That would be sad. Did you read that somewhere?
Question - if I have a A/V receiver with AirPlay 2, will it support lossless via my iPhone on AirPlay?
hehe the DAC of this Adapter is garbage compared to a decently build-in headphone jack.
It's so bad that not even Apple dares to write down detailed specs on their site.
Also have fun charging and listening at the same time, and if you own the Airpods Max the situation becomes even worse.
Apple Lossless will be a miserable experience on Apples own platform, except if you own a supported older iPhone with headphone jack (<=iPhone7), and a decent third party headphone. A bummer for a company glorifying their own ecosystem.
What is strange about the homepods, is that since day one they have been able to decode and playback, natively, FLAC and ALAC streams up to 24/48. At least it says so in the audio specs. So I do not understand the need of a software update to support apple music lossless, unless they internally transcode every lossless stream to AAC 256.
Perhaps their internal DSP/Auto EQ/Beamforming process only support AAC 256 files.
But then if that the case all the people who claim that they have been airplaying their local lossless colection to the homepods since the speaker came out in 2018... that wasn´t lossless?. The Homepod have been converting it to AAC 256 this whole time?.
Airplay 1 support up to 16/44. Is lossless because the audio gets transmited in an ALAC container.
Airplay 2 support up tp 24/48 in a LPCM container. If you sent a 16/44 stream over Airplay 2, it will be encapsulated in ALAC. If you sent a 24 bit stream, it will be encapsulated in LPCM because ALAC over Airplay only support 16 bits.
What do you think about this, @Marco Klobas?. Great post, by the way!.
@B/D
A) Correct (with the AirPlay intrinsic limit of 44.1 kHz for audio).
B) Local files (those present in your Music Library and stored locally) are streamed ALAC. Those coming from iCloud (Apple Music catalogue) are streamed AAC.
It's definitely dumb. This is the reason why many AirPlay users (e.g. Naim users) are disappointed to see coming an AAC stream from lossless Apple Music. As you said, if everything were working as expected, Apple shouldn't have announced a lossless update for HomePod.
Most of us, me included, took for granted that lossless Apple Music would have supported AirPlay as expected: lossless at 44.1 kHz. Unfortunately, that's not the case. At least for AirPlay 2.
It's not the receiver (HomePod or whatever) that messes the AirPlay stream. It's specifically the Apple Music app.
"Also have fun charging and listening at the same time, ...."
"Apple Lossless will be a miserable experience on Apples own platform, ...."
Since Apple removed the headphone jack (>=iPhone8), and decided to include a lightning to 3.5mm adapter, people started to moan that their iPhone listening experience started to suck.In case you haven’t heard, the iPhone 8 or later features integrated wireless charging that allows for an easy and intuitive charging.
I wouldn’t consider listening to Apple’s Lossless Audio up to 24-bit/48 kHz on my iPhone using the Lightning to 3.5 mm Headphone Jack Adapter a miserable experience. Fortunately, I have the required gear to listen to Apple’s Hi-Res Lossless Audio on my iPhone 12 Pro.
Since Apple removed the headphone jack (>=iPhone8), and decided to include a lightning to 3.5mm adapter, people started to moan that their iPhone listening experience started to suck.
E.g. they could not simply sit in their bed, and hold the iPhone, charge, listen, browse the web at the same time anymore.
Now a days with "wireless" charging, this experience is still cumbersome, holding the iPhone with a massive wired magnetic puck in your bed + adapter + headphones does not make this experience better.
Removing the headphone jack was one of the worst decisions that Apple ever made, specially without having a adequate widely compatible replacement solution.
And now with lossless audio popping up everywhere, this wrongly made decision is throwing up again.
They were even so stupid to *not* build an extended bluetooth coded solution like Sony's LDAC, simply to make the buyers of their 600$ Airpods Max happy. And no doubt that the Airpods Max were in development for approx 2-4 years, it's not something that couldn't have been achieved during that dev time.
Sorry, but their so highly praised "ecosystem" just failed hard here, again.
Nobody wants weird cascaded audio solutions for a mobile listening experience, and run around like a moron.
"And forget about getting 192/24 on your phone, home pod or anything but a system like pictured above."
Thats what im saying. Most people wont know what they need and expect the Beats they got for Christmas three years ago to be good. YOU NEED A PROPER DAC.You are wrong. I have been listening to ‘Hi-Res Audio’ >24-bit/192 kHz on my iPhones for a few years now. All you need is the proper gear.
Thats what im saying. Most people wont know what they need and expect the Beats they got for Christmas three years ago to be good. YOU NEED A PROPER DAC.