Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Personally I'm tempted, not just to build a hackintosh but rather building a desktop. OSX compatibility would be a plus since I own a MBP.

Based on the responses here, as long as you pick the hardware that's pretty close to apple's it may be a smooth install.

I'm looking at a i7-930 build that's basically equals the base MacPro (other then not being xeon processors) and I'm under a grand for everything. The MP, is 2500 at the based. My configuration, I get more ram (6gig) a larger HD and a better GPU.

That's tough to beat
 
Some people misunderstood my post.

Can you get a hack running as stable as a Mac Pro? Why yes of course! And yes, the process can be very simple.

But let's say you start getting random kernel panics.

Is it perhaps one of the new USB peripherals you recently bought?
Is it your BIOS settings that are wrong?
Did the last update you made, mess up something?
Are your memory modules malfunctioning?
Is a kext in /Extra conflicting with something?
Are you missing something in the DSDT?

With a Mac Pro, you would get support directly from Apple.
Should your machine be out of service period, there are still very good coverage of problems and solutions on forums and, because of the Mac being very shut in and low in configurable modes, the variables that can have caused the problem are very low.

But with a hackintosh, you suddenly have so many things that can be causing the error. And don't count on support. Yes the Insanelymac forum is a very great forum. But since problems can, as I just said, depend on so many variables, it's very hard for someone to identify the cause for you. Don't be surprised if your topic goes unanswered, not only because no one has the answer but sometimes because the answer is well known and people ignore you as a silent message to "dude, use the search function".

and then you're on your own. bound to spend hours and maybe days to find a solution to your problem. Sucks to be in the middle of a work deadline then, huh?

I enjoyed planning, building, and installing my hackintosh, but as a earlier poster said, I always yearned for the real thing. I would say, if you have the money, always go for the real thing.
 
It seems we are definitely at a turning point for the mac pro. There are far fewer compelling osx-only apps out there that would prevent power users from migrating to Windows. I priced out a top-of-the line 12 core workstation using a Supermicro X8 series board, dual 5600 Xeons, 16GB memory- all for less than $5K. It is doubtful a similarly configured MP will come in for less than 6k. It also doesnt seem likely such a build could be a successful hackintosh, unfortunately.

As a former PC user, I really like OSX. However most of my work is with Adobe CS4, so basically the same on each platform. It is tempting to consider. . .
 
It seems we are definitely at a turning point for the mac pro.

Hasn't that always been the case? More apps on windows, I mean. As for the turning point. I agree. It seems apple is more enamored with mobile computing and desktop technology has taken a back seat.
 
After having built a Hackontish HTPC I just don't see a good reason to do it. If you want to build your own hardware do so but make your life a lot easier and just use Windows for you OS. OSX brings no compelling advantages to a home built PC nd does bring plenty of headaches.
 
OSX brings no compelling advantages to a home built PC nd does bring plenty of headaches.
Other then OSX being better then windows. Also for folks like me who already have OSX software, it makes sense if you don't want to spend the $$ for apple hardware.

I hear you on the headaches, though its subjective as to whether its worth it or not
 
Like many others here, I myself have a hackintosh. The initial problems I had were due to an incompatible graphics card which I had to shell out to replace, however, that was my only issue.

The reason I went down the hackintosh route was because I wanted a tower for upgradability and the ability to have dual (identical) displays, but I couldn't afford a Mac Pro. I now don't use identical displays but even if I did, the Mac Mini now has that ability.

However...like many others, I am always yearning for the real thing so I'm currently looking at the possibility of buying an iMac or even a Mac Mini. This doesn't mean that my hackintosh isn't a capable machine, I just want to own a real Mac.
 
@Tutor: Nice!

I don't need a new machine now, so I am content to wait and see what Apple has to offer. It was kinda fun though to put together my dream system on Newegg- Supermicro X8DAH, dual 5680's, 24GB, Radeon 5870, case and PS for $5500. I could live with that system Windows only;)
 
FWIW...

I recently built a hackintosh, and its been great.

I followed the Lifehacker guide. This took all the "figuring out" work, as I didn't have time to do the leg work myself. The guide was flawless, the build was easy, and its been amazing. All updates went flawlessly. I feel like this build is a good "halfway point" between purchasing a Mac Pro from apple and from completely building a Hackintosh on your own.
 
The main advantages of going with an apple one are:
- top customer service even after your warranty has expired
- you will get all the software updates without any delay from a 3rd party
Hardware do fail and nowadays more than ever.
 
I think ultimately if you value your time and official tech support you go for the real Mac. Even if you are technically inclined and can handle building and supporting it yourself, do you really want to? For some people it's no problem, for others it isn't worth the effort.

