Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Not necessarily. USB cables are always marked as being USB2.0 ready/capable if they are in fact USB2.0 cables. Dunno if it's a lack of shielding or whatever on the older cables, but it is possible (apparently) to suffer reduced throughput if you use older cables with a USB2.0 device.

It seems like USB 2.0 cable, because before installation, I cloned my MacBook's internat drive to external (about 40 GB, Installer didn't let me to upgrade) and it took just half an hour.

If I force shutdown MacBook now, I'm not going to lose any data from my external drive, right? I know I'll mess up the internal drive if I do this, but it doesn't matter because I think I'll upgrade the Tiger system on the external drive and then just clone it to the internal one. Makes sense?
 
Exactly. For all the power users who don't like the eye candy- just use QS. Awesome app.
I'm not really interested in using Quicksilver because I like being able to use my mouse to do stuff. I mean, I hide the dock so I have plenty of screen real estate, and I have every button on my MX Revolution mapped using Steermouse to perform keyboard commands. This mouse has eleven buttons, and every one is mapped to either a global action or an app-specific action (ie, pressing the thumb-wheel button shows my Spaces overview if I'm in Finder, sends the mouse pointer to the zoom button, clicks it, and returns to the previous position if I'm in Firefox, presses the "G" key in Lightroom, does CMD+W in Photoshop and does CMD+Q for everything else) ... So, yeah - I'm all covered on the shortcuts thing. ;)

I just need a working dock (Tiger style!!) :D
 
Not necessarily. USB cables are always marked as being USB2.0 ready/capable if they are in fact USB2.0 cables. Dunno if it's a lack of shielding or whatever on the older cables, but it is possible (apparently) to suffer reduced throughput if you use older cables with a USB2.0 device.
I always thought "It is just a cable, who cares" but I did experience issues with an old USB cable. I pulled a USB2 cable from the pile and everything worked like a charm. Even if yours is USB2 cable, trying another cable is worth it. If the cable is damaged, it may be causing error rate to go up, reducing your throughput.
 
Uh oh - sorry mate! It didn't do anything that drastic on my machine, Finder just crashes (and immediately restarts) when I try to view it in QuickView. Opening it in Preview has the same effect (Preview crashes) ... Is everything OK now?

Anyway if you open it up in Photoshop you'll see that it's just a simple, single-layered document. Nothing fancy ... no idea why it crashes Finder. Actually it's not Finder that has the problem, I think it's the fact that Preview can't read it (hence QuickView can't read it, hence the Finder crash) ...

It crashed Finder for me too. Beach-balled for about 5 minutes after displaying the image in cover flow and then relaunched!
 
Shocker

Not being able to set the dock icon of a stack to anything you want is a total shocker...

And it should be corrected in the first Leopard update... as I can't see it being something very difficult to remedy...

Really... who do they invite into these usability focus groups...
 
Revise

I would like to revise and update my previous comment as it sounds rather negative.

Yes the fact that you can't set icons for stacks is poor...

But today I installed Leopard on my MacBook Pro with no problems and on startup I was left a little deflated as I had anticipated some kind of out of body experience.

Then I installed it on the Mac Pro and it didn't work. Once the system restarted it wouldn't load past the login screen...

So I did an Archive and Install and it corrected the problem and installed with no issues with previous applications and files.

So now I have spent the day using it... Not playing with the features but using them...

And I can say there is quite a difference USING Leopard to trying to be impressed with the new features.

I would liken it to remote central locking on a car. You wouldn't stand there and be impressed with the ability to unlock the doors with your keys but you don't half notice how great it is after driving around for a week or so.

Anyway, crappy analogies aside I am really starting to like Leopard. An particularly for the networking features. The ability to easily see all my computers on the network, browse folders and use Spotlight to search them all.

Once you start to chip away at the features and get comfortable it starts to show its true potential. And lest we forget that many of the improvements are to the core of this software that will only become evident when vendors begin to tax the code base to its extreme.

