My point was that your analogy to Jaguar was a bit wrong, Jaguar have improved in quality ten fold since being bought by an Indian company (Tata).
Jaguar since the late 70's (and probably before) through to the late 90's were renowned for poor build quality, terrible rust, mechanical issues, a string of replacement engines on the mid 90's V8s under warranty et etc (the list is long) - I could go on but this forum is not big enough! The cars that were built in the 2000's were just Ford cars and don't really count much to be honest, but even so they're not great.
The later variants under the new ownership are well accepted by the masses for being having far greater build quality and reliability and so hence your comments about foriegn ownership of Jaguar bringing down the quality is wrong.
You can argue until you're blue in the face but you're arguing against a plethora of information from owners and car critics that says otherwise.