All the PC's I've ever owned have been self-built, but after a while I just don't feel like doing that anymore. When I was in college it saved me money, now it just wastes my time. I prefer an intel Mac cause then I don't even have to build a PC anymore and would like the convenience of a warranty and support should I need it.

I'm more inclined to buy a higher end Mac Pro when it gets refreshed. I don't know if it's really cheaper to build one with the same specs (i.e. with xeons not the equivalent consumer chip). Not when you count what I lose in support.
 
My Mac Pro 1.1 dual 3.0 GHz was, and still is, a fine machine but Apple will no longer support it with updates. It has a 32 bit only EFI firmware compared with 64 bit for newer Mac Pros and Apple will not issue newer firmware as their mantra is "Buy a newer supported machine". Also the same with updated PCIe graphics cards, Apple will not support them in the older Mac Pro even though they may work.

It is this nonsense that made me consider building my own i7 solution. I'll support it myself and the bonus is not having to rely on it being abandoned when the Mac Pro line next gets a refresh.

I'll grant you it's a steep learning curve but the two months spent inside the heart of this machine means that I know how it works and how to recover any problems that may crop up. I know the internal workings of this machine more intimately than I do my own wife.

Apple take note, why have you abandoned me?
 
I would definitely say, for a desktop, a hackintosh. I mean, by all means, if you have the money to spend, there's nothing like a real mac. But at the same time, going that route because people tell you osx86 is "unstable", requires you to "jump through hoops", involves constant "tinkering", is utterly retarded. Honestly, you need to try it yourself before you take someone else's word for it. My hackintosh experience was far from smooth, but the main reason being that it was my first time actually using OS X in depth to begin with. After initial confusion, troubleshooting, frustration, I know it well enough to where I need TWO third party kexts and nothing else to have a complete vanilla install on my desktop, and can get the whole thing set up in a matter of minutes should I ever need to reinstall. Here's the other thing:

People like to throw around the misconception that software updates "break" hackintosh setups. Okay, granted, I haven't been on the "scene" for that long, but I think the technology and methods have gotten advanced enough to where this is a thing of the past. In my relatively short experience with osx86, the only update that did any kind of damage to hackintosh systems was 10.6.2 and that was ONLY for netbooks with atom CPUs. Not a problem for a desktop, especially when you can customize your own hardware.

Another plus, your hackintosh will be guaranteed to be several times faster and more modern than any desktop apple ever makes, period. As long as the hardware is supported, which nearly all of it is, the sky is really the limit. SLI works now, dual monitors are no problem, new CPUs, hell last time I checked they found a way to install straight from the DVD, no need for any bootloaders.

Which brings me to my last point - the whole thing about KPs, tinkering, always swapping out kexts, etc. sounds like a load of crap to me. If that's really your experience, then you clearly have either very old components or just incompatible hardware, bad choice on your part. In my experience, even though people had a lot of difficulty getting osx86 working on my mobo, it is possible, and I have had absolutely zero problems since I got everything working initially. I haven't needed to modify a single kext, I haven't gotten a single KP, everything WORKS just like a mac does.

So I really suggest that you try it out for yourself. It's absolutely worth it if you put the time into it, because like I said, once you get it worked out and get comfortable with the process that goes into building a hackintosh, you'll love yourself for the money you save.
 
My Mac Pro 1.1 dual 3.0 GHz was, and still is, a fine machine but Apple will no longer support it with updates. It has a 32 bit only EFI firmware compared with 64 bit for newer Mac Pros and Apple will not issue newer firmware as their mantra is "Buy a newer supported machine".

Apple take note, why have you abandoned me?
That seems to be one of the darker secrets of apple, in that if you're a generation behind, apple will not even provide the simplest updates. I'd not really single them out, as I believe most other manufacturers are even worse at this.

A home built computer has an advantage and that you control your own destiny in support, and updates. While this could be a disadvantage for those who don't want to deal with problems, i.e., bring it into an apple store. Ultimately I think its a better move.
 
It isn't illegal. It might be unethical, but Apple's EULA is not law. It's a contract.

It is illegal to violate the terms of a contract that you agreed to upon installation of the OS. You would would be subject to penalties determined by judgement in a court of law.

Just because you won't go to jail doesn't make not illegal. Getting caught is another matter.
 
It is illegal to violate the terms of a contract that you agreed to upon installation of the OS. You would would be subject to penalties determined by judgement in a court of law.

Just because you won't go to jail doesn't make not illegal. Getting caught is another matter.

one could doubt the legality of that 'contract'
 
one could doubt the legality of that 'contract'

Only people with no understanding of laws and no moral standards.

It isn't illegal. It might be unethical, but Apple's EULA is not law. It's a contract.

Which by definition means you're breaking a legally binding contract....which is illegal.
The EULA says you can't make copies, so why don't you make copies and sell them on eBay? Its not illegal according to you.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.