I loveee my HomePods, but for the love of God... Please Apple... Make Siri smarter. If I have to hear “just a sec” or “hold on, I’m on it!” when I ask to play a simple popular song, I’m gonna go crazy Lol.
I love the sound and design. Just needs better software and AI.
I would totally get a HomePod mini. I wonder if it’s going to have any new features that the regular doesn’t have. We’ll see.
Its HomePod not TravelPod.Exactly. The fact that HomePod can't just be a Bluetooth speaker is hurting its appeal.
And do HomePods still need to be plugged into the wall?
There's a reason people still buy simple wireless Bluetooth speakers from JBL, UE, etc. You can easily take them in the backyard by the pool or in the garage. And anyone can easily connect to them at a party.
I understand that HomePods sound amazing for their size. And they have Siri and HomeKit in there too. They are true "smart" speakers.
But sometimes people just want sound that's not chained to the wall.
My portable bluetooth speaker isn't dime a dozen crap (Sonos Move). And i don't think the the HomePod is unique, other than it's the only one with an apple logo on it. I have my phone nearby or my apple watch on all the time, so Siri is in every room already. I use Siri to airplay to my Move or multiple Symfonisks' all of the time.But you've said those things exist - so what's the point in Apple doing it too. Crap sounding portable bluetooth speakers are a dime a dozen, the HomePod is at least unique - I really don't want a battery powered HomePod - I just want Siri in every room.
I have zero prob streaming any music I want. And these are an incredible bargain and value if they were priced twice as highI think you're confusing value with cost. Sure it might have a high value to you, but the cost is also too high. Especially when compared to any competing device.
But given how limited the music streaming services are on what is essentially a speaker designed for listening to music, I'd argue that it doesn't have a very high value either.
It cAnt be too difficult to move from one room to another and plug in. Batteries need to be charged also so still tethered to an outlet.If it's £100 i'll buy a HomePod mini for every room just for Siri.
HomePods don't sell for 300 dollars from anyone but Apple. No one is gonna buy a new one for that price.Being allowed to buy 10 HomePods at 50% rebate means an employee can actually make a few hundred dollars extra money by buying $299 HomePods for $150 and selling them for $200. So it's a little bit of tax free income.
It’s a really good Airplay speaker and you can pretty much play anything from your phone/iPad/Mac including Spotify, YouTube, twitch, soundcloud etc. I stream twitch all the time.
It really isn’t as big of deal as people make out.
I'd like to have the HomePod to be used as a mic input - that way I could use it as the speaker and mic for video calls, FaceTime etc. I think I can only use it as a speaker in its current form.
Yeah with massive lag. The actual user experience is horrible in this scenario.not true at all. Can use it via Bluetooth with phone or Mac.
If it’s the same just smaller and less sound they better price it no higher than £70-90
If the price is any different it will tank bad as the homepod didAre you new here?
If the price is any different it will tank bad as the homepod did
I would agree with you if it were a little louder. As it stands, I need a stereo pair to even get close to the volume that I like (in a small/medium size living room). At $200 ($400 pair) they are fantastic, but I would never pay $1000 for a pair simply because it is not loud enough.I think the regular HomePod is a wonderful bargain even if it were priced at $500. For a small speaker the sound quality is unmatched at this price point. I think people who complain that it’s too expensive want APPLE to give them away. And I use any music service I want to play from using my iPhone, including Spotify. Rings on the wooden surface? Give me a break. People pay $200 for AirPods yet complain about $200-300 for these beauties.
I think the regular HomePod is a wonderful bargain even if it were priced at $500. For a small speaker the sound quality is unmatched at this price point. I think people who complain that it’s too expensive want APPLE to give them away. And I use any music service I want to play from using my iPhone, including Spotify. Rings on the wooden surface? Give me a break. People pay $200 for AirPods yet complain about $200-300 for these beauties.
HomePod 1 has Bluetooth 5.0. Software just limits Bluetooth usage.Better connectivity. Bluetooth for when guests come round and want to share something from their Android phones, and line in for a more reliable connection to your TV.
You might need to invest in hearing aids soon. Mine shake the walls at 75%I would agree with you if it were a little louder. As it stands, I need a stereo pair to even get close to the volume that I like (in a small/medium size living room). At $200 ($400 pair) they are fantastic, but I would never pay $1000 for a pair simply because it is not loud enough.
Agree😁Why not raise the Price to $1,500.00 ????![]()
Unfortunately, there is no way HomeKit could come close to doing all I do in my smart home. There just aren't enough products supporting HomeKit whereas everything supports Alexa. I'm not overly paranoid about privacy, the way I look at it is everything is out there and everything we type on Facebook, here, etc. is sold as part of big data, so I can deal with googling something and having it show on my news feed and the side bars right here on MacRumors.I got rid of my amazon echo devices (had one in every room) when I decided to make the switch to Apple HomeKit exclusively. Bought a HomePod for the living room for voice commands, and have been using my iPhone/ Apple Watch in other rooms. I look forward to buying this smaller one for rooms where the quality isn’t as critical.
I made the switch as I’ve been trying to escape the amazon and google ecosystem, mostly for privacy reasons. But to each their own.
Unfortunately, there is no way HomeKit could come close to doing all I do in my smart home. There just aren't enough products supporting HomeKit whereas everything supports Alexa. I'm not overly paranoid about privacy, the way I look at it is everything is out there and everything we type on Facebook, here, etc. is sold as part of big data, so I can deal with googling something and having it show on my news feed and the side bars right here on MacRumors.
Haha. I don't like to turn mine past about 65% or so because the bass frequencies start to noticeably roll off a bit around that level. I prefer to retain the full-bodied sound, but if I could go up max volume on these while retaining accurate bass levels, I would agree with you on the $500 comment.You might need to invest in hearing aids soon. Mine shake the walls at 75%
[automerge]1602094620[/automerge]
Agree😁
But you've said those things exist - so what's the point in Apple doing it too. Crap sounding portable bluetooth speakers are a dime a dozen, the HomePod is at least unique - I really don't want a battery powered HomePod - I just want Siri in every room.