Remember WINE isn't perfect though, so most people would probably still end up needing Parallels. Doing this might also kill Apple's development environments as software companies could save costs and write only one version of the software using Windows tools.I forgot to put it in the poll but I am guessing that Apple might be making an interface emulator (similar to W.I.N.E. which runs on Linux) in order for Windows programs to run on the Mac with the least resources and with the easiest transition between Windows programs and OS X Applications. I would really like that because with W.I.N.E., purchasing Windows wouldn't be necessary to run programs designed for Windows on a Mac.
True, but it would be useful for some programs that wouldn't be programmed for OS X anyway and plus professional developers who already develop for OS X wouldn't settle for only making only a Windows version when the OS X programming environment is better (and so are the results of using the OS X programming environment).Remember WINE isn't perfect though, so most people would probably still end up needing Parallels. Doing this might also kill Apple's development environments as software companies could save costs and write only one version of the software using Windows tools.
Yes that would be great for everyone--Windows users and Mac users alike but Windows' design isn't currently ready for it.Now if they released XCode for Windows you'd be talkingImagine all those Windows developers learning how to write XCode apps on their PCs, then finding porting it to Mac takes only a few hours and a recompile.
Link.And as the other Steve likes to say "Developers!! Developers!! Developers!!......"![]()
You might be right but if you are then Apple really did a good job with confidentiality this time.I don't know. but I have a feeling that Leopard will be revolutionary.
It's called Spotlight categorization and it's already part of Tiger.I hope they release a auto sorter for files and folders.![]()
With all of the attention of Jeff Han in the rumors I wouldn't be surprised if Apple was up to something besides the iPhone touch screen wise--also with a new and revolutionary iMac rumored it would all come together. Plus with Tiger having a lot more to offer than Leopard has been said to offer so far (and with less development time than Leopard) Apple has to be up to something as far as one or more major new features--if it is true that Apple is developing advanced touch screen technology then they did a good job with confidentiality because nobody suspected anything until now. (I give a lot of credit to bigraz's post linked here.)I said touch screen more out of want then think. lol
I so love watching that clip. It's the embarrassed "Should we clap or not?" reaction from the crowd that really makes it
I don't think all of BumpTop's ideas are bad. Apple could develop something much better that is similar and usable from a little inspiration from something like this development that BumpTop made. Apple made handhelds usable with the iPod, they are making touchscreen usable with the iPhone (and possibly the iMac) so I don't see why Apple couldn't use BumpTop's ideas but advance them a bit and streamline them to make features from them that actually work quite well.I've already discussed with people on youtube in comments for the videos for that thing about why Bumptop is useless.
The biggest point being: There are no filenames visible. Just icons. The desktop on a computer is a metaphor and nothing more. It's not supposed to be LITERALLY a desktop, and bumptop tries to do just that: make the desktop on a computer a literal desktop. There's a reason we organize our files in folders and don't throw them around on our desks. The day Apple even considers using Bumptop is the day I stop buying Apple products.
I've already discussed with people on youtube in comments for the videos for that thing about why Bumptop is useless.
The desktop on a computer is a metaphor and nothing more. It's not supposed to be LITERALLY a desktop, and bumptop tries to do just that: make the desktop on a computer a literal desktop.
Thats definitely worth watching...another not so secret feature is quick look (time 3:31).
I forgot to put it in the poll but I am guessing that Apple might be making an interface emulator (similar to W.I.N.E. which runs on Linux) in order for Windows programs to run on the Mac with the least resources and with the easiest transition between Windows programs and OS X Applications. I would really like that because with W.I.N.E., purchasing Windows wouldn't be necessary to run programs designed for Windows on a Mac.
It's $60 dollars and Apple could make something more streamlined with their OS so I think it has been considered by Apple--they just might decide to do it later (or maybe even not at all in order to encourage developers to make more native Mac OS X Applications--but it could grab more attention to the Mac OS X programming environment when ugly and poorly designed Windows programs are run next to the slick and streamlined Mac OS X Applications at the same time).Have you checked out Codeweavers? They have support for quite a few apps...