I think they were too.I was merely trying to be funny - my opinion is that life can be short. Stuff like iphones or headphones we might use quite a bit so I lean towards buying the best tech you can - as long as it’s not straining the budget to much
Because they suck compared to the simplicity of tap? Ever try squeeze controlling while doing anything but sitting still? You end up pulling the thing out of your ear. All kinds of fun while jogging, riding a bike or anything physical. This is why I have the Pro’s for air travel, coffee shop listening etc and the Gen 2’s for literally everything else. Is this expensively redundant? You betcha. It’s also completely necessary because of the functionally useless squeeze controls.Just curious - why wouldn’t you want squeezable stems over touch based ones? In my experience, I find the squeezable stems noticeably more precise (tactile feedback and actual press) + the added benefit of being able to use them with gloves in the winter.![]()
If the max could fit comfortably in your ears I’d be worried!Glad to hear this. Only the airpods fit comfortably in my ears. I tried the pros and the max but no luck.
Technically it isn't 🤣In other news water is wet.
Sounds like that will be next yearSo, no new AirPods Pro this year?
Apple won’t let him, they feed him controlled leaks and tell him when to leak stuff.Looking forward to it and cannot wait. 2 more days.
Mr. Kuo: Can you do your magic and release the whole event already, please?
The better fit really depends on your ears. There's been mixed results.I need airpods for my gym sessions where I run on the treadmill and do lie down on declined benches or where my head position moves a lot (eg doing cable rope crunches). Would normal airpods be ok for this, or would they not stay in the ears and would it thus be better to go for airpods Pro?
You are right buuut they can add health features to compensate the high price.they absolutely can't price the AirPods 3 any higher than the current price of AirPods 2, it would be insanity. already you have an APPLE PRODUCT in the Beats Studio Buds that are much smaller, fit bitter (than even AirPods Pro), have active noise reduction, transparency mode, and sound better but cost $149... I don't know how Apple is going to sell a stemmed AirPod with no active noise reduction, no transparency etc. for $199 let alone even more. I suspect the AirPods 2 at $149 (no wireless case option any longer), AirPods 3 at $199 (overpriced to the extreme based on rumored features), and AirPods Pro at $249 (dated design, overpriced, the bud version of the AirPod Pro 2 next year will be worthy of this price again.)
They should add health features only to the Pro model. Just like the Series vs. SE watch strategy.You are right buuut they can add health features to compensate the high price.
Not if you freeze it, then it is a solid. Checkmate.
My prediction:
AirPods Pro - $249
AirPods (3) with Wireless Charging Case - $199
AirPods (2) with Charging Case - $129
If they drop the current one to $129, it will be a good way to capture entry-level consumers.
agreed if they drop air pods 2 to £99 that would be smart
Not if you freeze it, then it is a solid. Checkmate.
I think a good way to test the fit is using the normal corded EarPods that used to come with iPhones... the AirPods are basically identical as far as shape, except for being wireless. The lack of a cord actually makes them more stable in the ear IMHO.I need airpods for my gym sessions where I run on the treadmill and do lie down on declined benches or where my head position moves a lot (eg doing cable rope crunches). Would normal airpods be ok for this, or would they not stay in the ears and would it thus be better to go for airpods Pro?