Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I think Apple should have included the charger. I don't buy their eco BS excuse. Unfortunately, we have to deal with what is. If you didn't know ahead of time and the phone was a gift, my response would have been different.
I mean, the OP gave a great example why itˋs NOT eco BS. 🤷‍♂️
 
  • Like
Reactions: MikeAK and ericwn
Not to mention, bad ideas can be infectious.

I’ve been vocal on here about how the shift to cheap packaging over the past 5 years, under the same guise of environmentalism, could start to influence other decisions. “Who cares about the box an apple watch comes in” was the common response.... a reasonable one, at that.

But then came exhibit A of my prediction: the AirPods Max carrying case, perhaps the most cheap and lazy thing they’ve every designed.

While I agree that packaging material is a pointless fashion exercise the charging case with AirPods products are not part of the packaging. They display not just a total lack of understanding of ease of use and bad design all around.
 
How were you charging your iPhone X?
With a Mophie QI charger.

However, I needed to replace the X because its battery enlarged and dislodged the screen (not happy about that either). The phone would get very hot when wirelessly charging, and I suspect this maybe had something to do with it, so Im going to avoid wireless.
 
That’s what the issue was about whe the new iphone 12 was being released xD Luckily, I got extra from ipad air.
 
I’ve started updating my outlets with outlet that include USB-C chargers.
then it’s no big deal.
 
I just upgraded my iPhone X to iPhone 12 Pro.

I knew there was no charging block included with this model. No matter, I have a million blocks laying around from a decade of prior purchases.

Surprise! The lightning cable terminates in usb c, not usb a. I actually don’t have a mountain of blocks compatible with this phone.

So after paying 1k, I have to spend an additional 20 bucks to charge this thing? Am I getting this right ?

Yup, you got it right. And you’ll pay that $20 to get the charger anyway. Apple knows you will. You know you will. And you’ll buy the iPhone 13 as well.
 
I just upgraded my iPhone X to iPhone 12 Pro.

I knew there was no charging block included with this model. No matter, I have a million blocks laying around from a decade of prior purchases.

Surprise! The lightning cable terminates in usb c, not usb a. I actually don’t have a mountain of blocks compatible with this phone.

So after paying 1k, I have to spend an additional 20 bucks to charge this thing? Am I getting this right ?

No, because surely you have plenty of lighting cables lying around going with those blocks?
 
So after paying 1k, I have to spend an additional 20 bucks to charge this thing? Am I getting this right ?
Yup. Upselling tactic in guise of environment marketing to get you to spend more money than you had planned.
Unfortunately, others followed suit as well, with Samsung not including a charger with their S21 phones.

At this point, it might be better spending the money on 3rd party Gan chargers that supports USB3 Power Delivery. Most of them have multiple USB-C/USB-A ports allowing multiple device charging, including laptops. Imo a better investment than the single device low-watt charger Apple is selling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Devyn89
It’s a bit messed up the way Apple made this transition. If you own a recent iPad or an iPhone 11, you’ve got the charging brick. But most people don’t upgrade every year. Which means that most people won’t already have the brick because previous models used usb-a.

Apple knows that the majority of iPhone owners do not own other Apple devices that would have a brick. So for them to drop the charger out of the box was ill-timed. They should’ve kept it for iPhone 12 and dropped it for the 12s/13. Which would at least given a larger number of people a chance to have the charger. Honestly I would’ve waited for the 2022 iPhones to make sure the 3-year cycle was covered.

I don’t buy the environmental excuse (courage, amiright). It’s based on facts but that isn’t the reason Apple made this move. All we can do is speculate, but I.m disappointed Apple made this decision.
 
I just upgraded my iPhone X to iPhone 12 Pro.

I knew there was no charging block included with this model. No matter, I have a million blocks laying around from a decade of prior purchases.

Surprise! The lightning cable terminates in usb c, not usb a. I actually don’t have a mountain of blocks compatible with this phone.

So after paying 1k, I have to spend an additional 20 bucks to charge this thing? Am I getting this right ?

I am with OP,
Apple says they don't want to waste more chargers so they skipped shipping one. Now they insert a USB-C cable, for no reason, to charge the iPhone12.

Now we have to go out and buy a new charger to charge the phone. So they made us spend even more money and did not save on chargers e-waste.
 
I swear the entitlement some people have is hilarious. They’re a company and they don’t owe you anything. This whole idea that they should cater to you is misguided. This whole issue of not including a charging brick is an issue to a small group of people that seems bigger because you’re on a dedicated Apple fan site. Regular consumers will not care and buy it regardless or get annoyed, shrug it off, and still buy a brick.

It is what is, you can stop supporting them and talk with your wallet or just suck it up and deal with it because it’s not a significant enough issue.
 
I am with OP,
Apple says they don't want to waste more chargers so they skipped shipping one. Now they insert a USB-C cable, for no reason, to charge the iPhone12.

Now we have to go out and buy a new charger to charge the phone. So they made us spend even more money and did not save on chargers e-waste.
Makes sense... but actually old iPhone users dont have to buy the new charging brick or cable(which means they have to sell their previous phone without the charging brick and cable).They can use the old ones, but it wouldnt fast charge. As for first time iPhone users yes they have to buy a USB-C charger. Its a plus minus situation.
 
I swear the entitlement some people have is hilarious. They’re a company and they don’t owe you anything. This whole idea that they should cater to you is misguided. This whole issue of not including a charging brick is an issue to a small group of people that seems bigger because you’re on a dedicated Apple fan site. Regular consumers will not care and buy it regardless or get annoyed, shrug it off, and still buy a brick.

