(Not that I think the burden of providing quantifiable data should have been on the person who is claiming DVD is a ubiquitous technology, but I obliged anyway, since it was so easy.)
??? Because you made a
claim that something is ubiquitous there's no compelling reason to back up your claim with real data other than to satisfy my curiosity? I'm flattered by your dedication to enlightening me but it was your argument that having an integrated DVD in a computer is an ubiquitous technology, that I'm questioning in the first place. If your claim is going to have any credibility at all you do have a burden of providing quantifiable proof, otherwise your claim is nothing more than an opinion.
See above. I have provided quantifiable data, if you want to take the time to read it.
I may have posted that comment before I got a chance to read your quantifiable data, but having done so I'd like to respond. I have a hard time buying a Nielsen report from 2006, over 5 years old, as being relevant information given the pace at which technology and media consumption have changed. If you believe that the delta between DVD usage and streaming media hasn't changed over the last 5 years your sadly out of touch with the times.
It also seemed to me that the Nielsen study was focused on DVD consumption in general, not DVD usage on a computer. Apple didn't pull dedicated DVD players out of anyones living room and I would hazard a guess that most of these DVD aficionados can still watch DVD's the same way most of us did back in 06, on a dedicated DVD player.
While the NY Times article you cited was more current you did fail to mention a fairly relevant point the article made, that in addition to a lack of high speed internet options in many of these rural areas there was also a relatively small base of computer owners. If you don't own a computer does it really matter if it has a DVD player or not?
How do you hand out your photos to clients? Because last I checked, CD/DVD is the standard, accepted format to provide the client with the digital files.
And when was the last time you checked, 2006? The accepted format is dependent on the clients needs, not on any single convention such as paper, optical, or online. If online access meets the clients needs why would they want to wait for a DVD? Services such as SmugMug and Zenfolio are able to offer free accounts to casual users because of the amount of business they have in offering professional accounts.
Whenever I shoot graduations or marching band competitions, the company I work for requires that I burn the shoot to a CD. It's in the contract. When I shoot models, often times we do "trade for CD." They expect a physical CD or DVD at the end of the shoot; it's the customary and standard thing to do. When I shoot an event at a night club or music venue...
Again, the method of delivery should be tailored to the clients needs not to requirements imposed by the photographer. Have you even offered any of your clients an online option or is your convenience more important than the clients needs. Saying your customer expects a certain method of delivery is meaningless if you haven't offered them any options.
I find it's easiest to simply burn my files to disc, hand it to the client, and wash my hands of it. I don't need/want to store those files on a server, nor does the client want them on the internet.
Once you give the client a DVD of the pictures you wash your hands of it? So if your client looses or damages the DVD their SOL because its too inconvenient for you to store copies on a sever? If find that completely unacceptable and a flagrant disregard of customer satisfaction. As to the client not wanting their pictures on the internet, No one is suggesting you post their pictures to a public Flikr account. Do you encrypt the DVD you give them incase it falls into the wrong hands?
When I shoot a video of a wedding or a band, they also want a DVD (most lack Blu-Ray). Online distribution there is also a big no-no, because they want to put it online themselves, and they want a physical copy for copyright reasons. But the Nikon D700 doesn't shoot video, so I guess that wouldn't concern you.
Spot on I have no interest in video
At any rate, where do you upload to, and how many GB of files do you have stored there? How much does it cost per month? Just curious.
I pay $150 a year for unlimited storage with a SmugMug Pro account. Keep in mind that the account gives me features beyond simply allowing potential clients online access to my work The account also acts as a digital storefront for selling my work.
I do not suggest that a DVD drive is needed for being a hobbyist photographer, though for working in the industry, for a lot of us, it's a must.
and here is a good example of what I ment by your recurring them.
For a lot of us, some of you yes, but your phrasing implies that the majority of pro photographers need to have DVD in their workflow, and I simply do not believe that to be the case.
We burn a lot of CDs from film actually.
My lab is one of the few that still processes quite a bit of film; of course a CD is the only way to film scans from a lab. Most digital shooters don't need us to burn their shots for them, but many do. When we burn from digital, a lot of times it's because of memory recovery from corrupted SD cards, which we recover and then burn onto gold archival DVDs. I'd say the average camera of customers who want things burned to disk is something like a 12-megapixel point-and-shoot or SLR; large JPGs. Camera phone people never ask for CD burns.
Is there a technical reason that scanned film must be burned to DVD rather than offered to the client via the internet? I could see file size as being a factor but certainly not a limitation. Here again though you are defending your ubiquitous technology argument with by providing us with another example limited to a relatively small segment of Mac users
Unfortunately I learned many of my social skills while serving in the USMC, so if I''ve come across a bit to blunt at times you have my apologies. While I'm not buying your
ubiquitous technology argument, and your not buying my defense of the SuperDriveless Mini, I have enjoyed this debate.