Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
With the mini/nano Apple seem to keep switching the design between, curved aluminum to chrome back.
mini - curved aluminum
1g nano - chrome back
2g nano - curved aluminum
3g nano - chrome back
4g nano - curved aluminum ?

PS why won't this forum let me spell aluminum properly?
 
Ooh it's as thin as Steve!

Would be nice to do widescreen video on it. I'm hoping for a 16gb nano, the remote control rumour sounds good too and transfer songs wirelessly. Wonder if they'll be any Apple TV updates? Would love to see that USB port opened up for external drives 'offically' rather than it being hacked.
 
Why can't anyone take a nice focused High Quality picture of these things when they see em. Obviously they are some where which holds a ton of technology and most cellphones have 1-2 mega pixel cameras... I just don't get it.:confused:
 
Not exciting. Bigger and dated. C'mon Apple.

I was hoping to see the Nano Touch. What about you guys?
 
I'm usually awful at visualisation, but that's pretty much how I expected it from drawings :/. Anyway, size comparison of 2g/3g/4g from various angles.

Easier to fit in an empty jeans pocket, harder to fit in a half full one. Perhaps easier to hold while vertical, but more awkward while horizontal. That much is testable with 5 minutes cutting up wood. As for curviness, 3g seems like 1g; 4g seems like exaggerated 2g. I prefer the 1g/3g style; I was thinking these give a better grip but given that hands and fingers mould around the edges I might have to limit it to an aesthetic preference.

Why can't anyone take a nice focused High Quality picture of these things when they see em.
Thoughts:

1. If you're taking a sneaky pic, you try to be as quick and subtle as possible.

2. Apply a filter to reduce chances of identifying marks. Not just against serial numbers/unique unit blemishes but perhaps against any watermarks the camera puts on the picture directly (aside from easily removable EXIF). I'm guessing that if printer manufacturers do the sneaky thing with the yellow ink so you can trace a printout back to a printer, so might camera builders?

A basic encoding of a 10-digit decimal serial number, say, would require colouring only ceil(34/8)=5 bits. Better algorithms adjusting more of the picture could be made resistant to common filters (and JPEG fuzzing!).

One low tech approach to deniability would be to get a friend to take a photo of the photo.

3. Add to the mystery.
 
Price drop please

My iPod 3G Classic is getting really tired, and I can't afford a new one. All I want is a cheaper Nano, like 8 or 16 gigs for 100 bucks or euros (even refurbished will suit me). Another question: does Apple sell old stock models cheaper immediately after the new releases? Do you guys remember from earlier updates?
 
I think only the backside should have been curved, like the iPhone 3G. Being completely round is just stupid, in my opinion. However, anything is better than the hideous square nano.
 
Alright people, this is official now! (*veterans will note that I usually do this every time...haha)
 

Attachments

  • Picture 1.png
    Picture 1.png
    369.3 KB · Views: 148
Cna't help i: I still hate the new design :(

Mainly because I see it as a step backwards, since it's bigger then the fatty. In this way, this iPod nano has a lower 'nano-factor' then the current one :(


But anyhow I don't really care, since I'm only in the market for the updated iPod touch :D (I hope the 32GB one gets cheaper!!!)
 
Why would you need both means of input? :confused:

The best of both worlds. One of the most common complaints about the iPod touch is that you cannot control your music while the device is in your pocket.

Also, doesn't one of the Palm phones have a keyboard and touch screen?
 
haha - all you folks who hated the design can suck on it cos you have to live with it now! hahahaha

I love that. I'm gunna get one. In orange. Nice...
 
If they don't offer it, make it. Introducing Nano Touch :)

If they don't offer it, make it. Introducing Nano Touch :)

Cool, right??
 

Attachments

  • 233313-ipod_nano_4g_spy1_400-2.jpg
    233313-ipod_nano_4g_spy1_400-2.jpg
    86.2 KB · Views: 925
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.