It is what is, you can stop supporting them and talk with your wallet or just suck it up and deal with it because it’s not a significant enough issue.
Me when i first got my 12 Pro Max. But ended up buying the 20W charging brick and Magsafe cable after 2 days. Never complained again xD
 
  • Like
Reactions: Johnny Steps
I swear the entitlement some people have is hilarious. They’re a company and they don’t owe you anything. This whole idea that they should cater to you is misguided. This whole issue of not including a charging brick is an issue to a small group of people that seems bigger because you’re on a dedicated Apple fan site. Regular consumers will not care and buy it regardless or get annoyed, shrug it off, and still buy a brick.

It is what is, you can stop supporting them and talk with your wallet or just suck it up and deal with it because it’s not a significant enough issue.

Non fanatic iPhone owners do care, but you are right that they will be annoyed and just suck it up. But does that mean everyone should just lie down and take it without vocalizing their displeasure? No.

When I pay $1000+ for a device, I expect it to come with all I need to use it. Especially with the markup Apple places on their products. They can afford it. Is that entitlement? I don’t think so in this case since the device does not work unless you can charge it. You’re asked to buy additional products just to use the device you bought. That’s ass backwards. Is Apple entitled to our extra money we are forced to spend? The only saving grace is that you can buy a solution from other manufacturers.

If it bothers anyone that much, they should stop buying iPhones. There’s great Android phones out there that work just as well. Doesn’t mean they don’t have a right to complain about bad business practices that cost consumers money in nonsensical ways.
 
  • Like
Reactions: M5RahuL
Samsung thought it was a good idea because after having a pop they then did the same with their latest phone and didnt supply a plug for the cable.

I got a 12 and i have the USB-C cable in my work bag that i sometimes use with my work PC but aside from that i have usb plugs galore at home from all manner of things plus various cables to use with them to charge it, a couple of plug sockets with built in USB ports that i use the same cables with, CarPlay in the car so its charging then with the cable i always used in there and at work i've got a cable as well as the USB-C one i carry. The one thing i havent missed at any point is a plug i wouldnt have used anyway!!
 
Makes sense... but actually old iPhone users dont have to buy the new charging brick or cable(which means they have to sell their previous phone without the charging brick and cable).They can use the old ones, but it wouldnt fast charge. As for first time iPhone users yes they have to buy a USB-C charger. Its a plus minus situation.

I’ve had iPhones dating back to the 3GS. Plus 5 iPads over the years. Due to various reasons, I don’t have many working chargers left. I’ll need a new one when I get a new phone.

even if I’m a minority, it would have served more people to include a usb-a cable in the box. They just didn’t handle this transition correctly. There could’ve been less backlash had they thought it through more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spetsgruppa
I am with OP,
Apple says they don't want to waste more chargers so they skipped shipping one. Now they insert a USB-C cable, for no reason, to charge the iPhone12.

Now we have to go out and buy a new charger to charge the phone. So they made us spend even more money and did not save on chargers e-waste.

Yeah they included the current cable for no reason other than that’s what more modern computers ship with.
Next time around they might skip that cable too.
 
Now we have to go out and buy a new charger to charge the phone.
You don’t have to buy anything. If you’re upgrading from a previous iPhone, that charger still works. If you’re upgrading from an android, there’s a good chance you already have a usb c charging brick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Johnny Steps
I just upgraded my iPhone X to iPhone 12 Pro.

I knew there was no charging block included with this model. No matter, I have a million blocks laying around from a decade of prior purchases.

Surprise! The lightning cable terminates in usb c, not usb a. I actually don’t have a mountain of blocks compatible with this phone.

So after paying 1k, I have to spend an additional 20 bucks to charge this thing? Am I getting this right ?
Send it to me I’ll take it. I’ll send you my usb-a haha
 
I’ve had iPhones dating back to the 3GS. Plus 5 iPads over the years. Due to various reasons, I don’t have many working chargers left. I’ll need a new one when I get a new phone.

even if I’m a minority, it would have served more people to include a usb-a cable in the box. They just didn’t handle this transition correctly. There could’ve been less backlash had they thought it through more.
Right. Now i get your point. Apple instead gave USB-C to Lightning instead of USB-A to Lightning like previous models. Thus people have to buy USB-C charging bricks. But me personally(an ex Android user) have quite a lot of USB-C bricks. But thats just me.
 
I’m not against being disappointed with their practice, but the wording of the OP just comes off like those customers who absolutely have to fight with manager over something so in particular that the effort would have been better used in finding a less confrontational solution.

Like even you start from zero, no Apple products, no friends with a spare cable or whatever, you could go get a third party one from Best Buy significantly cheaper. Apparently though only refurbished iPhones come with a 5W brick which I find odd that they don’t include it with the lower end “budget” iPhones.
 
I’m not against being disappointed with their practice, but the wording of the OP just comes off like those customers who absolutely have to fight with manager over something so in particular that the effort would have been better used in finding a less confrontational solution.

Like even you start from zero, no Apple products, no friends with a spare cable or whatever, you could go get a third party one from Best Buy significantly cheaper. Apparently though only refurbished iPhones come with a 5W brick which I find odd that they don’t include it with the lower end “budget” iPhones.
LOL I know right. If it’s usb-a included then the argument is why is apple sticking usb-a when the future is usb-c. There will be billions of usb-a in the trash. If apple doesn’t include a cable there’s gonna be a post that says, spent $1k on a phone and no cable. Who wins this discussion.
 
Plus I think most third party cables and bricks, like Anker, are better quality and a better investment (if you can look it at the way) so it’s not an entire loss.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EM2013
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.