Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Refreshed M1 MBP in 2021 and MBA in 2022 timeline seems logical. Going forward, M1 MACs will see lot more converters from other platforms especially Windows. At some point, Microsoft will port ARM Windows to run natively on M1 MACs than Apps will be optimized on it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amartinez1660
I've been doing the all iPad thing for awhile now, but with these new Apple Silicon Macs, I'm temped to go back to a MacBook of some kind.
In my experience the iPad Pro is amazing as an standalone consumption device, as light standalone work powerhouse or the perfect companion to anything Mac...

I use the iPad almost exclusively when out of work.

However, I have a workstation iMac connected to 3 other screens, useful and useless gadgets and what-gives, however since discovering that taking a screenshot on the Mac allows to annotate it on the iPad so magically seamlessly, like, really: cmd-shift-4, grab a portion of the screen, it appears on the iPad to be annotated with the pencil (as long as it’s sidecar-ed) I ALWAYS now have the iPad also with the workstation.

An M1 MacBook and an iPad are perfect companions me thinks.
 
my personal theory is that apple will wait until 2022 to release a compact MacBook because they need to workout the keyboard in the previous 12 inch MacBook and redesign. it will be a 12.5 or 12.9 inch MacBook and the Air will get dropped. it will be 2 lb and will have an M2, 8 core. The current air is as thick as my 16 inch MacBook Pro on the top end and weighs as much as the 13 pro. there is no need for the Air. its too fat and and heavy for what it is supposed to be. the new 13 MacBook will have a regular LCD and will see for $999 or $899 and will be the best choice for travel and students cue to cost and compact size. Also everyone loves that MacBook just like they loved the iPhone SE 1. due to the release of iPhone mini I feel Apple is listening to what people want and before 2017, apple was releasing the 12 inch yearly. The new M chips are ideal because the point of the 12 inch was to be fanless and portable and the 13 Air isnt all that portable. This is why ill wait until Apple gives me the laptop I want. then ill keep it til its dead because its not for editing 10 bit raw videos anyways. come on apple. roll out the 2 lb MacBook 12.9" for $899. I'll pre-order same day of announcement.

I just don't see any circumstances that would lead Apple to remove the MacBook Air from their lineup. It's a great computer, it's heritage is beloved, and it sits at a perfect price point for the masses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ModusOperandi
Tim Cook might preview the new redesign base model of 16.4-inch Macbook Pro.

D06B9F90-C999-4293-A6C0-EB48D2F787A2.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Lemon Olive
Dear Apple, please scrap the TouchBar on the next MacBook Pro redesign.

From: Everyone
Maybe, just maybe, they’ll replace the touch bar with an iPhone X sized track pad that allows you to switch from track pad to touch pad icons.

Asus is doing this and it actually seemed logical.
 
Maybe, just maybe, they’ll replace the touch bar with an iPhone X sized track pad that allows you to switch from track pad to touch pad icons.

Asus is doing this and it actually seemed logical.
Going touchscreen seems more logical to me, though I like touchbar concept instead. This question messes with a lot of different users needs and software UI, specially for longtime, muscle memory trained users. Only option is to have it all and then you choose what to use, but I guess this will be hard to implement on software level in a clean and easy apprehensive way, not to mention cost wise.
 
Technically agree, but Let’s hope they also promote, and allure developers into Metal, as without Metal optimization in pro software, I presume things will not get better for pro users...also hopping, without much faith, I must confess, for discrete graphics.
You're not "hoping for discrete graphics". You're hoping for good graphics performance. You don't care (nor should you care) how it gets done.
 
There you go moving that bar again. You'll see.

I'm not moving the bar. I didn't set it to where they were not going to eliminate some along the way. So this isn't a big "change" from my position at all. Nor have I 'moved the bar" in some sense that iGPU are necessarily limited to always being slower than dGPUs. However,

There is exceedingly little evidence though that Apple wants to put in multiple, broad range of Metal family targets into Metal. There are zero dGPUs supported now in macOS 11. Not even Apple's GPU. Apple is out to be "king of iGPU" implementing. That's nice and will lead to a decrease in the number of dGPU they buy. But that has some inherent limits on scaling. Folks who throw 8-10 billion more transistors at the problem than Apple does have a pretty good chance of going faster on a decent variety of workloads. ( especially in the generalized computational space. )

The top 500 supercomputers in the world (https://top500.org/lists/top500/list/2020/11/) . in the top 50 how many pure shared memory systems in that list? None. ( probably none in the whole list but don't feel like walking through the whole thing to verify.)

And dGPU also doesn't necessarily mean can't cut down on the amount of copying.



Apple has been lame on covering those elemnts from OpenCL 2+ for years and following the base infrastructure that is in the lastest bleeeding edge dGPU packages. That doesn't mean it isn't out there. Just means that under the narrow subset of limited macOS drivers they have an edge. That's lack of doing the work. not hardware.



Sure If Apple remains slack and behind the curve on implementing PCI-e v4 , v5 , 6 ( and CCIX and/or CXL ) they will paint Macs into a corner where Apple iGPU is the only solution, but that isn't necessary nor absent of being dubious on Apple's part.

