Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Leaked Documents Suggest Apple Could Be Forced to Build iPhones With User-Removable Batteries in Europe
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
... and Samsung and OnePlus and ...
If customers were flocking to removeable battery phones, we wouldn't be seeing fewer and fewer flagship phone models with that capability.
How did we ever manage doing these same activities in pre-cell phone days? This obsession to be "always reachable" is part of the problem. Obviously others will have other views.
yes yes yes.......
So many phone of so many brands can get slower due to battery problems.
I remember when you could pop the back off and simply fit a new battery.
I'd love to have that ability to return for all users to easily do.
So many phone of so many brands can get slower due to battery problems.
I remember when you could pop the back off and simply fit a new battery.
I'd love to have that ability to return for all users to easily do.
This is a great idea. It will encourage more countries to follow the UK and Exit the EU so they also can ignore silly rules made by idiot bureaucrats.
Don't assume a long distance runner carries a phone to be reachable by others.
There are various other reasons to carry the phone -- music, data-recording, and even as simple as calling for help in the event of an injury miles from home.
How about the gov't shouldn't interfere in the free market. Apple recycles phones for free, they got a robot. Just mail the old iPhone to them. The mail is enough involvement for the gov't.
Whatever the reason, people ran these same distances before cell phones and managed just fine.
People tend to buy a new phone when they need a new battery. If a battery costs $79, and a new iPhone 11 costs $20 (per month), it's a really easy upsell for the genius bar associate.
At a car dealership, if you can get someone willing to sit down, negotiate, and want to replace their car, there's an 80% chance the person will buy a new car today, even if they walked in with the intent of not buying.
I don't know what the exact metrics Apple has, but if you compare the genius bar to a car dealership a battery replacement has the capability to drive a lot of sales, and in turn e-waste.
There are several models of phone on the market today with that capability.
Why didn't you buy one of those?
In my experience iPhone batteries do not last particularly long. My iPhone SE batteries lasted about 12-18 months before noticable degradation (about 60% of original), with replacement performed by Apple Auth service centre for a fee.
I don't game with them, or watch movies. Don't deep discharge. Live in a cold climate and as a HW engineer I'm quite aware of LiIon chemistry and charge recommendations.
Almost everyone I know has been less than impressed with iPhone battery lifecycle life.
This is clearly something that the industry would prefer to not happen as they really want to sell consumers the latest phone every 18 months if possible.
And a higher price for the extra added materials costs for the extra latching, connectors, waterproofing and safety required for a user accessible battery compartment. Apple will probably have to make EU customers pay £200 more for a thicker heavier device with less battery life. Enjoy your bureaucratic rules.
Hillarious how the as is now iphone was twisted into a bad thing in the first place.
The EU overreaching again 
Yes, I'm sure it's well intentioned, but they do say the road to hell is paved with those At any rate I don't expect this to affect the rest of us, if it comes to it, Apple (and Samsung, Sony, Nokia, Google, Motorola...) is more likely to continue developing the iPhone to their own vision for most of the world and put out a specific chunkier USB C/ removable battery XR/11 model for continental Europe!
Yes, I'm sure it's well intentioned, but they do say the road to hell is paved with those At any rate I don't expect this to affect the rest of us, if it comes to it, Apple (and Samsung, Sony, Nokia, Google, Motorola...) is more likely to continue developing the iPhone to their own vision for most of the world and put out a specific chunkier USB C/ removable battery XR/11 model for continental Europe!
I mean, i get it that some have concerns about the waterproofing, but everything else? Would you even notice this change? I mean, iPhones look gorgeous, but as soon as you buy them, you put them in a case and never look at the back of that thing again. So what exactly would change? And please dont tell me, you dont use a case, cause they are made out of glass, and are slippery as hell.
Generally it means the ability to change batteries without any tools.
It is unclear however if that is what was meant in the draft document, or if they meant something akin to what you suggest.
Indeed. My phone--when I carry it--is in DND mode when I'm running or cycling. I only carry it for emergencies. I've had to call my wife three times in the last 15 years for a rescue: once running when I sprained an ankle and twice cycling when I crashed--once avoiding a deer and once avoiding a car.
Just because I could manage fine, doesn't mean that there is no utility in a waterproof phone. As I said, I used to carry a phone in a Ziploc bag on long runs or rides.
I have the same phone too. No issues so far the battery is just fine. Also, change battery nowadays is not a huge deal. Usually cost less than $50 for older phones and you have someone else (hopefully knowing what they are doing) doing the replacement for you.
There must be phones for sale that meet your criteria.
Plastics aren’t where Apple is at. They want to sell premium phones. The same way Ferrari isn't going to downscale their cars and sell them for $50k.