All my apps work including ALL of Adobe CS2. iMac synching of the doc and dashboard is sweet.

Stacks... yes could be better but they certainly offer improvements to design workflow and rapid file access.

Time Machine probably needs a few weeks of driving but so far it seems to do everything it says it will..

I know I am one voice among many and maybe these days with Apple we all expect that feeling that we got the first time we got an iPod... or the first time we switched from Windows to OS X.

But really... could Apple ever develop anything that would give you the same feeling you got when you used OS X for the first time after being stuck in Windoze land for years... I doubt it..

So far... thumbs up.. 100%... totally pleased...
 
:(

Well, after it took me several hours to get this installed, I'm wondering why I bothered. I never was able to get it to install on my desktop machine, but have it running on my laptop.

Desktop-G4 PowerMac: Tried 3 times, got 'unknown error' all 3 times after it verified the DVD. 4th time, it worked, but wouldn't upgrade, had to install on another volume. Did so. Tried to transfer my data, didn't work. Just put it on there clean, got it working. Opened Safari, it crashed. Opened Mail, it crashed. Said forget it, I'll use the old OS on this, moved on to the:

Laptop-G4 as well: Installed with some minor issues initially. Not locating my drive being the biggest. Eventually worked.

After using this afternoon now, I have to say I feel like Safari/Wifi is markedly slower. In fact, its like I'm on a bad EDGE connection. Desktop is zippping right along on the old OS and its even a slower machine. So its not my cable/internet connection.

As far as features, I can say the only really useful addition for me is Spaces. That's awesome. Everything else is just extra and eye candy. Coverflow is a great way to look through your files if you have a lot of time to waste or don't have many files. I use my machines professionally all day, every day. I'll be sticking with the list view. Stacks is pretty worthless.

I knew buying this that it wasn't a real upgrade. I bought it anyway. Now I'm not only a little disappointed, but kinda upset that my machine actually seems slower than it was before, namely Safari/WiFi. Apple bloated the OS with a lot of gadgets that may appeal to soccer mom's, but in general the OS was already great for workflow, so not much they could have really done except to speed it up.

:(
 
two things:

Adobe products are currently known to be not fully Leopard-compatible. That'll be fixed very soon. That's why Lightroom is horrible and is likely the source of your PSD issues as well.

The lightroom problem he is having is completely unrelated to Leopard.

I had the exact same problem with 10.4 and the Lightroom 1.2 patch that was supposed to fix that problem. I ended up turning off the auto-write XMP feature and just dealing with it. With some setups with some installs and with some external hard drives, it just can't handle that setting being turned on. Yes, it is a bug. yes, it is an Adobe bug. Yes, 1.2 fixed it for a lot of people. But it didn't fix it for me with a MacBook with 2.5gb of RAM and a half-full MyBook Pro 500gb drive and 15K DNG files in my library. It was like that with 10.4, and just for kicks, i turned on the auto-write XMP when upgraded to Leopard, and it is still that way. I can't use that feature, plain and simple, until Adobe fixes it. It is not Leopard-related at all.

Secondly:

A USB cable that meets the minimum spec for bearing the USB logo is capable of sending a complete USB 2.0-level signal. Often times a cable is damaged or was manufactured below the base-level requirements for USB, and it will not meet the throughput requirements of USB 2.0. That does not in any way mean that there are "USB 2.0 cables" and "USB 1.1 cables" and that they are different things. If a USB cable is incapable of maintaining USB 2.0 speeds, it is not within the basic USB spec and is therefore junk. I have little doubt that manufacturers are in some cases passing off sub-par cables as "USB 1.1 cables," but those cables should be considered rejects, as they don't meet the basic signal-quality requirements of USB and it is commentary on the resilience and flexibility of USB as a protocol that it can send ANY signal over such a cable and have the data come across reliably.

In short, no such thing as a USB 1.1 cable or a USB 2.0 cable: only sub-standard USB cables and good USB cables.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.