just dropped by to say my lg 4K that said delivers Jan 6 just was shipped. That is crazy underpromise/overdeliver.....I don't even have my MacBook yet!
just dropped by to say my lg 4K that said delivers Jan 6 just was shipped. That is crazy underpromise/overdeliver.....I don't even have my MacBook yet!
Not true, it charges a MacBook Pro at up to 60W over USB-C.I've heard it doesn't charge the MBP over USB-C, any truth to that?
Are they worth the money?
In case you're interested, the fact there is only USB 2 on the 4K display is a design decision rather than cheaping out. As it is, it can support 4K@60Hz over USB-C. If it had USB 3, there would be less bandwidth available for video, which would limit it to 30Hz.Yes they are worth it. Pricey, but worth it. The 4k has those USB 2.0 ports though, so there's that. Not a deal breaker, but hey! WTF? There's cost cutting with that one. Half the price though.
In case you're interested, the fact there is only USB 2 on the 4K display is a design decision rather than cheaping out. As it is, it can support 4K@60Hz over USB-C. If it had USB 3, there would be less bandwidth available for video, which would limit it to 30Hz.
The solution would be to use Thunderbolt 3 - however this would make the display incompatible with the 12" MacBook.
So, to make it compatible with the 12" MacBook at 60Hz they had to use USB-C with USB 2 ports.
The one that comes with the display!So what lead do you use to connect the MacBook Pro non touch bar 13 to the leg monitor?
Huh?The one that comes with the display!
In case you're interested, the fact there is only USB 2 on the 4K display is a design decision rather than cheaping out. As it is, it can support 4K@60Hz over USB-C. If it had USB 3, there would be less bandwidth available for video, which would limit it to 30Hz.
The solution would be to use Thunderbolt 3 - however this would make the display incompatible with the 12" MacBook.
So, to make it compatible with the 12" MacBook at 60Hz they had to use USB-C with USB 2 ports.
In case you're interested, the fact there is only USB 2 on the 4K display is a design decision rather than cheaping out. As it is, it can support 4K@60Hz over USB-C. If it had USB 3, there would be less bandwidth available for video, which would limit it to 30Hz.
The solution would be to use Thunderbolt 3 - however this would make the display incompatible with the 12" MacBook.
So, to make it compatible with the 12" MacBook at 60Hz they had to use USB-C with USB 2 ports.
This is a USB-C monitor so will work with computers with USB-C ports and it comes with a USB-C cable in the box.Huh?
Thought you need one of those vgi's or something to connect the laptop to the monitor?
Running in clamshell mode may help.Quick question. Are you using the monitor with a 12" MacBook? Mine appears to be a little laggy, and I think it is in 30Hz mode.
Do you know how I can check/or change this?
Sarcasm?You're not implying legitimate technical and business reasons for doing this, are you? We all know it has USB 2 because Tim Cook is counting gold coins atop his throne of dongles (or something).
Sarcasm?
Haha, it is hard to see the wood for the trees with the amount of animosity in some threads!It is my hope that I am never in a situation where I use the phrase "throne of dongles" without sarcasm. Haha. (Although I suppose I just did, technically.)
Yeah. I was being complimentary actually.
What's the difference between the one being sold by Apple and this one - http://www.lg.com/us/monitors/lg-27UD88-W-4k-uhd-led-monitor
What's the difference between the one being sold by Apple and this one - http://www.lg.com/us/monitors/lg-27UD88-W-4k-uhd-led-monitor
Haha, it is hard to see the wood for the trees with the amount of animosity in some threads!
What's the difference between the one being sold by Apple and this one - http://www.lg.com/us/monitors/lg-27UD88-W-4k-uhd-led-monitor
What's the difference between the one being sold by Apple and this one - http://www.lg.com/us/monitors/lg-27UD88-W-4k-uhd-led-monitor