Does Apple have a better iGPU in the wings. Sure. Is Apple going to whip AMD MI100 and Nvidia's A100 implementations in a computational drag race over the next two years, probably not. Is Apple going to whip a pair of those in a system over the next three years.... even more probably not.
 
I'm not moving the bar. I didn't set it to where they were not going to eliminate some along the way. So this isn't a big "change" from my position at all. Nor have I 'moved the bar" in some sense that iGPU are necessarily limited to always being slower than dGPUs. However,

There is exceedingly little evidence though that Apple wants to put in multiple, broad range of Metal family targets into Metal. There are zero dGPUs supported now in macOS 11. Not even Apple's GPU. Apple is out to be "king of iGPU" implementing. That's nice and will lead to a decrease in the number of dGPU they buy. But that has some inherent limits on scaling. Folks who throw 8-10 billion more transistors at the problem than Apple does have a pretty good chance of going faster on a decent variety of workloads. ( especially in the generalized computational space. )

The top 500 supercomputers in the world (https://top500.org/lists/top500/list/2020/11/) . in the top 50 how many pure shared memory systems in that list? None. ( probably none in the whole list but don't feel like walking through the whole thing to verify.)

And dGPU also doesn't necessarily mean can't cut down on the amount of copying.



Apple has been lame on covering those elemnts from OpenCL 2+ for years and following the base infrastructure that is in the lastest bleeeding edge dGPU packages. That doesn't mean it isn't out there. Just means that under the narrow subset of limited macOS drivers they have an edge. That's lack of doing the work. not hardware.



Sure If Apple remains slack and behind the curve on implementing PCI-e v4 , v5 , 6 ( and CCIX and/or CXL ) they will paint Macs into a corner where Apple iGPU is the only solution, but that isn't necessary nor absent of being dubious on Apple's part.

Does Apple have a better iGPU in the wings. Sure. Is Apple going to whip AMD MI100 and Nvidia's A100 implementations in a computational drag race over the next two years, probably not. Is Apple going to whip a pair of those in a system over the next three years.... even more probably not.
Good grief.

Do you understand why Apple is moving to Apple Silicon?
 
Those functions can be achieved on-screen. Pro users from what I hear by and large seem to prefer F-keys. It would be behoove Apple to offer a pro option to remove it.
Honestly, how much "Pro" work does one do without an external keyboard and monitor these days? I thought I would hate the Touch Bar, but honestly don't even notice it (especially on the newer MBPs with the real ESC key) now. It's "fine" -- nothing I'd pay more to have, but not really a negative, either.

On the other hand, I keep my MBP docked more often than not, and only use the built-in keyboard after hours or while traveling (which, well... doesn't happen anymore anyway).
 
  • Like
Reactions: viss and jdoll021
I have your options for you!

Option #1: Cover up that touchbar; suitable for a Silver MBP!
Option #2: Stylish, a great solution for the charcoal or black MBP
Option #3: A lovely choice for the gold MBP! Can also repair your gold toilets and bathroom fixtures!

And there you have it, your "Optional" touchbar!

Let’s see, that would be a no...no...and, hold on, let me check something, oh yeah...NO! :)
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
  • Haha
Reactions: Flight Plan
This is where I'm at. I think a 12" MacBook with the M series has a lot of potential over the previous generations. The size of that machine was just so nice. The new processors means it can run much, much faster though.

My wishlist is a 12" MacBook that's got bezels thin enough to be pretty close to on par with the 13.3" models, the newer keyboards (that's a given at this point) and two ports instead of one. In a perfect world, 3-4 ports with at least one USB-C on the right. Oh yeah, and make it available in red, lol.
That's exactly what I want, ideally in a matte black, but that isn't happening. The bezels need to be reduced. I am just wondering if the MacBook will be brought back or not - right now it doesn't feel like it will. I hope I am wrong.

Edit: https://www.macrumors.com/2020/12/04/apple-researching-matte-black-finish/

Well well, would ya look a that.
 
Last edited:
Chromebooks cannot run the Adobe products I need, unfortunately. Plus I just prefer macOS. Also the build quality on Chromebooks is so hit/miss. I prefer to buy something that doesn't feel quite so disposable.
Adobe apps are not “cloud-based” btw, despite having “Cloud” in the name. Cloud-tethered (i.e. license renewals) is more appropriate. Most of the processing is done by your computer, not theirs. “Cloud” is just a cloudy word for “someone else’s computers”.
 
Better make it 64GB on the 16”, and could also use a 27” mini-LED AppleDisplay to couple with it.
Don’t we all miss magsafe? I think even Apple must miss it (proprietary chargers?), though EU is pushing towards non-sense “universal” charging interface.
USB-PD is “universal enough” to charge electronics for now. Being able to deliver 100W should be sufficient in the near future until the world’s airlines increases their 27A limit of in-flight personal batteries. That is, when flying is back “in vogue” again.

Besides, having 15 hours battery life tend to significantly reduce the need to be plugged in.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.