the “we’re protecting the environment” argument as to why they removed the power adapter from the iPhone boxes, which indeed saved them lots of costs, but instead forced us customers to buy it separately.
Tim Apple is getting more greedy it seems like.
Yes, but still there was no reason to remove it in the first place. Like why would they remove the power adapter but not the cable if it was for that reason ? What's the point of offering me a new cable and then expecting me to use an old adapter with it or buy a new one separately ? How is that protecting the environment ?You only had to buy a separate one if you didn’t already have like 8 in a drawer (like most of us) lol. So yes, it did help the environment, massively.
Not sure how I feel about this
Most 4th and 5th gen military aircraft use sintered and vacuum moulded titanium. Apple will use processes that are probably higher tolerance than those. It’ll work just fine.Oh man I’m not really sure how I feel about this. Can’t imagine a 3D-printed iPhone for example. And no one knows for sure how durable would it be.
And oh, to reduce costs huh ? This for sure doesn’t apply to us customers.
Like come on, they have already used the “we’re protecting the environment” argument as to why they removed the power adapter from the iPhone boxes, which indeed saved them lots of costs, but instead forced us customers to buy it separately.
Tim Apple is getting more greedy it seems like.
3D printed Ti is used extensively in fast jet production, an arena where quality and reliability take on a rather higher priority than the Apple Watch Ultra.so lower quality? CNC Machining seems the way to go for higher quality.
Only if you don’t understand the process.It just feels so antithetical to Apple’s design sensibilities.
There’s a huge difference between using an industrial metal 3D printer and a Ultimaker printing plastic as a hobby.
That’s why it’s called the alpine band. It’s not intended to get soaked.unless there is only 1 change (like from S7 -> S8 with the cycle temperature tracking) then ill pick up as as ill still get a good resale price for my current ultra.
im more excited about the new straps they may be releasing as well. I liked the orange colour strap but wish they had made it in the rubber instead. not a fan of the material straps which when wet will stay soggy for hours.
@constantsnags!Most 4th and 5th gen military aircraft use sintered and vacuum moulded titanium. Apple will use processes that are probably higher tolerance than those. It’ll work just fine.
I suspect that if they have chosen to use this method, it’ll be focused on in the reveal and they’ll talk about just how high quality it allows components to be, and how much less wasteful.@constantsnags!
That’d be great if so. Honestly, I don’t know much about industrial 3D printing so I wasn’t really sure. But all I’m hoping is that it stays as strong and durable, especially since the Apple Watch Ultra is marketed more as a rugged watch for tasks like climbing mountains and swimming. So making it even more durable sounds great.
You only had to buy a separate one if you didn’t already have like 8 in a drawer (like most of us) lol. So yes, it did help the envoronmentOh man I’m not really sure how I feel about this. Can’t imagine a 3D-printed iPhone for example. And no one knows for sure how durable would it be.
And oh, to reduce costs huh ? This for sure doesn’t apply to us customers.
Like come on, they have already used the “we’re protecting the environment” argument as to why they removed the power adapter from the iPhone boxes, which indeed saved them lots of costs, but instead forced us customers to buy it separately.
Tim Apple is getting more greedy it seems like.
Because including power adapters for every iPhone manufactured is pointless, as users end up with superfluous adapters. That’s a waste of resources and ends up contributing to e waste. Manufacturing anything contributes to the degradation of the environment. So manufacturing less things, like adapters, helps. Maybe after one or two generations of USB-C iPhones they’ll stop including cables too, as by then we’ll all have several and won’t need more.Yes, but still there was no reason to remove it in the first place. Like why would they remove the power adapter but not the cable if it was for that reason ? What's the point of offering me a new cable and then expecting me to use an old adapter with it or buy a new one separately ? How is that protecting the environment ?
And why does that only apply to iPhones ? iPads and MacBooks still come with the power adapter in the box, so why just the iPhones ? They could've just done the same thing with them using the same argument.
And now Samsung and some other Android manufacturers are doing the exact same thing with their phones, so I don't really think this was all done just for the "environment" as they claim. I bet in the future they'll probably remove the cables too for the same argument.
Apple Watch Ultra 2040:
Apple just sends you the watch plans and your print out your watch on your 3D printer that is next to your Kurieg
I agree. Though the problem is that chargers are prone to getting damaged overtime, so at one point, you’ll eventually have to buy a new charger and throw away all the old (and possibly) damaged ones. Plus they still sell the adapters separately and some people still buy them, so I don’t really see how is that any different from including them in the box other than making people pay more for the charger.Because including power adapters for every iPhone manufactured is pointless, as users end up with superfluous adapters. That’s a waste of resources and ends up contributing to e waste. Manufacturing anything contributes to the degradation of the environment. So manufacturing less things, like adapters, helps. Maybe after one or two generations of USB-C iPhones they’ll stop including cables too, as by then we’ll all have several and won’t need more.
I don’t disagree that Apple benefits too. However, they have to balance the needs of the many against the needs of the few. Those who have to buy a new adapter when they buy a new iPhone are numerically far less than those who don’t. So while some may feel an extra pinch, on balance it’s more beneficial than including them for every device sold and having to deal with the environmental risks that come with that. I’ve heard some ideas like “give them away for free when buying a new device” but that won’t help, as everyone would take it because it’s free. I don’t know a good solve… maybe a small discount when you have to buy a new one? Not so big that everyone takes advantage, but enough to be helpful?I agree. Though the problem is that chargers are prone to getting damaged overtime, so at one point, you’ll eventually have to buy a new charger and throw away all the old (and possibly) damaged ones. Plus they still sell the adapters separately and some people still buy them, so I don’t really see how is that any different from including them in the box other than making people pay more for the charger.
And keep in mind that not all people upgrade their phones every year or two. So if I’m gonna upgrade from my 5-year-old iPhone for example, there’s a possible chance that my old charger is probably damaged. So in that case (or for whatever reason) I’ll just have to buy a new one since it doesn’t come in the box.
And let’s not pretend that this is not actually saving them costs. In fact, they’ll end up making more money off those who end up buying the charger separately for whatever reason. It’s just kinda sad that you pay +1000$ for a phone and then it doesn’t come with the original adapter in the box (which is an essential thing).. and possibly the cable in the future too.
They’re probably right about the “saving resources” thing, though I’m just not so convinced by it. It seems kinda fishy to me, and I feel like they only did it to save costs and make more money off people.
People dislike him because he’s a clown.Apple always reducing costs, increasing profit margin and following that up with an increase in price for the products.
Don't worry, fan boys here only hate Elon Musk though.
Didn't Apple claim to save the planet by removing the Power Adaptor then charging you $20 to buy one? Oh wait, no thats okay. How dare Elon charge $9 a month to those that want a blue check mark?! Something that isn't even needed or required to use Twitter effectively unlike a power adaptor.
It’s never going to happen. This is a pointless line of discussion.And Apple can charge literally an arm and a leg for it. I can feel it.