I really hope this is wrong..
I need to replace my December 2016 AirPods ---- like yesterday
I need to replace my December 2016 AirPods ---- like yesterday
I very much feel the same. I really hope that Apple will encourage people to trade-in their old AirPods, regardless of condition, for a discount. Even a basic 10% for unusable old devices would be fantastic. This would encourage recycling and be very much in-line with Apple’s commitment to the environment and reduction of e-waste. I am very much sceptical of Apple’s intentions when it comes the latter though, admittedly.I think for my next AirPods, I will just bite the bullet and pay $29 for 2-year AppleCare+. Given how often I use AirPods, the batteries will most assuredly dip below 80% within 2 years.
Wow that is expensive, can get 2nd gen on Amazon for $116My first generation AirPods get less than 15 minutes after three and a half years. As reluctant as I am to buy another pair of disposable ear phones for £160 I probably would have snapped them up if they were ready next week.
Gen 2 are still above £120 on the U.K. ‘high-street’ at the moment. I can’t imagine a decrease from the original £159 price to the latest version though.Wow that is expensive, can get 2nd gen on Amazon for $116
You do have April 1st coming up!Yep it looks as if the like of Prosser and Co have got it wrong.
All we have heard from fairly reliable sources is that iPads are ready to go, Airtags are ready to go, AirPods 3 are ready to go and there will be an event on the 23rd.
With one week to go, that’s all looking very unlikely now unless of course Apple release one or some of those products without an event.
There is. Because some of these ‘insiders’, have proven they have had connections to Apples production assembly. It’s not common that they’re always accurate with release dates, but some of the leaked hardware from iPhone, the Apple Watch were completely accurate.there is such a thing as "reliable leaker" ... LOL
Just buy Apple Care with your next pair.My first generation AirPods get less than 15 minutes after three and a half years. As reluctant as I am to buy another pair of disposable ear phones for £160 I probably would have snapped them up if they were ready next week.
My 2018sI really hope this is wrong..
I need to replace my December 2016 AirPods ---- like yesterday
Supposedly, there is nothing to recycle or reuse in most true wireless earbuds once they are worn out: The tight construction of them make it impossible to disassemble. And since the battery can’t beI very much feel the same. I really hope that Apple will encourage people to trade-in their old AirPods, regardless of condition, for a discount. Even a basic 10% for unusable old devices would be fantastic. This would encourage recycling and be very much in-line with Apple’s commitment to the environment and reduction of e-waste. I am very much sceptical of Apple’s intentions when it comes the latter though, admittedly.
Like I’ve said before. They are probably just going to upgrade the AirPods and the AirPods Pro. And then call it a day.
The number of people desperate to buy every Apple product and getting stressed when they can’t because they come out too close together is vanishingly small. Apple is obviously not going to build its release schedule around those people.I think Apple should only release 12 products per year..one for each month..that way people ALWAYS have to something to talk about and buy all year round instead once every quarter..by cramping all the products in the same time it’s a stress for buyers to decide which one( s ) to buy not to mention shelling out big chunk of money the same time.
AppleCare really does pay for itself with just one use. It’s really a good buy in my opinion. Even if it’s just for the battery replacement on an iPhone/iPad/AirPods like you said. But especially with physical damageI think for my next AirPods, I will just bite the bullet and pay $29 for 2-year AppleCare+. Given how often I use AirPods, the batteries will most assuredly dip below 80% within 2 years.
I think Apple should only release 12 products per year..one for each month..that way people ALWAYS have to something to talk about and buy all year round instead once every quarter..by cramping all the products in the same time it’s a stress for buyers to decide which one( s ) to buy not to mention shelling out big chunk of money the same time.
The number of people desperate to buy every Apple product and getting stressed when they can’t because they come out too close together is vanishingly small. Apple is obviously not going to build its release schedule around those people.
I think it’s easy to forget on these forums that 99% of Apple’s target market isn’t “Apple fans”, they’re just consumers who don’t follow the latest news and announcements.
I think they'll time the release to be just as everyone's non-replaceable rechargeable batteries begin failing.
But most people aren't buying one product a month or even once a year. Most people – the significant majority of who Apple is selling products to – will buy one iPad every two years at most, and a Mac way less frequently than that. It doesn't matter how or when they space the releases through the year, that just doesn't reflect how ordinary consumers buy electronic products. Yes, it bothers the kind of people who post on Macrumors.com. But we are a tiny proportion of Apple's revenues.I don’t think it’s a coincidence that iPad sales started to dip when they moved the annual refresh from April to Oct/Nov. Most people only have so much money to spend in one month. Spreading out new product releases helps everyone budget better.
.
That is exactly what Steve Jobs said. If there was no new hardware to announce he would fill in the gaps with new software announcements. But announce something each month. Tim Crook is too busy axing perfectly good products instead.
.