At least it's adjustable, everyone here with an iMac or Thunderbolt Display has a stack of books under them.
$2500 for a high end iMac and it doesn't even have adjustable height. It's like Ive never uses any of his creations.
At least it's adjustable, everyone here with an iMac or Thunderbolt Display has a stack of books under them.
This reads like a paid advertisement more so than an actual review.
If that seems like an ad to you, I'd love to hear some of your compliments. "Don't get me wrong, you're not beautiful, but you're not terrible."Make no mistake, this doesn't look like an Apple display, but it's certainly not terrible.
Even the Pixel is not perfect. Many devices have been powering down with 30% battery left. A case of out of the frying pan into the fire perhaps?I used Apple products because they are beautiful, sturdy, and cooperate together. I love the harmony of the ecosystem and aesthetics. If I wanted function over form, I would buy PCs - oh wait - I did this year because Apple hasn't updated some products in years. This 3rd party device is part of a problem at Apple and their brand.
I've replaced my Airport, monitors, PC, and AppleTV since the ridiculous Apple announcement of the MacBook in October - I am eyeing Google Pixel for phone and tablet in the coming months too. I even abandoned iCloud for Google services. And Siri is a joke next to Google Assistant, so Google Home will happen soon.
Apple will need a big bang release of a lot of stuff at one time to really knock my socks off - but I just don't think they can pull it off.
I think it's a good, solid endorsement for a product that is great with a few minor issues. God forbid someone not find something to complain about.i come here for editorial content, poster analysis, etc. This is a bit puff
Yep, not as good as antennagate on the iPhone 4. Or as good as the first iPhones which had displays that stopped functioning. Or as good as the iPhone 3G or 3GS that took a step backwards - removing the fused glass/LCD and which allowed outrageous amounts of dust and debris in between the glass and the LCD panel. Or as good as the old MacBook Pros that had bunk CD/DVD drives. Or as good as the so-obviously-rushed iPad 3 that ran hot and was underpowered.
I could go on.
Apple isn't perfect now. And it wasn't then, either.
I think we can all agree even more that if Steve is rolling in his grave, there's an earthquake in the general area or they're secretly moving him to the new spaceship. I think we can all agree most that if he rolled at the sight of this monitor then he would be a shoe in for a guest 3-4 episode arc on The Walking Dead.I think we can at least all agree that Steve is rolling in his grave at the sight of this plastic monitor.
Does anyone know the camera resolution? I contacted Apple and even their support team doesn't know! I would assume 720p, but then again there is a 480p webcam in the MacBook. Those bezels are certainly chunky enough to house an HD camera.
I did a Quicktime video using the camera and it recorded in 720p, so I'm assuming that is the resolution of the camera.
Why is that a problem exactly? I come here because I like the site. I come here for no cost, not paid a cent since joining. The odd ad isn't a problem. In fact I wouldn’t even bat an eyelid if they doubled the number of ads.
Why is that a problem exactly? I come here because I like the site. I come here for no cost, not paid a cent since joining. The odd ad isn't a problem. In fact I wouldn’t even bat an eyelid if they doubled the number of ads.
you don't really understand technology5K resolution on a screen this small is a total waste of technology.
My situation exactly. I'd LOVE an upgrade to my Thunderbolt Display but the MBP 2016 15" didn't deliver the >16GB memory or enough CPU/GPU performance jump over my 4+ year old 2012 rMBP to justify dropping $4000 for a new MBP. Disappointed.I want one, too bad I don't have one of the new MacBook Pros
I simply cannot understand why LG did not cooperate with Apple on the design of this monitor, which was clearly meant for Macs. Jony Ive could have designed something better on his lunch break.
I think we can at least all agree that Steve is rolling in his grave at the sight of this plastic monitor.
Worthy companion, my ass. The display have a limited colorspace. They can't do full, or even close to full, Adobe RGB 1998. I would have bought a new monitor since the one I am using is aging. These are useless to me...
We will have to wait until Apple releases a brand new iMac 5K with Thunderbolt 3 connectivity. This will make it possible to have a dual 5K setup at nearly 30 million pixels.I'd love to know how it works with an iMac 5K. Once you have the writer cable, can it match the look of the iMac 5K in resolution, screen height, etc?
Ah, Ok. My bad.BryanJ is talking about the way the review reads, not about the ads on the site.
Can't say I'm digging the un-evenness of the bezel being larger on the top side than the bottom. Symmetry is wonderful.
What? It's cheap looking and ugly as can be. Look at LG's TV's and tell me what's wrong here.Despite that I haven't seen one in person, I actually like how clean and minimal this new display looks.
See my post here.I asked Apple when the monitor was first announced, countless people on Twitter and LG, as well as when items were delivered but still have yet to find anyone to confirm the resolution of the camera. So far Macs have been limited to 720 and hoping this highend monitor will finally support at least HD (1080). So odd that it doesn't mention this spec anywhere. Can someone confirm?